Indian Holocaust My Father`s Life and Time - SIX HUNDRED TWENTY
Palash Biswas
http://indianholocaustmyfatherslifeandtime.blogspot.com/
http://basantipurtimes.blogspot.com/
Ruling Marxists Brahmins opened Floodgates and Mamata Banerjee riding over Popular Change Waves NOT Only Sustains Regimented Gestapo Manusmriti Rule but ENSURES OVERWHELMING Foreign Capital Regime in Bengal and United states of America, Global Hindutva Zionist Order, Pro US PRO Corporate Brhamincal CIVIL Society, Intelligentsia and Media back Ms Banerjee who has ROCK SOLID India Incs and MNC Backing. WTO Blue Eyed boy , the FICCI Man AMIT MITRA is all set to lead the VEDIC ASHWAMEDH Yagna supported by Dinesh Trivedi, Industrialist, Upen Biswas,EX DIG CBI, IPS officers Rachpal Singh and Sultan Singh, EX Chief Secretary manish Gupta and so on!
After roping in the former state chief secretary Manish Gupta, who will be pitted against Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in Jadavpur, the Trinamool has roped in another heavyweight.
Amit Mitra — Padma Shree award winner and general secretary of the Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industries (FICCI) - will be fielded against state Finance Minister Asim Dasgupta at Kharda constituency.
On Monday evening, Mitra met Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee at her Kalighat home and after emerging, announced that he has become a member of the party.
"There will be a tectonic shift in West Bengal after Mamata Banerjee comes to power," said Mitra, an eminent economist who has taught in several foreign universities. "For 34 years, we were under party rule and cadre rule and not government rule. Today, it is only because of Mamata Banerjee that people like us feel inspired to come forward and work shoulder to shoulder to bring about change in West Bengal. There will be a new sunrise soon."
FREE Market Zionist Brahaminical Economy is all for CORRUPTION, LOBBYING, DOMINANCE, EXCLUSION, ETHNIC CLEANSING and EXODUS Plus HOLOCUST. Progressive Marxists Brahaminical Bengal Opts for FREE MARKET and USA Supports!After Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee's excellent performance in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, her stock rose proportionately among the Americans. Ironically, the CIVIL Society, Intelligentsia and Media which support Economic Reforms and LPG Raj Most, have launched a PRO US US sponsered JP Like Zionist Gandhian Anti Corruption Campaign TARGETING Constitution of India and Dr Ambedkar. Entire NGO Brigade and RSS and Hindutva represented by Ravishankar and Baba Ramdev supports it. And it is hyped too much that This month, the whole nation rallied behind social activist Anna Hazare as he launched a campaign against corruption and setting up of a strong anti-corruption body.His victory came after the government agreed to setup a committee, which includes members from the government as well as the civil society, to draft the Lokpal Bill to fight corruption.But a flurry of allegations of corruption and questions over the credibility have targeted the civil activists on the Lokpal Bill committee, which pairs five ministers with five activists.
But the Cup Boards are full of Blood, Bones and Human Flesh as the CIVIL Society memebrs in the Lokpal Panel are themselves siezed with Seripus GRAFT Chrages!Meanwhile,Activist Binayak Sen , who last week got bail from the Supreme Court in a case of sedition, has been awarded a prestigious South Korean award for human rights for 2011.
Now, speaking on the issue, Finance Minister and Congress party's chief troubleshooter Pranab Mukherjee has said that the government is committed to a strong Lokpal Bill.
"Controversies have been raised about some members of the joint drafting committee on the Lokpal Bill. I would like to make clear that in the view of government as well as the view of my party, the Congress, the working of the committee will not, in any way, be affected by these controversies. The government members on the committee are looking forward to working with Anna Hajare and his colleagues on the committee and to draft a strong and sound Lokpal bill in order to fight corruption."
Read more at: http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/govt-committed-to-strong-lokpal-bill-pranab-mukherjee-100842?cp
-
Twenty22-India on the move: Mamata's manifesto
22 Mar 2011 ... Mamata's manifesto. Turn Kolkata into an international financial hub. Plan for new airports at Malda, Cooch Behar, Balurghat, ...
20twentytwo.blogspot.com/2011/03/mamatas-manifesto.html -Cached -
The Legend of Zelda and the Tooth Fairy Manifesto |Mamta's Musings
20 Feb 2011 ... I grab my laptop and mime a search for the Tooth Fairy Manifesto. A couple of clicks and two more pounded Enters later and here we are. ...
mamtathacker.wordpress.com/.../the-legend-of-zelda-and-the-tooth-fairy-manifesto/ - Cached -
Didi has her way, Cong gets just 1 more
2 posts - 1 author - Last post: 22 MarMamata releasing her party manifesto ... Congress knows the importance of Mamta Bannerjee, who has emerged as the only alternative to the ...
www.indianexpress.com/news/didi-has-her...1.../2 - United States -Cached -
Mamata's fantasies for Bengal - 1 - National News – News – MSN India
20 Apr 2011 ... If Karl Marx wrote the 'Communist Manifesto',Mamata Banerjee has just written the 'Anti-Communist Manifesto'....
news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=5130205 -Cached -
Mamata's election manifesto puts stress on industry
22 Mar 2011 ... Mamata Banerjee led TMC has released its election manifesto today promising to bring all round development in West Bengal with special ...
www.business-standard.com › Home › Economy & Policy - Cached -
Mamata Banerjee releases poll manifesto highlighting 'good ...
22 Mar 2011 ... Mamata Banerjee releases poll manifestohighlighting 'good governance' Kolkata, Mar 21 : Emphasising on 'good governance,' Trinamool ...
www.indiametronews.com/mamata-banerjee-releases-poll-manifesto-highlighting-good-governance/ - Cached -
Singur takes a backseat in Mamata's poll manifesto
19 Apr 2011 ... Financial express latest business and finance news: Singur takes a backseat in Mamata's poll manifesto.
www.financialexpress.com/news/singur...a...mamatas...manifesto/.../0- Cached -
Mamata manifesto kills two demons - Worldnews.com
22 Mar 2011 ... Calcutta, March 22: Mamata Banerjee's reputation as a street fighter has always gone hand-in-hand with a high dose of scepticism about her ...
article.wn.com/view/2011/.../Mamata_manifesto_kills_two_demons/- Cached
-
West Bengal Exit Poll, West Bengal Election 2011,Opinion poll ...
Keeping you updated with all the information related to WestBengal State Assembly Elections 2011: Exit poll & Opinion PollResults.
indian-electionaffairs.com/West%20Bengal/...elections.../Exit_Poll_results_West%20Bengal_Assembly_Elections_2011.html - Cached -
Bengal Election Opinion Poll | West Bengal Election 2011
75 Percent Polling in First phase of West Bengal AssemblyElection ... opinion polls on Left Front prospects">Sitaram Yechury ignores opinion polls on Left ...
westbengalelections2011.com/search/bengal-election-opinion-poll- Cached -
Westbengal Election Opinion Polls | West Bengal Election 2011
75 Percent Polling in First phase of West Bengal AssemblyElection ...
westbengalelections2011.com/.../westbengal-election-opinion-polls- Cached -
Sitaram Yechury ignores opinion polls on Left Front prospects ...
Kolkata, 15 April : CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury today refused to attach ...
westbengalelections2011.com/sitaram-yechury-ignores-opinion-polls-on-left-front-prospects.html - Cached -
West Bengal Elections 2011, Assembly ElectionResults
Detailed coverage of West Bengal Elections 2011, past Assembly election results and constituency ... Star News Opinion Poll gives clear majority to Mamata ...
www.travelindia-guide.com/assembly-elections/west-bengal/ -Cached -
Opinion poll West Bengal - Thoughts of Ordinary Man
14 Apr 2011 ... Today, leading Indian news channel star news showed opinion polls for West Bengal assembly election 2011. West Bengal six phase assembly ...
www.thoughtsofanordinaryman.com/.../opinion-poll-west-bengal.html - Cached -
West Bengal election exit poll, West Bengal ELECTION SURVEY RESULT ...
3 Dec 2010 ... West Bengal election exit poll, West Bengal ELECTION SURVEY RESULT, who will win in West Bengal polls2011, exit poll, West Bengal Opinion ...
infoelection.com/infoelection/.../160-opinion-poll-westbengal.html - Cached -
West Bengal Elections 2011 Opinion Poll...
West Bengal Elections 2011 Opinion Poll. West Bengali Elections 2011 Opinion Poll. AC Nielsen Star Ananda Opinion Polls 2011 ...
www.bhalobasa.in/articles/.../West-Bengal-Elections-2011-Opinion-Poll - Cached -
Tamil Nadu Assembly Elections 2011 | Opinion Poll
The OUTLOOK-MDRA opinion poll for the forthcoming assemblyelections in the ... West Bengal Election 2011 Date | Poll Dates,Election Result Update 2011 ...
www.resultupdate.com/9131-tamil-nadu-assembly-elections-2011-opinion-poll/ - Cached
-
<B>Devangshu Datta:</B> Mamata's train of time-servers
Business Standard - 3 hours agoAssume that "Didi", aka Mamata Banerjee, will soon be sitting in ...The TMC's coherent, market-friendly manifesto details objectives and timelines. ... -
Singur takes a backseat in Mamata's pollmanifesto
Financial Express - Sudipta Datta - 4 days ago
A far cry from the 2009 general election, where themanifesto of the Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress had large parts devoted to Singur, promising to ...The making of Mamata Banerjee - Hindustan Times
Economics Journal: Imagining Mamata Banerjee's West Bengal - Wall Street Journal (blog)
Tempest of change - Deccan Chronicle
Washington Bangla Radio - Weekly Blitz
all 437 news articles »
-
Mamata's fantasies for Bengal
MSN India - 2 days agoIf Karl Marx wrote the 'Communist Manifesto',Mamata Banerjee has just written the 'Anti-Communist Manifesto'. The grand vision statement for West Bengal ...
-
Kolkata calling: Tourism to be engine of Mamata'seconomic ...
Financial Express - 8 Apr 2011Kolkata: In the Trinamool Congress manifesto, Mamata Banerjee sets a short-term target of 200 days and a long-term target of 1000 days to transform Bengal's ...Leader, thinker, crusader - Times of India
Mamata's Bluff Exposed - People's Democracy
all 28 news articles » -
''Mamata cannot provide solution to LF''s misrule in Bengal''
IBNLive.com - 5 Apr 2011Interestingly, the BJP poll manifesto admitted Banerjee's popularity in West Bengal."Mamata'santi-CPI(M) stand is unalloyed. There is no doubt that she is ...Times NowDidi's SEZ ban leaves exporters in a quandary -Financial Express
Rivalry reloaded - Indian Express
MSN India - Business Standard (blog)
all 195 news articles »
-
Desire for change among Bengal voters
Business Standard (blog) - Swati Garg - 11 Apr 2011
Kolkata and its satellite townships of Rajarhat and Salt Lake might vote for change but apprehensions are manifest. "Mamata Banerjee is good at making tall ...Trinamool Congress campaign goes hi-tech in West Bengal - Economic Times
Mamata Banerjee's march toward chief ministership is anything but ... - Pune Mirror
MSN India
all 151 news articles »
-
Polls 2011: BJP hits out at both Left and Trinamool
Daily News & Analysis - Santanu Banerjee - 5 Apr 2011
The party manifesto talked about all issues from economic stagnation to unemployment and laid out "Atal Behari Vajpayee's development vision". "Mamata ...Manifesto projects BJP as viable alternative - The Hindu
On sops, BJP matches Left, grain by grain - Indian Express
all 4 news articles » -
The ascent
Calcutta Telegraph - 4 days ago
Yet this was the man who had struck Mamata a humiliating blow back in 1991, ... while releasing hermanifesto that spelt out her "vision" for the state. ...
-
Yechury slams Mamata for terming CPI(M) and BJP as brothers
The Hindu - 15 Apr 2011Asked as to why CPI(M) poll manifesto had a two-line mention of BJP, ... Mr. Yechury had a dig at Ms.Mamata Banerjee's selection of candidates on the basis ...
-
Mukul seeks stay on mike ban order
Times of India - 5 Apr 2011BJP manifesto : BJP on Tuesday described their former ally and Trinamool chairperson Mamata Banerjee as a symbol of anarchy'. Party general secretary Ananth ...
Stay up to date on these results:
"Controversies have been raised about some members of the joint drafting committee on the Lokpal Bill. I would like to make clear that in the view of government as well as the view of my party, the Congress, the working of the committee will not, in any way, be affected by these controversies. The government members on the committee are looking forward to working with Anna Hajare and his colleagues on the committee and to draft a strong and sound Lokpal bill in order to fight corruption."
Read more at: http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/govt-committed-to-strong-lokpal-bill-pranab-mukherjee-100842?cp
US President Barack Obama today said that America needs to adapt to a changing world wherein countries like India and China are rising and areas like the Middle East are becoming less stable.
"We were seeing changes around the world -- countries like China and India rising; areas like the Middle East becoming less stable; the world shrinking because of technology, much of it invented right here in this region," Obama said in his remarks at a fund raising event in San Francisco.
"So I think we understood that we were going to have to adapt in some fundamental way in order to make sure that our kids and our grandkids ended up inheriting the kind of America that we inherited," he said.
Noting that there are moments in history that are inflection points, Obama said he understood this in 2008 that the US was entering into one of those periods.
"Domestically, we had gone through a decade in which the economy was growing but it was growing on top of a bubble. And people at the very top were doing very well, but the wages and incomes of ordinary families had flatlined, and we were starting as a government to live beyond our means with tax cuts and two wars that weren't paid for," he said.
"So I think people understood even before the recession hit that somehow the way our economy was operating was not conducive to long-term sustained economic growth or making sure that everybody had a chance at the American Dream," Obama said.
Soon thereafter his speech was interrupted by a group of people attending the fundraising. Through a song they protested against the alleged mistreatment of WikiLeaks suspect Bradley Manning.
Earlier this week, Obama created controversy by targeting "cheap health care" in countries like India and Mexico arguing that Americans should avail of "high quality" treatment available here.
"My preference would be that you don't have to travel to Mexico or India to get cheap health care. I'd like you to be able to get it right here in the United States of America that is high quality," Obama said at a community college in Virginia.
Earleir, Obama's remarks on American companies outsourcing jobs to Indian firms had stirred a controversy in India.
With allegations levelled against some civil society members of the joint committee on the Lokpal bill, Moily said "we should not give more credence to such allegations. Arguments and counter-arguments should not dilute such an important step".
"What is important is the dedication, willingness and determination to table the important bill. When the government is determined to table the bill, all others should cooperate", Moily said.
To another question, Moily said the draft bill would be formulated by all the members of the joint committee. "All their views will be taken into account and the bill will be formulated through a consensus".
He said even though social activist Anna Hazare did not indicate the deadline for drafting the Lokpal Bill, "suo moto we want to complete it (drafting) by June 30 and we aim to introduce the bill in the monsoon session of parliament".
"Emotions aside, all of us need to work together to bring out a strong Lokpal Bill", he said responding to a query on the threat by Karnataka Lokayukta Justice Santosh Hegde, a committee member, that he was contemplating to quit the panel as he was fed up with the allegations against its members.
Refusing to comment on the sense of hurt expressed by Hegde over Congress leader Digvijay Singh's statements, Moily said "people are entitled to their emotions. I would not like to comment on this. However, what is important is the implementation of a strong Lokpal Bill".
In a diplomatic cable, leaked by whistleblower website WikiLeaks, sent by the US consulate here in 2009, the officials advised their political bosses back home to cultivate the mercurial leader who is likely to be the next West Bengal chief minister.
The cable painted an appreciative picture of the railway minister who it said was "conscientiously trying to transform her image from a political maverick and firebrand to a woman ready, able and willing to lead India's fourth most populous state."
The Americans have a reason to back her ascendancy to the top political post in Bengal as the CPM led-Left government had maintained their aversion for everything imperialistic. "Banerjee is inspiring the faithful and convincing the agnostic that the CPM's 33-year uninterrupted rule in Bengal is set to end. Her July 21 (2009) rally in Kolkata, with crowds estimated up to half a million, was this summer's largest political demonstration and dwarfed the CPM's August 31 timid and lacklustre response."
The cable went a step ahead to advise US government: "Her party's public rhetoric, devoid of any anti-Americanism... is encouraging signs that a Banerjee-led Bengal government will be friendlier to the US".
Biman said so...
CPM general secretary Prakash Karat said the leaked cables on Mamata Banerjee proved what Left Front chairman Biman Bose had been claiming -- that capitalists, and especially the US, were campaigning in favour of the Congress-Trinamool Congress combine in the Bengal polls.
THE UNQUIET GRAVE
- Free market principles have a place for bribery
CUTTING CORNERS: Ashok Mitra
If he were all by himself, the well-meaning, if somewhat confused as well as loquacious, Gandhian might have been more effectively tackled. But a different situation emerged with this wild rush on the part of stalwarts of India Incorporated and the film industry, undoubtedly the real cognoscenti of goings-on in the dark world of corruption. To avoid any embarrassing development in the awkward election season, the prime minister had to sign a post-dated cheque. What would happen once the polls in the five states were safely over is a bridge which will be crossed only on arrival.
Meanwhile, please, please, do not run away with the impression that the regime in New Delhi is unconcerned with regard to the matter. No question corruption is eating into the vitals of the nation; ministers shaping economic policy have asked their pet backroom boys to come up with ideas about how to get rid of the scourge. The backroom boys are burning midnight oil in search of the right medicine. One of them — a very high ranking flunkey — has a brainwave. He has hit upon a stratagem to weed out, once and for all, corruption from the country: let bribe-giving be made legal so that offering inducement to someone to render an undue favour ceases to be a punishable offence; hey presto, corruption will disappear, the nation will regain its moral stature.
The senior government functionary has made this suggestion in a public forum; it has been taken note of in the media. No, he is not being frivolous; nor is he off his rocker. He is obviously a votary of the free market and must have arrived where he has after arguing it out in his mind — most probably in the following manner. An individual or a corporate body in a free market milieu should have the prerogative to maximize profit. To further this overriding goal, the individual or corporate organization directly may need to secure a government contract. If bribing this or that politician or civil servant is the easiest way to swing the contract, he/she or it must be allowed to go ahead; issues of ethics must not intrude, nor should the government act as spoilsport. The corporate world in particular should have the freedom to dangle a bribe if that would hasten the completion of a project and thereby speed up economic activity. To consider bribe-giving as a crime, therefore, goes ill with the principles of the free market. True, the authorities could have a problem. The general public might not quite comprehend the organic relationship between profit maximization and gross domestic product growth or between bribe-giving and profit maximization. Given society's primeval prejudice against bribery, it might be politically unwise to give blanket clearance to bribery. Well, in that eventuality, the government has still a way out. While it decriminalizes bribe-giving, it might retain the interdict on bribe-taking. Let civil servants and others in key positions in public institutions, including banks and insurance companies, be made to keep away from accepting bribes; the market for bribery will then cease to exist since the demand for bribes will dry up, society will automatically be free of corruption.
Breathtaking logic; there are a couple of thorny issues though. First, will it not be equally felicitous if, instead of attacking the problem on the demand side, the law comes down heavily on acts of bribe-giving, so that the supply side of the market for bribery disappears? Along with bribe-giving, the taking of bribes, too, is in any case at present a criminal offence. That has not inconvenienced the acceptors of bribes. If those who receive illegal gratification have no fear of god now, how will things change under the dispensation proposed by the eminent bureaucrat? It can, of course, be maintained that once investigating officers are relieved of the burden of tracking down bribe-givers, there will be more time and resources at their disposal for identifying and prosecuting habitual bribe-takers. Consider, however, the instance of a corporate body which currently engages a whole army of lawyers, accountants and fixers to ensure that their various bribe-giving activities escape the eye of the law. If offering bribes becomes an honest, legally permissible enterprise, the corporation will make a great saving of money and other resources. It will nevertheless still need to land luscious contracts by suborning individuals who distribute contracts or award permits and licences. The risk involved in accepting illegal gratification will now be somewhat greater than before for those who are targeted for seduction. The demand price of a standard bribe will, in the circumstances, tend to move up. The corporate entity will however experience no special difficulty. Despite the stiffening of the demand price, the resources it will have saved on account of lawyers, auditors, fixers, et al previously engaged for covering up its bribe-giving ventures can now be deployed to offer extra inducements to bribe-takers. The business of bribery, instead of shrinking, would, for all one can surmise, actually prosper further.
Bribe-givers and bribe-takers in any event together constitute a gigantic concordium. They are two ends of the same transaction, and share a common vested interest. Why not recognize another harsh reality too? Bribery will refuse to die out in a climate where freedom of the market is held sacrosanct. Investigating officers at different levels are themselves increasingly succumbing to the charm of the practitioners of the open art of bribe-giving. And it is not just investigating officers; zealots determined to corrupt society are buying up ministers, civil servants, police personnel, lawyers, accountants, economists, journalists, writers, even some members of the judiciary.
Even if the issue of ethics is kept aside, the brainwave of the high dignitary is therefore grossly unrealistic and might, in fact, provide a further boost to the corrupting forces in society. Even so, it is interesting to take note of the frightening fuzziness in the general environment that encourages functionaries occupying important positions in government to broach ideas of such an absurdly outrageous nature. Cynicism is the reigning king. Money-making through means fair or what was considered even till the other day as foul is now being taken for granted and regarded as the quintessence of existence. In this malign — or is it benign — climate, a tolerant view of hitherto taboo acts has slunk into the core of public policy; if a little greasing of some palms enables a tycoon or a corporate body to add to his/her or its earnings, why should the government demur? — it should rather extend a helping hand, look the other way when the ceremony of palm-greasing is taking place or, better still, decriminalize what has been till now a cognizable criminal offence. No stigma, the hint is being dropped, must attach to bribe-giving if it is for the noble cause of profit maximization on the part of an individual or a corporate body; don't you know, such practices accelerate the rate of growth of the gross domestic product?
Once the moral shackle is removed, the consequences can indeed be bizarre. For if bribery is going to be no longer illegal, and bribe-givers are showered with accolades for their efforts towards raising the rate of GDP growth higher and higher, other pressure groups are soon bound to appear on the scene, arguments may even be stretched to extraordinarily monstrous lengths. A rapist, it could even be suggested, should go scot free, the onus would be shifted to the victim who was careless enough to get violated. A murderer might remain a free bird; he was merely out on a lark, the murdered individual had no business to get killed. The fake pilots who have been for years endangering the lives of thousands of passengers would continue to enjoy high living while the petty official in the directorate general of civil aviation who issued licences to them for a consideration would languish in prison.
Adam Smith, whose tract, An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, is the bible of freebooters and votaries of unbridled money-spinners, was the professor of moral philosophy at the University of Edinburgh. He must be quaking in his grave.
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110422/jsp/opinion/story_13873307.jsp
Amit Mitra | We desperately need technology from US
Elizabeth Roche
The US last week removed companies under the Indian Space Research Organisation and the Defence Research and Development Organisation off the commerce department's "entities list". In another move, it also opened up previously prohibited dual-use technologies for export. Amit Mitra, secretary-general of the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci), spoke about what these steps mean for India-US trade ties even as US commerce secretary Gary Locke visits India. Edited excerpts:
There were two steps the US government took last week—one on the entities list and the other on export of dual-use technology. What is their significance?
First, we need to understand that technology denial in terms of specific companies being in the entities list is very different from the export-control regime... We had a total of 212 Indian companies which were on the entities list originally. What that meant is that no American company could trade or invest with these companies. That 212 has slowly come down to four in the last six months or so. Those four are conglomerates and under them there are 16 companies... Out of the 16 companies on the entities list, nine companies have been taken off it. In effect, only the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and nuclear plants not inspected by the international inspectorate system remain on the entities list... Other than these, all companies are open for trade with the United States. That does not mean they will not meet with licensing requirements that they may meet with denials of dual-use technologies... Now in this, there has been a big change that nobody has talked about. On the 27th of January, India has been raised from the three-country grouping called D1, D2, D3 to a higher level of strategic alliance called A2. This is the big step—that means a whole lot of areas which we could not trade in, whether you were in the entities list or not, areas where you needed licensing, which was prohibitive in the nature of licensing, we have been raised from that level to the equivalent of many European countries. Obviously, this in a way has been timed with the visit of Locke.
Could you give an example to show what this elevation to A2 means for Indian businesses?
I think the biggest advantage of this is vaccines. We could not import mature biotechnological materials to convert into vaccines... What this will do is, while many prohibited items would remain in the licensing structure, licences would be much easier to acquire as compared to the previous process.
You had said once that the US denied India 10 out of a list of 16 dual-use technologies, whereas European allies were denied four. After the change, how many types can we access from the US?
One example I have given you—which is vaccines. Even on homeland security technologies, there was one section that relates to terrorist combat technologies. So out of 10, I would not be surprised if five or six get dropped and we get close to the European numbers. We may not be equal to Nato (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) members, at the A1 level...
Would you say that the US has taken these steps as it is struggling to revive its economy and needs India more today as a big market for technology?
It would be wrong to say the US needs India and we don't need them; its technology we desperately need. If we have an F16 or an F18, it strengthens our capacity to deal with our neighbours in terms of potential threats. In terms of civil aviation, millions of jobs have been created in India. When you go to the nuclear sector, we have promised over time 274,000 megawatts in the next 15 years. Once the shift takes place from uranium to thorium, that becomes an even bigger play. As far as safe cities is concerned, our cities are prone to terrorist activities because we don't have the latest technological prowess. Just as the United States needs to sell its technology to create new jobs, that is their challenge of this decade, we need them as desperately to upgrade our economy...
What do you think will be the thrust areas during Locke's trip?
...One of the agendas of secretary Locke will be how does he get over the question of (civil nuclear) liability, which has been dogging the US and many other countries. Two: civil aviation. Air India was expected to have been supplied with 28 Boeing Dreamliners...Then there are Jet Airways, SpiceJet... Then you come to defence, which is the third item. We are looking at a global competition for medium multirole combat aircraft. Now the US has two of those in the competition—the F16 from Lockheed Martin and the F18 from Boeing...Then we come to ICT (information and communication technology), which is the fourth item...The key to ICT to them is technology driven—which is homeland security. India today is facing a massive Maoist insurgency, it is facing terrorism from across the border, so homeland security is a matter that is going to expand massively. All this means huge purchase of advanced, cutting-edge, newly developed homeland security material.
03:21PM | April 22,2011The estimate is way below the government's forecast of 9% growth in 2011-12 11:40PM | April 21,2011Agency seeks details of bank transactions, foreign exchange, details of travels abroad since Feb 2005
- Controversies won't affect Lokpal panel: Pranab11 mins ago
- Hindu directors may move court over ouster56 mins ago
- The Week in Review for 22 April 2011
- DoT for review of Trai recommendations to cancel 69 licences
- DGH to summon RIL next month on falling KG-D6 output
- Sebi to set rules for art funds, antique investments
12:23 AM | April 22,2011 Prime Minister Manmohan Singh says he wants the 12th Five Year Plan to fix new targets and tackle issues like energy and urbanization 05:24 PM | April 21,2011 It had banned shipments of iron ore from 10 ports and stopped its transport to other ports for exports in July last year, citing a drive against illegal mining and the need to preserve the raw material for local steelmakers 12:33 PM | April 21,2011 A bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice B S Chauhan cancelled their bail and directed them to surrender within this period, failing which the central investigative agency will take steps to arrest them 01:15 AM | April 22,2011 The members of the ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA) on 15 April had disrupted the proceedings of the PAC, citing the JPC probe 11:40 PM | April 21,2011 Agency seeks details of bank transactions, foreign exchange, details of travels abroad since Feb 2005 11:20 PM | April 21,2011 None of the senior supervisors responsible for flight safety underwent any formal training in this specialized area, the report says 04:44 PM | April 19,2011 Forecast to be reviewed in June; earlier forecasts have been for normal rains; 03:23 PM | April 19,2011 Food inflation has moderated to 8.28% for the week ending 1 April, 2011 from 9.18% in the previous reporting week 04:36 PM | April 18,2011 Procurement in major producing states of Haryana and Punjab, which generally starts from 1 April and picks up from 15 April, had been very low till Sunday because of less arrival of crop in the markets due to delay in harvesting 01:15 AM | April 22,2011 Around 200 students, who had already been placed, were given an option to apply for the top-dollar jobs on offer, but only 18 pursued this option 12:16 AM | April 21,2011 India is on track to meet most of its Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) due to its strong growth since the 1980s, says the latest Global 04:4 PM | March 31,2011 In past 10 years, female literacy rate rose to 65.46% in 2011 from 53.67% in 2001; male literacy rose from 75.26% to 82.14% 03:21 PM | April 22,2011 The estimate is way below the government's forecast of 9% growth in 2011-12 12:58 AM | April 22,2011 The death of student start-ups due to the shortage of financing and mentoring is intriguing because investors and mentors say they are open to helping such ventures; the problem, they say, is that students don't know much about the business they... 11:59 PM | April 21,2011 A detailed study by Crisil Ltd says that not only will Indian companies face a squeeze in their margins as the Reserve Bank of India progressively hikes policy rates, cut back in investments will force them to contend with a capacity constraint 09:3 PM | April 07,2011 The project is important for the city as it will not only reduce the distance between Pune and city by at least forty five minutes but also provide better connectivity to the proposed second airport for city in Navi Mumbai 07:30 PM | April 01,2011 The Road Transport and Highways Ministry has requested the World Bank for financing the projects that include conversion of 20,000 km of state highways into national highways, besides upgrading 17,000 km of the latter 02:48 PM | April 01,2011 The BMRTSP has a total cost of $2.7 billion and is scheduled to be completed in 2013
Tags - Find More Articles On:
The US last week removed companies under the Indian Space Research Organisation and the Defence Research and Development Organisation off the commerce department's "entities list". In another move, it also opened up previously prohibited dual-use technologies for export. Amit Mitra, secretary-general of the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci), spoke about what these steps mean for India-US trade ties even as US commerce secretary Gary Locke visits India. Edited excerpts:
There were two steps the US government took last week—one on the entities list and the other on export of dual-use technology. What is their significance?
First, we need to understand that technology denial in terms of specific companies being in the entities list is very different from the export-control regime... We had a total of 212 Indian companies which were on the entities list originally. What that meant is that no American company could trade or invest with these companies. That 212 has slowly come down to four in the last six months or so. Those four are conglomerates and under them there are 16 companies... Out of the 16 companies on the entities list, nine companies have been taken off it. In effect, only the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and nuclear plants not inspected by the international inspectorate system remain on the entities list... Other than these, all companies are open for trade with the United States. That does not mean they will not meet with licensing requirements that they may meet with denials of dual-use technologies... Now in this, there has been a big change that nobody has talked about. On the 27th of January, India has been raised from the three-country grouping called D1, D2, D3 to a higher level of strategic alliance called A2. This is the big step—that means a whole lot of areas which we could not trade in, whether you were in the entities list or not, areas where you needed licensing, which was prohibitive in the nature of licensing, we have been raised from that level to the equivalent of many European countries. Obviously, this in a way has been timed with the visit of Locke.
Could you give an example to show what this elevation to A2 means for Indian businesses?
I think the biggest advantage of this is vaccines. We could not import mature biotechnological materials to convert into vaccines... What this will do is, while many prohibited items would remain in the licensing structure, licences would be much easier to acquire as compared to the previous process.
You had said once that the US denied India 10 out of a list of 16 dual-use technologies, whereas European allies were denied four. After the change, how many types can we access from the US?
One example I have given you—which is vaccines. Even on homeland security technologies, there was one section that relates to terrorist combat technologies. So out of 10, I would not be surprised if five or six get dropped and we get close to the European numbers. We may not be equal to Nato (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) members, at the A1 level...
Would you say that the US has taken these steps as it is struggling to revive its economy and needs India more today as a big market for technology?
It would be wrong to say the US needs India and we don't need them; its technology we desperately need. If we have an F16 or an F18, it strengthens our capacity to deal with our neighbours in terms of potential threats. In terms of civil aviation, millions of jobs have been created in India. When you go to the nuclear sector, we have promised over time 274,000 megawatts in the next 15 years. Once the shift takes place from uranium to thorium, that becomes an even bigger play. As far as safe cities is concerned, our cities are prone to terrorist activities because we don't have the latest technological prowess. Just as the United States needs to sell its technology to create new jobs, that is their challenge of this decade, we need them as desperately to upgrade our economy...
What do you think will be the thrust areas during Locke's trip?
...One of the agendas of secretary Locke will be how does he get over the question of (civil nuclear) liability, which has been dogging the US and many other countries. Two: civil aviation. Air India was expected to have been supplied with 28 Boeing Dreamliners...Then there are Jet Airways, SpiceJet... Then you come to defence, which is the third item. We are looking at a global competition for medium multirole combat aircraft. Now the US has two of those in the competition—the F16 from Lockheed Martin and the F18 from Boeing...Then we come to ICT (information and communication technology), which is the fourth item...The key to ICT to them is technology driven—which is homeland security. India today is facing a massive Maoist insurgency, it is facing terrorism from across the border, so homeland security is a matter that is going to expand massively. All this means huge purchase of advanced, cutting-edge, newly developed homeland security material.
- Controversies won't affect Lokpal panel: Pranab11 mins ago
- Hindu directors may move court over ouster56 mins ago
- The Week in Review for 22 April 2011
- DoT for review of Trai recommendations to cancel 69 licences
- DGH to summon RIL next month on falling KG-D6 output
- Sebi to set rules for art funds, antique investments
12:23 AM | April 22,2011 Prime Minister Manmohan Singh says he wants the 12th Five Year Plan to fix new targets and tackle issues like energy and urbanization 05:24 PM | April 21,2011 It had banned shipments of iron ore from 10 ports and stopped its transport to other ports for exports in July last year, citing a drive against illegal mining and the need to preserve the raw material for local steelmakers 12:33 PM | April 21,2011 A bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice B S Chauhan cancelled their bail and directed them to surrender within this period, failing which the central investigative agency will take steps to arrest them | 01:15 AM | April 22,2011 The members of the ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA) on 15 April had disrupted the proceedings of the PAC, citing the JPC probe 11:40 PM | April 21,2011 Agency seeks details of bank transactions, foreign exchange, details of travels abroad since Feb 2005 11:20 PM | April 21,2011 None of the senior supervisors responsible for flight safety underwent any formal training in this specialized area, the report says |
04:44 PM | April 19,2011 Forecast to be reviewed in June; earlier forecasts have been for normal rains; 03:23 PM | April 19,2011 Food inflation has moderated to 8.28% for the week ending 1 April, 2011 from 9.18% in the previous reporting week 04:36 PM | April 18,2011 Procurement in major producing states of Haryana and Punjab, which generally starts from 1 April and picks up from 15 April, had been very low till Sunday because of less arrival of crop in the markets due to delay in harvesting | 01:15 AM | April 22,2011 Around 200 students, who had already been placed, were given an option to apply for the top-dollar jobs on offer, but only 18 pursued this option 12:16 AM | April 21,2011 India is on track to meet most of its Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) due to its strong growth since the 1980s, says the latest Global 04:4 PM | March 31,2011 In past 10 years, female literacy rate rose to 65.46% in 2011 from 53.67% in 2001; male literacy rose from 75.26% to 82.14% |
03:21 PM | April 22,2011 The estimate is way below the government's forecast of 9% growth in 2011-12 12:58 AM | April 22,2011 The death of student start-ups due to the shortage of financing and mentoring is intriguing because investors and mentors say they are open to helping such ventures; the problem, they say, is that students don't know much about the business they... 11:59 PM | April 21,2011 A detailed study by Crisil Ltd says that not only will Indian companies face a squeeze in their margins as the Reserve Bank of India progressively hikes policy rates, cut back in investments will force them to contend with a capacity constraint | 09:3 PM | April 07,2011 The project is important for the city as it will not only reduce the distance between Pune and city by at least forty five minutes but also provide better connectivity to the proposed second airport for city in Navi Mumbai 07:30 PM | April 01,2011 The Road Transport and Highways Ministry has requested the World Bank for financing the projects that include conversion of 20,000 km of state highways into national highways, besides upgrading 17,000 km of the latter 02:48 PM | April 01,2011 The BMRTSP has a total cost of $2.7 billion and is scheduled to be completed in 2013 |
"I think he should continue in the panel," leader of opposition in the assembly Siddaramiah of Congress told reporters here on Hegde's plan to quit in view of "malicious vilification campaign" against civil society members of the panel.
"You should not get disheartened by these attacks and should not quit the panel for any reason," JD-S state president and former Karnataka chief minister H.D. Kumaraswamy pleaded while talking to reporters here.
Hegde also came under pressure from the public to stay on in the panel, which is mandated to draft the Lokpal bill aimed at curbing corruption at the national level.
Hegde told reporters that he would announce his decision in New Delhi Saturday after talking to other civil society members on the panel, which also has five central ministers.
Carrying placards reading "We are with you", "Please do not quit the panel", and "India against corruption", around 100 people, many of them senior citizens, met Hegde at his residence in upscale Sadashivanagar locality in north Bangalore to express support for him.
Hegde, a retired judge of the Supreme Court, told them that he would not act in haste and only announce his decision Saturday.
Besides Hegde, the other four members are Gandhian Anna Hazare , social activist Arvind Kejrival and leading lawyers Shanti Bhushan and his son Prashant Bhushan .
The group members told reporters that Hegde had informed them he had not taken any decision and would consult other civil society members on the panel before finalizing his stand.
The Bhushans are caught in a CD controversy and also over alleged preferential land allotment to them in Uttar Pradesh.
Hegde said Thursday he was thinking of quitting the panel, upset at the "malicious vilification campaign" against him.
Digvijay Singh, a former Madhya Pradesh chief minister and now a Congress general secretary, Thursday questioned what Hegde had done to curb corruption in Karnataka.
This is the second time in a month that Hegde has come under attack from senior Congress leaders.
Central Law Minister M. Veerappa Moily had said March 19 that Hegde "starts a probe but does not complete it" and that "his actions against corruption are superficial".
The next day an angry Hegde ticked him off saying "I don't need a certificate from Veerappa Moily. It is enough if I get a certificate from the people of Karnataka".
Like Digvijay Singh "clarifying" his remarks, Moily too had written a letter to Hegde hoping that media reports would not spoil their long and cordial relationship.
-
- Disclosure of unaccounted money in Gujarat jumps to Rs 950 cr
- AHMEDABAD: The disclosure of unaccounted wealth during the Income Tax searches in FY10-11 in Gujarat stood at Rs 950.54 crore against Rs 576.51 crore last year, up by 64.86 per cent, a top Income Tax official said here today.
Twenty-eight searches were conducted in 2010-11 of which ten were at real estate developers.
"The admission of unaccounted wealth during searches was up by 64.86 per cent in 2010-11 as compared to the period a year ago," Director General Income Tax Investigation (DGIT) Gujarat region B N Dutta told reporters.
The assesses during searches admitted undisclosed income of Rs 950.54 crore against Rs 576.51 crore in a year ago period, he said adding that admissions per case stood at an average of Rs 33.95 crore against Rs 21.35 crore in the corresponding period.
"Ten real estate developers have admitted undisclosed income of Rs 565.80 crore, while a seizure of Rs 23.33 crore was made during searches on their premises," Dutta said.
"A Surat-based builder group made a maximum disclosure of Rs 129.60 crore in FY-10-11, while the second highest admission of unaccounted wealth of Rs 103.03 crore was by a infrastructure group," Dutta said.
The detection of undisclosed income stood at Rs 1,655.59 crore in FY-10-11 against Rs 977.20 crore in a year-ago period, he said.
The average per case detection of undisclosed income during the searches has also shot up to Rs 59.13 crore in FY10-11 as compared to Rs 36.19 crore in the period a year ago, Dutta said.
The national average of per case detection is Rs 19.86 crore. -
Related
Timeline of articles
Number of sources covering this storyBengal MP gheroed for distributing money, EC promises action2 hours ago - IBNLive.comLeft defeat on Sonia's mindApr 21, 2011 - Hindustan TimesCentral funds misused by Bengal govt: SoniaApr 20, 2011 - Hindustan TimesPranab attacks CPM, left, right and centreApr 20, 2011 - Hindustan TimesImages
$500 mn gambled away in Indo-Pak WC semi-final: Malcolm Speed
SYDNEY: The money gambled on cricket now is astronomical, and if former International Cricket Council (ICC) CEO Malcolm Speed is to be believed, at least 500 million dollars was gambled away during the recent World Cup semi-final between India and Pakistan in Mohali , India.
The Age quotes Speed as saying in his book "Sticky Wicket: A Decade of Change in World Cricket", that any game involving India attracts about 200 million dollars.
Betfair chief executive Andrew Twaits believes it would be naive to suggest approaches to players were confined to punters or bookmakers in illegal, unregulated markets.
He argues all states should adopt the Victorian requirement for all betting agencies to gain approval from the relevant sport and for all gambling operators to move towards an account-based betting regime.
''The transparency that an account-based model creates is a vital first step towards guarding against corruption in sport,'' Twaits said in a blog.
Speed adds: "The other vital ingredient is for there to be specific criminal penalties for those involved in gambling-related corruption whether those allegations relate to outright match-fixing or spot-fixing or trading with the benefit of price-sensitive information.''
Speed, now executive director of the Coalition of Major Professional and Participation Sports, is expected to recommend both of those things in a research paper in its final drafting stages.
Lord Paul Condon, the former chief of the ICC's anti-corruption unit, told the ICC board in 2009 the absence of the council's investigators from that season's Indian Premier League called into question the integrity of the event. He also expressed concern about the party atmosphere, which enabled easy access to players.
ICC investigators now have a presence at the IPL and the Twenty20 Champions League, in which CA has a financial stake.Govt planning 100% FDI in sea plane operations Government is planning 100 per cent foreign direct investment in sea plane operations as there is scope of phenomenal growth of sea plane, general aviation and helicopter travel.
"With India having a long coast line, there is a need for concerted efforts to promote sea plane operations. They are significant for the economy of islands like Anadaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep," said S N A Zaidi, Civil Aviation Secretary while addressing a seminar on "Operations of Sea plane in India".
The seminar was organised by Pawan Hans Helicopters Limited which has started the country's first sea-plane operations -- Jal Hans -- in Andamans and Nicobar Islands.
He said that after general aviation and helicopter operations, there is scope of phenomenal growth of sea plane operations in India.
To promote the sector, the Civil Aviation Ministry has created a separate department to look after the matters related to infrastructure, safety, security and regulatory issues.
This would take care of disposal of cases related to cost and time of transactions in this sector, Zaidi said adding the the Ministry was strengthening the regulatory authority with the setting up of Civil Aviation Authority.
The Civil Aviation Secretary said there was a requirement of over 1,000 sea planes world wide in next decade and "10 per cent of them should come to India".
Manufacturers like Donier, Viking and Russia BE 200 Jets also said there was tremendous scope for sea plane operations in India.
The Age quotes Speed as saying in his book "Sticky Wicket: A Decade of Change in World Cricket", that any game involving India attracts about 200 million dollars.
Betfair chief executive Andrew Twaits believes it would be naive to suggest approaches to players were confined to punters or bookmakers in illegal, unregulated markets.
He argues all states should adopt the Victorian requirement for all betting agencies to gain approval from the relevant sport and for all gambling operators to move towards an account-based betting regime.
''The transparency that an account-based model creates is a vital first step towards guarding against corruption in sport,'' Twaits said in a blog.
Speed adds: "The other vital ingredient is for there to be specific criminal penalties for those involved in gambling-related corruption whether those allegations relate to outright match-fixing or spot-fixing or trading with the benefit of price-sensitive information.''
Speed, now executive director of the Coalition of Major Professional and Participation Sports, is expected to recommend both of those things in a research paper in its final drafting stages.
Lord Paul Condon, the former chief of the ICC's anti-corruption unit, told the ICC board in 2009 the absence of the council's investigators from that season's Indian Premier League called into question the integrity of the event. He also expressed concern about the party atmosphere, which enabled easy access to players.
ICC investigators now have a presence at the IPL and the Twenty20 Champions League, in which CA has a financial stake.
"With India having a long coast line, there is a need for concerted efforts to promote sea plane operations. They are significant for the economy of islands like Anadaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep," said S N A Zaidi, Civil Aviation Secretary while addressing a seminar on "Operations of Sea plane in India".
The seminar was organised by Pawan Hans Helicopters Limited which has started the country's first sea-plane operations -- Jal Hans -- in Andamans and Nicobar Islands.
He said that after general aviation and helicopter operations, there is scope of phenomenal growth of sea plane operations in India.
To promote the sector, the Civil Aviation Ministry has created a separate department to look after the matters related to infrastructure, safety, security and regulatory issues.
This would take care of disposal of cases related to cost and time of transactions in this sector, Zaidi said adding the the Ministry was strengthening the regulatory authority with the setting up of Civil Aviation Authority.
The Civil Aviation Secretary said there was a requirement of over 1,000 sea planes world wide in next decade and "10 per cent of them should come to India".
Manufacturers like Donier, Viking and Russia BE 200 Jets also said there was tremendous scope for sea plane operations in India.
- [DOC]
Democracy and Market Economy in India : An Interrelational Study
File Format: Microsoft Word - Quick View
by A Chatterjee - Related articles
The initiation of free market economy in India raised a few eyebrows. The essence of market economy, opined critics, lies in the exclusion of marginal ...
fr.pekea-fr.org/Rennes/T-Chatterjee.doc - Similar -
Free Market Economy | Economy Watch
Free Market Economy is now an accepted form of MarketEconomy and can be found in USA, UK, Canada and Germany as also in developing nations like India and ...
www.economywatch.com/market-economy/free-market-economy.html- Cached - Similar -
Market Economy | Economy Watch
The market economy operates under the free market where the basic assumption ...
www.economywatch.com/market-economy/ - Cached - Similar -
Free market economy has given India real hope: Guy Sorman ...
7 Jul 2010 ... The last 20 years of liberalised growth might have created 'two Indias' in his own words, but renowned French economist Guy Sorman believes ...
www.hindustantimes.com/Free-market-economy...India.../Article1-568767.aspx - Cached - Similar -
Why is free market economy considered as ''self correcting ...
8 answers - 3 Sep 2010Because it's free of influence from the government or other entities. So supply and demand keep everything in check. ... The idea of a self correcting market is ...
in.answers.yahoo.com › ... › Social Science › Economics -Cached - Similar -
DEVELOPMENT-INDIA: Democracy In Conflict WithFree Market Policy ...
24 Jan 2008 ... DEVELOPMENT-INDIA Democracy In Conflict With Free Market Policy ... Since the 'opening' up of the Indianeconomy two decades ago, ...
ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40900 - Cached - Similar -
India Stumbles in Rush to a Free Market Economy - New York Times
15 Aug 1992 ... India's struggle to restructure its economy is faltering, threatening to drag South Asia's largest country deeper into poverty and ...
www.nytimes.com › ... › ECONOMIC TIMES -Cached - Similar - Add to iGoogle -
India's free market economy | Indian EconomicsJournal
Ever since the liberalization movement came about in the 1990s,India has been well on the road to free market economy. Earlier, Indian economy was largely ...
indianeconomics.org/india-free-market-economy.htm - Cached-
<B>N Chandra Mohan:</B> Two-way trade street
Business Standard - 1 day agoA good report is the recent Deloitte-FICCI white paper on "IndiaAsean Free Trade Agreement: Implications for India's Economy" that argues that the success ... -
Council on Foreign Relations: 'Free-Markets Need Our Help' .
Right Side News - 8 minutes agoFree-Market Analysis: This thoughtful article that Chrystia Freeland has ... reduction in such countries as China and India and "more is yet to come. ... -
Specialised MBA: Banking, Fin Services & Insurance sector
MBAUniverse.com - 9 hours ago
It's a benign feat for India to achieve the way its economy kept growing amidst ... Hence, the financial market of the country was on the right track at the ... -
US entrepreneurs urged to invest in Lanka
Business Line - 3 days ago
Highlighting the India-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement, the Minister told a group ... which includes economies such as South Africa and Vietnam," he added. ... -
The Indian Rupee
FXstreet.com - Valentina Claudia Autiero - 4 days ago
By introducing a free market economy, India generated a 7% average annual growth since 1997, in the last fiscal year the GDP advanced 7,2% and in the first ... -
For India, challenge is to ensure stable foreign inflows
Economic Times - 12 Apr 2011Where does India, a prominent emerging market, along with Brazil, stand? Probably, between the devil and the deep sea. The emerging economies of Brazil, ... -
Fight Imperialist Neo-liberalism
People's Democracy - Sukomal Sen - 9 hours ago
There was hardly a free-market media system where the governments intervened ... in the United States and worldwide over including India in the past decade. ... -
Labor left holding the ashes
The Australian - Michael Stutchbury - 3 hours ago
That is, the rules support generous risk-free regulated rates of return on ... Combet's suggestion that countries such as China, the US and India are in ... -
Mr inflation and the Kafka economy
Tehelka - Shailendra Pandey - 8 Apr 2011
He attempts to articulate the views of those who disagree with the contention of traditionaleconomics — that the current system offree-market capitalism ...
-
Asia's where the action is, so wake up, Australia
Sydney Morning Herald - Matt Wade - 1 day ago
By comparison four Asian countries - China, Japan, India and South Korea - received ... Notwithstanding the US-Australia freetrade deal, signed with great ...
Stay up to date on these results:
-
When asked if they would prefer another term for the Left Front or is it time for a change of government, 38% voters said they preferred another term for the Left, but 53% said they favour change. That confirms the reading of most poll pundits.
When asked whom they favour as the state's next chief minister, Mamata Banerjee was a clear favourite with the people of Bengal. The railways minister polled 49% of the votes to Buddhadeb's 20. Six per cent said they would rather have Pranab Mukherjee as CM.
It follows that people are deeply disappointed with Buddhadeb's performance as CM, with 27% rating his performance as poor. Another 27% believe it is average. And 13% have judged it very poor. Twenty-two per cent of the voters though have rated Buddha rule as good.
What will come as a rude shock also for the chief minister is the fact that between him and Jyoti Basu, 56% prefer Basu over Buddhadeb. Buddhadeb polls a dismal 13 % of the votes.
Even as Buddha's ratings collapse, Mamata's are rising. Asked to rate her performance as railway minister, an overwhelming 74% of voters said it is good. Only 18% believe it is bad.
When asked how good or bad a chief minister Mamata will prove to be, 25% said she will be very good, 29% said she will be good. Nineteen per cent though are willing to bet she will be bad.
Asked whether Trinamool's Singur/Nandigram agitations were pro or anti-people, 54% said it was pro-people. Thirty-four said it was anti-people.
Despite what happened to the Nano, 62% of people believe industries will not flee Bengal in a Mamata regime. Twenty-four say they will.
In fact, 52% believe that Kolkata has fallen behind other metros because of Left's policies.
The Trinamool's alleged connection with Naxalites isn't a big problem for the voting public. Twenty-nine per cent believe it will work in favour of the party. Twenty-seven per cent say it will work against the party, while forty-four per cent decided not to hazard a guess on the matter.
Finally here's a look at what Headlines Today-ORG are projecting for the 2011 elections to West Bengal.
In 2011, the ORG projects the Left will get 43% of the vote share, 44% for Trinamool and allies and 12% for others. ORG projects Trinamool and allies will get 182 seats, the Left will get 101 seats, and others 11.
ORG have been careful to qualify their prediction of a Mamata Banerjee victory by noting that the difference in vote share between the two alliances is not as large as is the public impression. What is working for Mamata is a palpable, consuming desire: after three decades of the Left, the voter wants change.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/story/mamata-has-edge-in-west-bengal-opinion-poll/1/133957.html
Fifty constituencies in second phase of election in Bengal
Press Trust of India, Updated: April 22, 2011 22:46 IST
Vista 90 is Here – The Most Powerful Petrol Hatch in its Class.Blink it & You'll Miss it
The three districts where election would be held are Murshidabad having 22 seats, Birbhum--11 and Nadia--17. In all 11,531 polling stations have been set up.
Tight security arrangements have been made in all three districts to ensure free, fair and peaceful election.
Police sources said about 4800 security personnel including central para-military personnel have been deployed in the three districts.
Defying the party's warning, four rebel Congress candidates backed by party MP Adhir Chowdhury are contesting as independents in Murshidabad district and an equal number of dissidents are in the fray in Nadia. All of them have been suspended by the party.
Congress president Sonia Gandhi and union Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee, an MP from Murshidabad and Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee campaigned in the districts urging voters not to vote for any rebel candidate and utilise the opportunity to oust the Left Front government.
Prominent Left leaders who campaigned included Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in Nadia besides CPIM politburo member Biman Bose and Housing minister Gautam Deb.
BJP veteran L K Advani and party chief Nitin Gadkari also took part in the campaigning.
The main poll plank of Trinamool Congress-Congress combine is for ushering in 'paribartan' (political change) in the state ruled by CPIM-led Left Front for the last 34 years.
Chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee has ridiculed the slogan for change.
Prominent candidates whose fate would be decided are Union Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee's son Abhijit Mukherjee from Nalhati, Panchayat minister and CPI(M) leader Anisur Rehman, former High Court judge Nure Alam Chowdhury contesting on Trinamool Congress ticket from Murarai and Rukbanur Rehman, brother of computer graphics teacher Rizwanur Rehman from the Chapra constituency.
CPIM has fielded candidates in 31 seats followed by TC in 29 and Congress in 21 seats. BJP has put up nominees in all the 50 constituencies and Bahujan Samaj Party in 27 seats.
For NDTV Updates, follow us on Twitter or join us on Facebook
Read more at: http://www.ndtv.com/article/assembly%20polls/fifty-constituencies-in-second-phase-of-election-in-bengal-100863?cp
RelatedTimeline of articles Number of sources covering this story
Images |
Shanti Bhushan refuses to comment on CD controversy
Eminent lawyer Shanti Bhushan today refused to comment on the CD controversy which has led to a certain section demand his resignation from the joint committee to draft the Lokpal Bill.
"I do not want to give any interview. I don't want to talk (on the issue)," Bhushan said when reporters asked him for comments on the CD controversy.
The co-chairman of the joint drafting committee of the Lokpal Bill arrived here to contest a case of Noida Power Company at the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court.
The case was lodged in 2008. He was present during the one-and-a-half hour hearing by Justices Uma Nath Singh and Satish Chandra, who fixed May 12 as the next date for hearing.
The former law minister also went to meet members of Awadh Bar Association on its request.
Bhushans should quit Lokpal drafting panel: Mayawati
Wading into the raging controversy involving the Lokpal Bill drafting committee members, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati today virtually demanded resignation of the Bhushans .
"The committee should distance itself from those whose integrity is doubted," she said, without naming anyone in the wake of the CD controversy involving lawyer Shanti Bhushan and property allotments to him.
Shanti Bhushan and his son Prashant are both members of the 10-member committee.
At a press conference, she also demanded inclusion of an "apolitical scheduled caste member" in the committee.
"Of the 10 members including those of civil society, there is not member of scheduled caste in the drafting committee. We want the committee to be re-organised and an apolitical scheduled caste member included in it," she said.
Alleging that Congress forgot to include an SC member in the committee "due to its casteist mentality", Mayawati said the party has ignored the caste on important occasions.
She said Anna Hazare should have discussed before giving names of drafting committee members.
"How could he forget to include the name of an SC member in the committee when Maharashtra, the state to which he belongs, has witnessed a number of social agitations for giving rights to the community?" she asked.
She also said that Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar also belonged to Hazare's state.
Welcoming Hazare's anti-corruption agitation, she said BSP has been fighting corruption and criminalisation and was determined to root them out from the society.
"The evil of corruption and criminalisation has become chronic in the state due to previous governments. BSP will root them out but it will take time," she added.
A Division Bench of Chief Justice S J Mukhopadhaya and Justice Akil Kureshi reserved the ruling after the state Government completed its argument where it questioned the locus standi of Jan Sangharsh Manch (JSM), the NGO which had sought questioning of Modi, in the matter.
JSM had approached the High Court last year seeking quashing of the Nanavati Commission's order of not summoning Modi, and issuing summons to the BJP leader and three others for cross-examination with regard to the communal riots.
Today, Advocate General Kamal Trivedi argued that JSM, which represents some of the riot victims, had no locus standi to seek summoning of Modi. He demanded that the NGO's plea be rejected by the court.
JSM counsel Mukul Sinha submitted that the State had no right to oppose his plea as it was the Government which amended the terms of reference of the Commission in June 2002 for inquiring into the role and conduct of the Chief Minister and other Ministers with regard to the riots.
Therefore, Sinha, submitted, it was absolutely necessary to summon the Chief Minister and others.
During an earlier hearing, Sinha had maintained that by not summoning the CM and other Ministers, the entire amended terms of reference would be nullified.
He had argued that summoning of Modi and others was required for collecting evidence with regard to the Godhra train burning incident and subsequent riots.
FX reserves $307.917 billion as of April 15
: India's foreign exchange reserves fell to $307.917 billion as of April 15 from $308.203 billion in the previous week, the central bank said in its weekly statistical supplement on Friday.
Changes in foreign currency assets, expressed in dollar terms, include the effect of appreciation or depreciation of other currencies held in its reserves like the euro, sterling and yen, the central bank said.
Foreign exchange reserves include India's Reserve Tranche position in the International Monetary Fund ( IMF )), the central bank said.
POSCO
Featured photoPosco posts sharp drop in Q1 net profitAFP - 6 hours ago SEOUL - South Korea's top steelmaker Posco said on Friday that first-quarter net profit dropped by a third because of increased costs of... Images |
| Timeline of articles Number of sources covering this story
Images |
Insisting that the Public Sector Units (PSUs) should procure at least 20 per cent of their requirements from the 2.6 crore small and medium units, the MSME Ministry has sought Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's intervention in the matter.
The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) are demanding that the government should make it mandatory for all government departments, public sector units and state-funded infrastructure projects to purchase 20 per cent of their requirements from the sector.
The government now procures a meager volume of 4 to 5 per cent from MSMEs, out of its annual Rs 1,70,000 crore purchase.
"We have asked them (Prime Minister and Finance Ministry) to look into the demand of the industry," MSME Minister Virbhadra Singh told PTI here.
According to the industry experts, government agencies impose criteria during bidding like minimum turnover and special brands, which the sector finds difficult to fulfill.
Singh also said that the sector has a huge potential to boost India's exports and compete with other foreign markets.
MSME contributes over 40 per cent to the country's total exports, which stood at USD 246 billion in 2010-11 and 45 per cent to manufacturing output.
Meanwhile, MSME Secretary Uday Kumar Varma said that the sector was facing challenges like availability of easy credit, modern technology, proper marketing of products and skill development in its growth.
"The level of funding is still not sufficient. We need to work upon it," Varma said.
The sector employs about 60 million people and contributes 8 per cent to the country's GDP.
22 APR, 2011, 06.53AM IST,ET BUREAU
Takeover panel, industry discuss new M&A rules
NEW DELHI: The Takeover Regulations Advisory Committee , chaired by chief economic advisor Kaushik Basu , met industry representatives on Thursday to discuss the amendments in the new mergers and acquisitions code as proposed by the C Achuthan-led Sebi panel .
"We have received comments from all parties. The government will now review these recommendations. If required we may hold another meeting before finalising the new norms," said a senior government official. The meeting was also attended by senior officials from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Securities and Exchange Board of India .
While industry bodies, such as FICCI, have supported raising of the initial acquisition threshold to 25% from the current trigger of 15%, the cost accounting body ICAI has suggested that the limit should be kept at 15%. "We have argued that this will lead to hostile takeover threat to listed companies with lower promoter shareholding," said Vinod Jain, chairman of the committee on financial markets and investor protection, ICAI.
CII opposed the proposal which requires board of directors of a target company to appoint a committee of independent directors to provide recommendations to the shareholders on the open offer . "Increased liabilities for independent directors may have the effect of further discouraging competent and experienced individuals from assuming (the post of) independent directors of listed companies, which would be detrimental to the overall interests of corporate governance," said CII in its presentation.
There were also divergent views on allowing open offer for 100% of the shares with ICAI opposing the move on grounds that this will result in more companies getting delisted. This will reduce the market cap of Indian companies and investors will have lesser investment opportunities. All participants also suggested to the government that there should be clearer definition of 'control' and the need to harmonise the new Takeover Code with the requirements of merger regulation under the Competition Law.
Indian Railways need a makeover
Raghu Dayal, Former CMD, Concor
It is passenger operation which helps people at large connect with Indian Railways (IR) and its pervasive ubiquity. Trains like the Himsagar , with its 75-hour 3,745-km long journey from Jammu to Kanyakumari, or the Dwarka, hurtling along a 3,296-km stretch from Guwahati to Okha, testify to what Paul Theroux perceived as "the railway possessed India and made her hugeness graspable".
And yet, passenger services have generally been viewed by IR management largely as social service obligation. Passenger business have inflicted an annual loss of over 20,000 crore. Earnings of 23,488 crore from passenger traffic in 2009-10 accounted for only 27% of IR's gross revenues; freight earnings of 58,502 crore contributed 65%.
Passenger business worldwide accounted for 57%, and freight 43% of the $313 billion global rail market (in 2005). Not that railway passenger business is inherently loss-making. On IR, it is the ordinary second-class segment that is the major culprit; upper classes (AC I, II, III, chair car, first) account for only 1% of total number of rail passengers, 6% of passenger kilometres, yet 24% of passenger revenues, and more than pay for themselves.
With inexplicable obduracy, IR prices its services irrationally low, besides being riddled with a myriad unwarranted concessions and free passes. The second class mail/express fare was 23.1 paise/per km in 2000-01; it remained stubbornly stuck at 23.2 paise even in 2008-09. The ordinary second-class fare, largely responsible for loss-making, has remained untenably low at 14.9 paise/per km, and suburban travel still lower, at 12.9 paise/ per km. The fare on state road transport services in 2008-09 averaged 48.37 paise/per km.
While about 10 million passengers in India travel by air in a month, IR transports twice as many in a day. Even so, IR accounts for a meagre 12% of India's total passenger traffic, roads carrying over 87%. Cost-effective rail travel demand, far outstripping supply, will further grow substantially in view of the country's declining agriculture sector driving migration from rural areas for an integrated national labour market. The urban population is projected to rise from current 286 million to 575 million by 2030, keeping the foot-loose population on the move. Also, the spectre of climate change favour IR to reposition rail travel in preference to car and airlines.
For IR, therefore, it can no longer be business-as-usual. Considering historical growth rates and crippling capacity constraints, RITES' projection of 7,189 million inter-city passengers by 2025-26 against 2,835 million passengers in 2007-08 is too conservative. If GDP grows 8% or more, annual demand for transport generally rises 10-12%, implying the number of originating non-suburban rail passengers exceeding 12,000 million by 2025.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/comments-analysis/indian-railways-need-a-makeover/articleshow/8052803.cms
6 MAR, 2011, 07.25PM IST,PTI
'Indian economy expected to reach $ 6 trillion by 2020'
COIMBATORE: Former ISRO chairman and Planning Commission member K Kasturirangan today said if India sustains a nine per cent GDP growth then by 2020 its economy is expected to approach $ six trillion.
Kasturirangan said that the size of Indian economy would expand close to $ 1.8 trillion in the next 2-3 years.
"If the present expectations which are reasonable and realistic, fructify, India is poised to become a world power," he said.
"If we maintain the present rate of growth of GDP at around nine per cent, by the end of the present decade, 2020, this economy is expected to approach $ six trillion, with per capita GDP crossing $ 4,500 from the present $ 1,500", Kasturirangan said in his Graduation Day address at Kumaraguru College of Technology here.
"If all goes well," the economy could even grow to 9-10 $ trillion and per capita income could rise to in excess of $ 6,000 by 2025, he said.
Talking about India's space programme, Kasturirangan said since its inception, the secret behind its success has been "team work".
"India is globally recognised today as a significant space faring nation. This is the result of teamwork in facing several challenges squarely and maintaining focus on our goals," he said.
In the case of India, the role of technology is important since we became independent from colonial rule only about six decades ago and the need for development on several fronts is acute, he said.
India targets lower deficit, higher farm output to tame prices
Stubbornly high inflation could be tamed through reducing its fiscal deficit and boosting farm output, deputy chairman of the Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia said, as mounting price pressures threaten to slow the economy.
Headline inflation surged to nearly 9 percent in March, far above forecasts, on higher fuel and manufacturing prices, prompting calls for aggressive rate hikes by the Reserve Bank of India.
"We identified that the revival of inflationary pressures is one of the weak points in the global economic situation and in our own situation," said Ahluwalia after the commission's meeting.
"The solution to that lies in having a proper fiscal balance. I have already said that we totally endorse bringing the fiscal deficit under control plus very good performance in agriculture," he said.
Ahluwalia, an influential adviser to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh , said he expects average annual inflation in the five years to end-March 2017 to be 5 percent.
The government aims to cut its fiscal deficit to 4.6 percent of GDP in the current fiscal year through March 2012 from 5.1 percent a year ago. Farm output is expected to grow at least 4 percent in 2011/12 from an estimated 5.6 percent growth in the previous fiscal year.
Prime Minister Singh on Thursday held a meeting of the Commission to set out India's economic policy path for the five years to end-March 2017.
Analysts have been trimming their near-term growth forecasts for Asia's third-largest economy, citing high inflation and prospects of higher interest rates.
New Delhi expects the economy to grow at around 9 percent in the financial year that began on April 1. But private economists expect the economy to grow at a slower pace than an expected 8.6 percent expansion in the fiscal year that ended in March.
Goldman Sachs on Thursday cut its India growth forecast to 7.8 percent from 8.7 percent for this fiscal year. The Wall Street bank raised its inflation forecast for the fiscal year that began this month to 7.5 percent from 6.7 percent.
"We now expect the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to hike policy rates by another 125 bp (basis point) in 2011, significantly higher than market expectations," it added.
The RBI has raised its main lending rate eight times since March 2010 and is expected to deliver another hike of at least 25 bps in its May policy review
Fast-growing India is prone to inflation after years of underinvestment in everything from power and roads to agriculture and education, which creates capacity constraints that will take years to rectify and leave the economy vulnerable to shocks like a bad harvest or a spike in coal prices.
Singh asked the Commission to target 9-9.5 percent annual economic growth in the five years to March 2017, higher than an estimated 8.2 percent average annual growth between April 2007 and March 2012.
20 APR, 2011, 07.02AM IST,ET BUREAU
Exports grow fastest since Independence
NEW DELHI: India's exports surged 37.5% in 2010-11-their fastest annual growth since independence-despite a strong rupee and weak demand in developed markets, data released on Tuesday showed.
The country shipped goods worth $245.9 billion during the year as attempts to diversify markets and increase regional trade paid off. Exports surpassed the government's initial target of $200 billion. "This is the highest annual percentage growth in exports (in dollar terms)," Commerce Minister Anand Sharma said.
An emboldened government has set an export target of $450 billion for 2013-14. It will target a 25% rise in exports in the current fiscal. Exports in March added to $29.1 billion, highest for a single month so far. The base effect, however, contributed to a part of the rise.
Exports had fallen 3.5% in 2009-10 because of the global financial crisis. Robust growth in exports and slower rise in imports helped the government contain trade deficit at $104 billion as against a worrying mid-year estimate of $130 billion.
New Markets Drive Growth
Imports rose 21.5% to $350.5 billion in 2010-11. The strong growth was driven by higher exports to new markets in Latin America, Africa and Asia.
"There was a slump in global demand in 2009 and the initial months of 2010, especially in the traditional markets, and we felt that there was a need to reach out to new destinations," the minister said. The government had announced incentives for shipments to 41 markets, most of which were new trading destinations for the country. Exports to Latin America were up 74% in the first three quarters of 2010-11 compared with the year-ago numbers while those to African countries jumped 50%.
Exports to the EU and US-traditional markets for Indian merchandise-grew a more modest 22.6% and 26.4%, respectively. "Most of the growth has come from new markets in Latin America, Africa and also Asia, which has now emerged as the main market for India's exports," said Ajay Sahai, director-general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations . The thrust on new markets is likely to continue in the export strategy to be announced by the commerce ministry later this month, which will aim at increasing the country's exports to $450 billion over the next three years.
"Countries in Latin America and Africa are the growth poles of the world," said Biswajit Dhar, director-general of Delhi-based think tank Research and Information System for Developing Countries. "It is good that we are managing to get in there as they would be the fastest-expanding markets." Engineering exports rose 85% to $60.5 billion in the year, accounting for onefourth of total exports. Petroleum, oil and lubricant exports also posted an impressive growth of 50.6% to $42.5 billion.
Other sectors that performed well include gems & jewellery, textiles, electronics, chemicals and drugs & pharmaceuticals. "The shift from low- to high-end exports has also helped the cause," said Shubhada Rao, chief economist with Yes Bank . The growth was despite the rupee remaining reasonably strong through the year. The currency appreciated the most in October 2010, reaching an average exchange price of Rs 44.41 to a dollar. "Exporters have managed to survive when the dollar had fallen to Rs 39. The current situation is not a problem," Sahai said. However, Dhar cautioned against complacency.
"There is a sense of complacency that we can absorb any amount of hot money, which is not correct," he said. "We have to take steps to check it as the global market is very competitive and to maintain high growth we have to take all possible steps." India's crude oil imports rose 16.7% to $101.7 billion; machinery 19% to $27.2 billion; pearls, gems & jewellery 72.8% to $28.2 billion; and electronics 3.6% to 21.7%. The final import figure could go up by $5-10 billion.
The actual figure is not yet available due to a software problem. "The current account deficit could be in the neighbourhood of 2.5% to 2.7% (of GDP), but we have to wait for the finance ministry to give us the final figures after taking into account services exports and invisibles," Commerce Secretary Rahul Khullar said.
20 APR, 2011, 01.18PM IST, URMI A GOSWAMI,ET BUREAU
Twelfth plan: Government looks to establish clean image with inclusive growth agenda
NEW DELHI: The beleaguered UPA government is looking to re-establish its aam aadmi credentials in its Twelfth plan approach paper. With an eye to countering its tarnished image, the government is expected to focus on needs of the marginalised as expected to give special on its inclusive growth agenda.
As part of this, the Plan's approach paper is likely to address livelihood issues of tribals and other marginalised forest-dependent population. This is likely to include the proposal to introduce a minimum support price for minor forest produce like bamboo and tendu leaves.
In most areas, the collection and sale of minor forest produce provides the mainstay for the livelihood of tribals and other forest dwellers. Improving earnings will have both an economic impact but also provide the basis of a response to the stranglehold Maoist have in the forest areas. This is perhaps another reason why the long standing demand of a minimum support price for minor forest produce is finally gaining momentum.
Even as the preparations for the Twelfth plan period are underway, the environment ministry is moving ahead with its efforts and ground work to ensure a minimum support price (MSP) is fixed for minor forest produce (MFP) . Environment minister Jairam Ramesh has reiterated his ministry's commitment to work with the Planning Commission, ministries of tribal affairs and panchayati raj to make this possible.
The idea of fixing a minimum support price for minor forest produce is not new, as Ramesh points out, it "comes up frequently in the Prime Minister's meetings on Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas Act." The environment minister has said that he will pursue the issue with the finance ministry.
As a first step, in March Ramesh wrote to state chief ministers to declare bamboo as minor forest produce. Bamboo is among the more profitable of the forest produce. By seeking its classification as a minor forest produce the government is giving control over the produce to the local people and the village assemblies thereby improving their incomes. Legally, the gram sabha or the village assembly has control over minor forest produce.
The move has been described by deputy chairman Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia described Ramesh's effort as "a decisive move in the right direction" which would "go a long way in providing justice to the tribal and forest dwelling communities."
As a next step, Ramesh has written to deputy chairman Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia about the consensus plan that has been worked out together with member sectretary Planning Commission, and T Haque, who heads the committee on minor forest produce set up by the panchayati raj ministry.
It has been agreed that MSP must be fixed by a central committee to serve as a bench mark for the states. State government are free to fix a price which is higher than the benchmark. In its interim report the Haque committee , set up in August last year, recommended constituting a central agency to fix MSP for the produce collected from forests.
The Haque committee, which is expected to submit its final report soon, suggested the minimum price should take into consideration wages paid under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, transportation cost, value addition to the produce and local market prices. Ramesh has argued that since these areas fall within the purview Schedule V of the Constitution, the Centre has the power to step in and introduce MSP for minor forest produce.
The committee's interim report had identified ten products for which MSP would be set. This excluded bamboo and tendu leaves, both of which proved to contentious, as it is currently the monopoly of state governments. Ramesh has opted to move ahead under the power that the PESA gives the Centre. He lists out the twelve products identified in the discussions, which will be taken up by the central committee. These include bamboo, tendu leaves, wild honey, tamarind, mahuwa flower and seed, sal leaf and seed, lac, chironjee, gum karaya, myrobalan and karanj.
To ensure more money in the hands of tribals and other forest dwellers, it is suggested that monopoly, even that of state agencies, on purchase of minor forest produce, including tendu and bamboo, be removed. Doing away with this monopoly to improve prices has been suggested by the Haque committee. At present, the more valuable items of minor forest produce such as bamboo and tendu can only be sold to state government bodies.
While tribals can collect and utilise these minor forest products, the aggregation, processing, value addition and marketing of MFP is in the hands of local contractors, forest officials, and forest produce marketing federations. This allows for the exploitation of local population, who earn very little for their efforts. This will also help towards the actualising the gram sabha's control over minor forest produce as laid out in the Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas Act, 1996 and Forest Rights Act, 2006.
To this end, it has been decided that the gram sabhas must be empowered to take on a more proactive role in the management and regeneration of minor forest produce. Forest regeneration plans will have to be prepared with the full participation of the gram sabhas.
As part of the effort to improve livelihoods, it is felt that state agencies should be committed to buy all minor forest produce, rather than restricting to the more profitable ones. To give an impetus, all transportation barriers in movement of these products need to be removed. Also basic value addition of MFPs should take place at the village level, and units to ensure this must be established.
Ramesh has assured Ahluwalia of co-operation by the environment ministry. "Reforms in forest administration necessitated as part of the initiative will be given the highest priority." The environment ministry had been approached by the Planning Commission to prepare management plans for minor forest produce and ensure technical support through the forest departments in imparting scientific practices for planning and extracting forest products that will lead to "significant increase in production with concomitant increase in incomes of tribals and other inhabitants of interior areas".
In putting these measures in place the government hopes will lead not only to improved incomes, but prevent the exploitation of tribals, and help stem a steady revenue stream for the Maoists. hold of Left wing extremism in these areas.
Supreme Court wants explaination from Planning Commission about BPL percentage
The Supreme Court Wednesday slammed the Planning Commission, asking its Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to explain how was the percentage of people living below poverty line (BPL) fixed at 36 percent and how has their purchasing power remained unchanged since 1991.
An apex court bench of Justice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice Deepak Verma asked Ahluwalia to file within a week an affidavit explaining the Planning Commission's position.
The court said several states, including Congress-ruled states, have disputed the 36 percent figure and argued that the people living below poverty line were much more in numbers.
The court said that "you (India) are a powerful economy. Yet, starvation deaths are taking place in many parts of the country. What a stark contradiction in our approach. How can there be two Indias?"
The court's observation came in the wake of the hearing of a petition by Peopls'e Union of Civil Liberties which contended that adequate foodgrain were not being given to the people living below the poverty line. It also challenged the Planning Commission estimates of the BPL families.
News Results for Planning commission
India targets lower deficit, higher farm output to tame prices
2011-04-22 10:48:35.0 ... Planning commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia said, as mounting price pressures threaten to slow the economy.Headline inflation s
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/india-targets-lower-deficit-higher-farm-output-to-tame-prices/articleshow/8054628.cms
India to outpace China as fastest growing nation by 2015: ICICI
2011-04-22 04:33:58.0 ... Planning commission is looking at 9-9.5 per cent GDP growth for the the 12th Plan period (2012-2017), from 8.2 per cent in the
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/india-to-outpace-china-as-fastest-growing-nation-by-2015-icici/articleshow/8049412.cms
Spend checks, resource levelling seen in Twelfth Five Year Plan
2011-04-22 03:56:44.0 ... Planning commission noted the resource constraint and the need to prioritise some sectors over others. "Resources available wi
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/spend-checks-resource-levelling-seen-in-twelfth-five-year-plan/articleshow/8052355.cms
Prime Minister says expects 8.2% growth in 5-yr period to March 2012
2011-04-21 16:30:44.0 ... Planning commission meeting called to set out India's economic policy path for the next five years to end-March 2017.The gover
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/prime-minister-says-expects-82-growth-in-5-yr-period-to-march-2012/articleshow/8046963.cms
Environment Ministry working to fetch minor forest produce
2011-04-21 04:53:35.0 ... Planning Panel and ministries of Tribal Affairs and Panchayati Raj to finalise a road map for working out a support price. Ramesh has writ
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/environment-ministry-working-to-fetch-minor-forest-produce/articleshow/8043158.cms
Ministers' panel to look into FDI in pharma sector
2011-04-21 03:25:06.0 ... Planning commission member," said a DIPP official. DIPP is the nodal FDI policy-making body. India had opened its pharmaceutic
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/ministers-panel-to-look-into-fdi-in-pharma-sector/articleshow/8042819.cms
10% growth not feasible, 12th plan to target 9-9.5%: Montek
2011-04-21 03:06:47.0 ... Planning commission is likely to set a realistic average growth target of 9% for the 12th plan, despite some early enthusiasm
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/10-growth-not-feasible-12th-plan-to-target-9-95-montek/articleshow/8042749.cms
SC seeks explanation from Plan Panel about BPL percentage, expresses unhappiness
2011-04-21 02:38:58.0 ... Planning commission to explain the rationale behind the criteria determining the BPL categories of the people to get the benef
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sc-seeks-explanation-from-plan-panel-about-bpl-percentage-expresses-unhappiness/articleshow/8042641.cms
10% not feasible, 12th Plan to target 9-9.5% GDP: Montek
2011-04-20 20:29:49.0 ... Planning commission . Prime Minister Manmohan Singh wants the commission to aim at higher growth targe
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/10-not-feasible-12th-plan-to-target-9-95-gdp-montek/articleshow/8039071.cms
Supreme Court wants explaination from Planning Commission about BPL percentage
2011-04-20 13:41:46.0 ... Planning commission , asking its Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to explain how was the percentage of people living bel
...http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/supreme-court-wants-explaination-from-planning-commission-about-bpl-percentage/articleshow/8036039.cms
Maoists deny anti-India activities, raise counter-charges
Kathmandu: Nepal's Maoists have rejected Indian External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna's view that they are involved in anti-India attacks, and have instead raised concerns at "obstructions" to them as Maoist chief Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda met the Indian minister Friday.
The meeting Friday was probably the most crucial during Krishna's three-day visit to Nepal, with the minister raising the issue of Maoist attacks on Indian Ambassador Rakesh Sood as well as on Indian investments in Nepal.
After the nearly one-hour-long talks at Kathmandu's celebrated heritage hotel Dwarika's, Prachanda told the media that his party - the largest in Nepal - was keen to consolidate ties with India based on a new foundation.
Replying to Indian concerns that his party was opposing Indian joint ventures in Nepal and attacking the Indian envoy, Prachanda said the Maoists too had growing concerns of their own.
During the nearly two years of his government, he said the repeated clashes he faced with the then chief of the army, General Rookmangud Katawal - who persistently refused to allow the Maoist fighters into the army despite a peace agreement - raised fears that there were attempts to obstruct the Maoist government.
"Even during the prime ministerial election, we felt attempts were being made to obstruct (the Maoists from coming back to power)," he said.
Prachanda was referring to the unprecedented 17 rounds of election Nepal underwent to elect a new prime minister after his successor Madhav Kumar Nepal resigned in June 2010.
Prachanda's chances of winning the tri-cornered election were nixed after a mysterious audio tape surfaced, recording a phone conversation between the Maoist party's foreign affairs in-charge - and current information and communications minister - Krishna Bahadur Mahara and an unidentified middleman. Mahara was recorded as asking for money from a businessman "well-wisher" in China to buy MPs' votes for Prachanda during the prime ministerial poll.
The Maoists allege India's external intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing engineered the tape after tapping Mahara's phone.
Though, Krishna reiterated New Delhi's position that it has not interfered in Nepal's internal matters, both the Indian and Maoist denials have rung hollow at times.
Despite the documented attacks on Indian ventures in Nepal, Prachanda said his party was not anti-India. However, he said attempts were being made to weaken his party.
The Maoists say India should realise they became Nepal's largest party after the elections in 2008, winning the people's trust. India should, therefore, not try to control them like it did the other parties but treat them as equals.
Indian diplomats, however, point out that while accusing India of interference, Prachanda himself urged New Delhi to send an envoy when his party became embroiled in a battle with the army chief.
New Delhi, however, declined to do so. Krishna also asked about the Maoist stand on the peace process and the new constitution, that has to be promulgated by May 28.
The Maoist chief, who was earlier calling for a new "People's Revolt", dramatically changed his stand this week, urging his party instead to focus on the peace process and the new constitution.
On Thursday, he said that it was possible to ready the new constitution within a week.
However, New Delhi realises that the constitution may not be ready by May 28 and is urging all the parties to put their heads together and come up with an alternative to prevent a crisis after the deadline elapses.
After the meeting with Prachanda, Krishna flew to Birgunj city on the Indo-Nepal border to lay the foundation for the integrated check post being built with Indian assistance worth nearly Rs.87 crore.
The Birgunj-Raxaul check post is the main route for Indo-Nepal trade, accounting for almost 75 percent of it.
He will also lay the foundation for PRN120, the highway that is part of the network of roads to be built in the southern terai plains, for which India has pledged assistance worth Rs.805 crore.
"These projects aim at strengthening the cross-border connectivity between India and Nepal to facilitate better people-to-people contacts and economic opportunities for the people of Nepal," Krishna said.
The fallout of Krishna's visit will be manifest only after the Maoist central committee winds up its meeting, called Friday.
If the central committee endorses Prachanda's call for peace and the constitution, India can look forward to better ties with the former guerrillas.
However, Prachanda's position is likely to be challenged by his hawkish deputy Mohan Baidya, who is advocating revolt and resuming hostilities against India.
Source: IANS
Bhushans to stay, Hegde has a rethink
New Delhi/Bangalore: Unfazed by controversies surrounding the Bhushans, civil society activists today rejected demands for their resignation from the joint drafting committee on Lokpal Bill but one of its members Justice Santosh Hegde said he is thinking of resigning from it.
The demand for the resignation of lawyer Shanti Bhushan and his son Prashant grew today following a CFSL report that a CD allegedly involving the senior Bhushan was not not tampered with.
While the Bhushans kept mum, activists Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi ruled out their resignation because of the "malicious campaign" against them.
They told a press conference in Delhi that the civil society members were together and the "entire malicious" campaign launched by some "corrupt elements in and out of government" was aimed at derailing the drafting of a strong Lokpal Bill.
"There is no question of anybody resigning from the joint committee. No one will resign. We are at a historic juncture where we are going to have a strong anti-corruption law. We are not the ones who run away from battle zones."
However, upset over the "vilification campaign", justice Hegde, who is also Lokayukta in Karnataka, said in Bangalore that he was thinking of resigning, but would consult his colleagues in the anti-corruption movement in Delhi on Saturday and take a decision.
He was angry that Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh had attacked him, alleging that he was protecting the Karnataka chief minister from corruption charges.
"This is absolutely false. This is contrary to facts. I am not not a politician. I cannot fight this type of battle," he said, adding the former Madhya Pradesh chief minister's remarks were "hurting" at a time when his party leader Sonia Gandhi had made it clear she does not not support any smear campaign.
"No one has fought the Karnataka chief minister as I had done, not even the Congress in the state. People here know it," he said.
Hegde said he would discuss with his colleagues in the civil society movement, including Anna Hazare, and take a decision whether to continue in the joint drafting committee.
Acting on a complaint, the Delhi police had referred to the Central Forensic Laboratory (CFSL), a CD purported to have conversations between Shanti Bhushan, Mulayam Singh Yadav and Amar Singh, in which a suggestion is being made about fixing a judge.
The CFSL has found that the CD was not not doctored as "the recorded conversation is in continuity and no abrupt change in speech signal detected".
This contradicted a report obtained by Prashant Bhushan from a private lab in Hyderabad that the CD was tampered with.
None of us are going to resign: Arvind Kejriwal
New Delhi: As corruption allegations swirled around Lokpal Bill drafting panel members Shanti Bhushan and his son Prashant, social activists Thursday came out in strong support of the duo and said that none of the civil society members on the joint committee would resign.
"No one is going to resign," Arvind Kejriwal, a member of the drafting panel, told reporters in the national capital.
"Rumours are doing the rounds that some people are quitting from the panel, and that we are looking for substitutes, (but) no one is going to resign," he stated at a press conference.
He was referring to allegations against joint committee co-chair Shanti Bhushan, a former law minister, and his lawyer son, Prashant Bhushan, of wrongdoing in land deals, which they have vigorously denied.
"We believe the Bhushans are innocent. From our side we are in favour of a non-partisan investigation," Kejriwal said adding that the activists have filed a petition in the Supreme Court for a fair probe.
"We have filed a petition in the Supreme Court, we want a non-partisan probe under the monitoring of the Supreme Court," he said.
The Bhushans have also figured in a controversial audio CD which has purported conversations between Shanti Bhushan, Samajwadi Party leader Mulayam Singh and expelled SP member Amar Singh trying to fix a dubious legal deal.
On the alleged report of a state forensic lab certifying the CD as authentic, Kejriwal said that there were "vested interests" carrying out a "malicious campaign" against the Bhushans.
He also pointed out at the possibility of involvement of some 'government elements' in the 'malicious campaign' to derail the process of formulating a strong anti-corruption bill.
"There are vested interests which may include government elements as well. The Central Forensic Science Laboratory report was expected, had it said the CD is fake we would have been surprised," Kejriwal said adding that their information of the forensic report was based on media reports.
He also pointed out that Truth Labs in Hyderabad and an independent US audio forensic expert George Papcun had found the CD to be spliced together from earlier conversations.
Former IPS officer and a member of the civil activists group India Against Corruption, Kiran Bedi meanwhile 'appealed' to the Bhushans not to quit the panel.
"We are appealing to the Bhushans whatever they are suffering, bear with it as it is for national interest," Bedi said.
Kejriwal added that withdrawal of any member at this point of time will mean derailment of the process of forming a strong anti-corruption law.
"If any of the members quit, who will benefit? The events are at a historic turning point, where the country could get a very stringent anti-graft law," he added.
The joint panel, including five ministers, was formed following the fast unto death by crusader Anna Hazare to demand a stringent anti-corruption law.
I will answer Bhushan's notice in court: Digvijay
Bhushans' CD not tampered: Delhi police
Hegde rethinks decision to be on Lokpal panel
Source: PTI & IANS
Lokpal panel: Hegde to announce decision tomorrow
Bangalore: Amid mounting pressure from the civil society asking him not to quit the joint drafting committee on Lokpal Bill, Karnataka Lokayukta Santosh Hegde on Friday said he would announce his decision on the issue on Saturday.
"I will announce my decision tomorrow," Hegde said, a day after he threatened to quit the panel upset over the "continuous and day-to-day vilification" campaign against civil society activists who are members of the committee.
Hegde, who will be leaving for Delhi on Saturday, said, "I will discuss the issue with my colleagues and then announce my decision in the evening."
Asked about AICC general secretary Digvijay Singh reportedly saying sorry for his remarks against him if it had hurt him, Hegde refused to react, saying he was yet to read it.
On the demand for him to continue on the panel, Hedge said, "Yes, I know there is demand for me to continue. My phone has been ringing since early morning and I have had so many people coming over to request the same. But I will speak after my interaction with my colleagues in Delhi," he said.
Meanwhile, members of the civil society on Friday came out in support of Hegde continuing on the panel. The supporters holding placards urged the Lokayukta not to quit. They said his presence was vital as he was aware about the legal procedure and nitty-gritty of combating corruption.
Janata Dal (Secular) leader H.D. Kumaraswamy also urged him not to quit in "national interest".
Voices of dissonance against Anna and Co
Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt, historian K.N. Panikkar and activist Shabnam Hashmi Friday strongly objected to the "authoritarian" attitude adopted by social reformer Anna Hazare in his fight against corruption and accused him of being affiliated to right-wing Hindu groups.
The trio expressed their reservations over the formation of the joint committee for drafting the anti-graft Lokpal Bill and the way Hazare "dictated" his conditions to formulate the panel's terms and references.
They claimed the Lokpal Bill was inherently flawed because the ombudsman that the proposed legislation seeks to create was like creating "a permanent state of emergency in the country".
"It (the bill) goes... militates against democracy. A legislation may be necessary to prevent corruption in the country but the Lokpal Bill cannot do that," Panikkar, a renowned historian, told reporters.
"The Lokpal is likely to function in a social vacuum as a super judicial authority, undermining and subversive of the judicial system. It is an escapist institute. It also provides the state a safety wall to get out of the crisis," he said.
He said the anti-corruption campaign launched by Hazare has been hijacked by right-wing Hindu activists.
"RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) activists have been participating in the movement. And the attitude of Anna has been one of justifying the past history of Hindu communal forces," Panikkar said, referring to Hazare lauding of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi's developmental efforts.
He alleged that Modi has in the past targetted the Muslim minority of Gujarat. "Development is comprehensive and you cannot have a section kept away from the process."
Mahesh Bhatt too objected to some people comparing Hazare with Mahatma Gandhi and Jaya Prakash Narayan. "You cannot claim to be fighting against corruption but neglect communalism. Being apolitical, Anna could praise Modi for development, but ignored his moral problem."
He likened the whole drama of Hazare's fast-unto-death anti-graft protest and the government capitulating so swiftly, to the climax of a Hindi movie or an Indian television soap.
"This will raise TV TRPs but won't solve the problem."
Shabnam Hashmi, who had earlier also objected to Hazare's praise for Modi, alleged that the literature distributed near Jantar Mantar where the social reformer was on fast was anti-minority.
"One wonders if this (campaign) has been launched with an ulterior motive. Suddenly the talk of the Sangh terror network has disappeared."
In a joint press statement issued later, they noted that there was nothing that the Lokpal would bring to bear in the form of greater sense of transparency and accountability in the system "than what the existing institutions have achieved or not achieved".
"For that, a necessary condition is the creation of a social consciousness which would decisively disapprove and reject the culture of favouritism and nepotism."
Source: PTI & IANS
Best Bakery witness says she was forced to lie in the court
Mumbai: As the appeals filed by the nine convicts in the 2002 Best Bakery case are pending before the Bombay High Court, a key prosecution witness, Shaikh Yasmeen Banu, has claimed that she was "lured and misguided" by social activist Teesta Setalvad into giving a false testimony.
"Teesta Setalvad made me give false testimony in the Best Bakery case by luring and misguiding me. I had written everything in the affidavit submitted to the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court in June last year," Yasmeen said in a statement issued earlier this week.
Reacting to the allegation, Setalvad said, "The trial is long over. The guilty have been brought to book. I do not know why this statement has been made now. Her (Yasmeen) statement is manipulative."
Yasmeen was the only prosecution witness from the Shaikh family who stood by the police's case against the 17 accused.
Rest of the family, including prime witness and Yasmeen's sister-in-law Zaheera Shaikh, had turned hostile, alleging that they were forced by Setalvad to lie.
In her affidavit dated June 17, 2010, Yasmeen has stated that her deposition before the trial court was made at the behest of Setalvad.
According to Yasmeen, one Rais Khan, who is a close associate of Setalvad, had met her along with local Muslim leaders claiming that her life was in danger in Gujarat and she should shift to Mumbai where she would be taken care of.
"Setalvad and Rais promised to help me. I am leading a poor and miserable life. My affidavit should be treated as a petition. I don't want to say anything more," Yasmeen's statement reads.
Apart from the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, Yasmeen's affidavit has also been sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission and Director General of Police, Gujarat.
In February 2006, the sessions court here sentenced nine accused to life imprisonment. The court later tried and convicted Zaheera and others who had turned hostile for perjury.
Fourteen people who had taken refuge in the Best Bakery -- owned by the Shaikh family -- in Vadodara were killed on March 1, 2002, during the post-Godhra riots.
All the convicts have filed appeals in the Bombay High Court, which are yet to come up for hearing.
Source: PTI
Mr Pawar, learn from Narendra Modi
Agriculture Minister Pawar has to learn a few lessons from Gujarat's silent Green Revolution
New Delhi: Even as the Planning Commission says that India's desire to hit double-digit economic growth is being constrained, among other things, by the inability of the farm sector to grow at an annual average rate of 4 per cent a year, largely semi-arid Gujarat, with poor agro-ecological endowments, has reported an average growth rate of close to 9 per cent per annum over the past decade.
Gujarat's agricultural performance this past decade has turned out to be as impressive as its performance on the industrial front. What are the secrets of Chief Minister Narendra Modi's "Gujarat model of farm development"?
The twin mantras that seem to have spurred agricultural growth in this drought-prone state are improved diffusion of technology and better utilisation of water, both achieved through extensive and concerted extension services and the pooling of individual, community and official initiatives. These seem to have been followed by essential support services that provide inputs, credit, power and marketing facilities.
Other states, like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar and Assam, have also performed fairly well on the farm front, but they have along way to go before they can match Gujarat.
The original Green Revolution states in the north-west, on the other hand, have begun to lag behind on agricultural growth owing to laxity in developmental efforts and inadequate attention being paid to the over-exploitation of natural resources, including groundwater.
West Bengal, which had a record of good performance in agricultural development, has slipped and is among the poorly performing states, with agricultural growth going down from over 5 per cent in the early 1990s to under 2 per cent in recent years.
The new and innovative approach that Gujarat adopted to rejuvenate its virtually defunct farm extension system involves bringing farm scientists and service providers on the same platform and taking them to the farmer's doorstep, rather than the other way round.
For this, Krishi Raths (mobile agricultural units), carrying experts and service providers, traverse the state during month-long Krishi Mahotsavas (farm fairs) organised every year to take care of all needs of the farmers.
Soil health checks are carried out to counsel farmers on the right kind of crop to grow and the precise amount of inputs to use to optimise farm production with minimum cost. Given the scarcity of water in Gujarat, several unconventional initiatives have been taken to ensure its judicious and sustainable use.
Stress on water conservation, through rainwater harvesting, and on expanding area under irrigation, to enhance crop productivity, has helped. Apart from digging ponds on individual farms, bori-bandhs (sandbag dams) and concrete check dams are being constructed at appropriate sites in watersheds to hold water in the natural depressions so that part of it percolates down to recharge the groundwater aquifer and the rest could be used for irrigation.
And most importantly, dedicated feeder lines have been put up for assured power supply to the farm sector at fixed hours under the Jyotigram scheme. This has encouraged farmers to reduce wasteful use of pump sets and excessive use of groundwater.
Consequently, Gujarat's farmers seem to be making better use of scarce water. Clearly, there is much that farmers from the rest of India can learn to improve productivity, output and incomes.
If India follows Gujarat, 10 per cent growth should be possible!
Source: Business Standard
Dada or Didi? A new Act in the Great Bengal Drama
After thirty four years in power in West Bengal, the Left is at the crossroads. Criticised by the opposition as well as the people, it finds itself facing the stigma of being voted out of office. Is this good news for Bengal? Or is the TMC uprising just a flash in the pan? The Left remains confident of victory.
Paras Gambir is a blanket trader who operates out of Kolkata's busy Burra Bazaar. But in the past month he hasn't sold one blanket.
"On a daily basis we have been selling an average of 2,000 umbrellas, t-shirts, caps, vests, hair clips, badges and saris," he says.
All of them emblazoned with the symbols and faces of political parties and their leaders. Some of the fast movers: 'Congress sari' bearing the face of party chief Sonia Gandhi and the 'Trinamool sari' containing the twin-flowers logo. Ask which party's items have the greatest demand, and everyone points at the umbrellas with the twin flowers of the Trinamool Congress printed on them.
And this is the drama that is unfolding in West Bengal today, a drama that been 34 years in the making.
The people of Bengal are currently faced with a strange predicament: Electing the lesser of two evils. The Left Front holds the upper hand (if you may) of knowing what it is to be in power, but the Trinamool Congress dismisses their chances, calling the combine a one-man army.
When the Left Front assumed the reins of government in 1977, it was Jyoti Basu, the talismanic Communist leader, who took up the mantle of Chief Minister. Buddhadeb Bhattacharya succeeded Basu to the chair in 2000, and that's the way it has remained thus far. With Basu's death in 2010, West Bengal now has only one person who has had any experience of being Chief Minister.
One-man army or not, what the Left has done for Bengal cannot be ignored.
The first major achievement relates to agriculture. This may seem surprising because of the recent controversies surrounding the land question, one that Mamata Banerjee has so often raised, alluded to, driven at. There is a tendency to portray the state government as being insensitive. However, nothing could be further from what the reality is.
Land use and rural property have been the cornerstone of policies and discussion in West Bengal ever since the Left Front government came to power in 1977. And in these 34 years, land reform and acquisition have been the greatest economy issue. In fact, this is the biggest point of difference between the Left-led governments across the country and other state governments in India: The Left has confronted the agriculture question directly.
West Bengal has less than 4 per cent of the country's cultivated area, but accounts for 23 per cent of the total land distributed in the country since 1947, and has 55 per cent of the total number of those who have benefitted from of land distribution programmes in the entire country.
The figures are available at any government database, but what is not so well known is the fact that Bengal is one of the very few states where agricultural land is still distributed to the landless.
Over the past few years, all the publicity has been given to the few attempts at land acquisition for industry, but the amount of land involved is a fraction of the amounts distributed among the people. In fact, land distributed under the reform process is much larger, more than double the amount of land acquired for all purposes, including industry. Between 2005 and 2008, when the Bengal government was being accused of taking away land from farmers to fuel industrialisation, 30,000 acres was distributed to the landless. In 2007-08, when the rest of the state and, indeed, the country, was agog over the Nandigram agitation, what no one thought important enough to report was the fact that the same 'anti-farmer' government distributed 11,000 acres to more than 25,000 peasants.
This focus on land distribution is laudable: It singles out West Bengal from other states of the country, where there are no active programmes of land distribution. Land distribution remains the most important element to prevent landlords from ruling the roost, as well as the advent of the regressive social tendencies that are so prominent in other parts of rural India. If West Bengal does not wish to undo decades of good work, the Left must remain in power.
The second important achievement of the Left government is about the improvements in health indicators. While the focus has only just shifted to health, the pace of progress has been commendable. Data from the Registrar-General of India shows that West Bengal is now one of the best-performing states in the country in terms of the most basic health indicators.
The crude birth rate (live births per 1,000 people in a year) in Bengal declined by 28 per cent, from 22.4 to 17.5, between 1997 and 2009 (India, as a whole, saw a decline of 19 per cent). The death rate in Bengal fell by 25 per cent over the same period, as compared to 20 per cent for India as a whole.
However, while these achievements paint the Left Front in good light, the grey areas remain.
Left Front chairman Biman Bose is confident that the combine will return to power in the April-May assembly polls. But he stresses that the Left has made mistakes in the past few years, going to the extent of asking his cadres to apologise to the people. He says the apologies have helped.
The fact that this year's Assembly polls comes on the backdrop of the drubbing handed to the Left in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections is not forgotten.
The Left Front got 10 lakh votes less than the opposition in the 2009 because of "improper activities of Left activists" says Bose.
"By mid-2010 we started revamping our party organisation and adopted the campaign. We asked our party workers to admit and regret their mistakes and ask for apology from the people. Now the political situation has changed a lot," says Bose.
Most political observers agree that the Front faces the stiffest test of its 34-year rule in the coming elections from the Trinamool-Congress combine. But Bose says the Left would overcome any anti-incumbency factor.
"The opposition campaign is based totally on falsehood and manufactured stories. [Moreover] the way the zilla parishads and municipalities are being run by TMC, it is making people realise how this 'lot' of bad managers will run the state," said Bose.
Perhaps, the strongest word of confidence comes from the man who has seen it all in Bengal.
"I will set up a factory at Singur after the formation of the 8th Left Front government, this will be the largest factory in the state" says Buddhadeb Bhattacharya.
"Let me see if they (Trinamool) have the courage to resist it."
Paras Gambir's TMC umbrellas may be flying off the shelves, but the mood in the Red bastion is upbeat.
Will May 13 be a Red-letter day, or will Bengal see the rise of Two-flower power? The stage is set, Act II is about to begin.
Source: India Syndicate/Agencies
Black money: Were agencies sleeping all these years: SC
New Delhi: "Were government sleeping all these years on the issue of blackmoney," was how the Supreme Court today said while criticising Centre's probe restricting to an individual and being evasive about the idea of an investigation by the Special Investigating Team.
The apex court said the investigation into the issue of black money required "complete" and "full-fledged" involvement of government as the most important question was about the disclosure of source of money stashed in foreign banks which may be terror money or money coming from drug peddling.
A bench of justices B Sudershan Reddy and S S Nijjar asked the governemnt to explain why its investigation is focused only on Pune stud farm owner Hassan Ali Khan and no other name has come out who have stashed money in overseas banks.
"Your whole focus is centred on one individual. Does it mean that all the black money parked in foreign banks belong to only one person? Is it that black money issue is surrounding around one person? Do you have information beyond that?" the bench said.
"We put it very simply and bluntly. Do you have any information regarding other persons also? It seems there is only one person (Indian) who has bank account in Switzerland and no other persons'' account has come under suspect in Swiss bank," the bench told the governemnt.
Responding to the specific question put by the bench, Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium said the matter has to be investigated on different fronts and the court should ask the RBI to file a report on black money stashed in UBS Bank, Switzerland, on the basis of which further action could be taken.
He said the issue of passport case should be investigated by CBI as the offence in this regard was not restricted only to Maharashtra but to other states and earlier also it was stated that "it is not an offence simplicitor".
Not impressed by the arguments of the government, the bench said "do you want to say that all government agencies were sleeping till now on this issue? Now you are saying that different aspects of the case have to be handled by different agencies."
"Is it your case that there is no suspect account in foreign banks other than this man? Since you have been working on the case at least since 2009, we did not say investigation has be a person specific. What is your information"?, the bench said adding "the source of money has to be found whether it was terror money or money coming from drug peddling".
It further said the fresh status report filed by the ED has reflected more and speaks about a group company having money stashed in a foreign bank.
"During the course of investigation, something else has come which is there in the status report about Rs 600 crore. What is the source of Rs 600 crore? What is the problem? It belongs to a group of company," the bench said.
The government also opposed the idea of setting up a SIT comprising members of various agencies to probe the case saying the ED has been conducting the investigation properly, which is reflected in the status report filed before the bench.
The court, however, said that in view of the gravity of the case more than one agency is required to conduct the investigation as the ED itself had expressed "helplessness" on numerious occasion while probing the case.
"We are very clear in our mind that more than one agency is required to conduct the investigation and it should be monitored by a person of eminence which could be a retired Chief Justice of High Court," the court said.
"There is nothing wrong in more than one agency and no one's jurisdiction would be taken away. In fact, the ED has itself shown helplessness many times in the case," the court said adding "we do not say the ED would not be part of the team. The case is very serious and we are of the opinion that more than one agency is required to conduct probe in it."
The bench was not impressed with the idea of the Solicitor General for segregation of the probe by different agencies like CBI, ED and RBI.
"Instead of segregation, we propose the constitution of SIT. For the purpose of effective investigation, SIT can be notified," the bench said.
Senior advocate Anil Divan, appearing for the petitioners, said the government did not want SIT and lose control over the probe.
The court asked Subramanium to take instructions from the governemnt on the issue of setting up of SIT and posted the case for further hearing on April 25.
The court was hearing a petition filed by noted lawyer Ram Jethmalani and some former bureaucrats seeking the court's direction to the government to bring black money stashed by Indian nationals in foreign banks, which is said to be to the tune of one trillion US dollars.
Besides Jethmalani, five others, including former Punjab DGP K P S Gill and former Secretary General of Lok Sabha Subhash Kashyap who are petitioners, have alleged the government was not taking action to bring the back black money stashed in foreign banks.
NGO People's Political Front and former top cop Julio F Riberio are also among the petitioners. Earlier, the court had expressed displeasure over the government's reluctance to come forward with full information on the black money stashed by Indians in foreign banks, saying keeping national wealth abroad amounted to "plunder" of the country.
The court had also asked the government to track the source of the blackmoney which might have originated from arms deals, drug trafficking and smuggling.
Source: PTI
Mumbai v Chennai, IPL 2011, Mumbai
Chennai fall to Harbhajan five-for
Live scorecard | Bulletin | Preview | Review - A WAG and an out-of-place maiden | IPL winning popularity contest? |TV ratings fail to build on start | Highs and lows
Kolkata v Bangalore, IPL 2011, Eden Gardens
Gayle arrives with blistering century
Scorecard | Bulletin - Kolkata floored | Plays - Wide, wider and widest | Gallery | Graph - The perfect chase
Sri Lanka news
Bowler suffering from degenerative knee condition | SLC wants Malinga back from IPL
Specials
What sort of coach do India need?
Harsha Bhogle: An ideal candidate would be a man like Gary Kirsten: a hardworking, unassuming, flexible former Test player
Mumbai best among equals ... so far
Numbers Game: They've lost only a third of the wickets their bowlers have taken, which reflects their dominance
IPL winning the popularity contest?
ESPNcricinfo Weekly: Despite the criticism, in its fourth year the IPL is proving its appeal to the modern fan
Fake Malinga, fake Shastri, and the shoes from hell
Highs and Lows: A look back at the first two weeks of the IPL | Cartoon | Pretty lame headlines | Page 2 home
The Surfer
On This Day
'You need good cricketers to be a good coach'
John Wright on the place of coaching in the modern game, and his stints with New Zealand and India. By Sharda Ugra
Youth shines, but where's the experience?
Countyscape: Do fluctuating standards and performances suggest an underlying weakness in the competition?
Switch Hit: ICC may change the number of teams at the 2015 World Cup. We get Netherlands CEO Richard Cox's view
Blogs
Rob on the Road: Robbie Frylinck at the IPL
There is cricket and then there is cricket
Inbox: Do away with redundant bilateral ODI series
The journey from emerging to elite
Inbox: The road has been a difficult one for several nations
-
Notable absentees in opening ODI
Preview | Sammy urges team unity -
Bishoo four leads West Indies win
Scorecard | Bulletin - Simmons makes 65 | 'My self-confidence helped me' - Bishoo | Gallery -
Will green Delhi effect turnaround?
Delhi v Punjab preview -
SL players will play IPL till May 18
Players to be added for first tour game in England | Chandimal in squad for Tests | National team bigger than IPL - Dilshan -
Marsh shines in big Punjab win
Scorecard | Bulletin - Rajasthan disappoint | Gallery | Plays - The no-balls and the maiden | Marsh praises 'team spirit' | Warne rues 'horror batting start' -
'I had no other choice' - Gayle
Batsman says WICB did not communicate with him | Board 'disappointed' with Gayle joining IPL -
The Buzz: Heyhoe-Flint receives freedom of Wolves In Focus: Axeing the Associates
Economy of India
Economy of The Republic of India | |
---|---|
Modern Indian currency notes | |
Rank | 10th (nominal) / 4th (PPP) |
Currency | 1 Indian Rupee (INR) () = 100 Paise |
Fiscal year | Calendar year (1 April – 31 March) |
Trade organizations | WTO, SAFTA, G-20 and others |
Statistics | |
GDP | $1.53 trillion (nominal: 10th; 2010)[1] |
GDP growth | 8.2% (2010, Q3)[2] |
GDP per capita | $1,265 (nominal: 138th; 2010)[1] |
GDP by sector | services (55.3%), industry (28.6%), agriculture (16.1%) (2010) |
Inflation (CPI) | 8.31% (February 2011)[3] |
Population below poverty line | 37% (2010)[4] |
Gini index | 36.8 (List of countries) |
Labour force | 478 million (2nd; 2009) |
Labour force by occupation | agriculture (52%), industry (14%), services (34%) (2009 est.) |
Unemployment | 9.4% (2009–10)[5] |
Main industries | telecommunications, textiles, chemicals, food processing, steel, transportation equipment, cement, mining, petroleum, machinery, information technology, pharmaceuticals |
Ease of Doing Business Rank | 134th[6] (2011) |
External | |
Exports | $201 billion (20th; 2010) |
Export goods | petroleum products, precious stones, machinery, iron and steel, chemicals, vehicles, apparel |
Main export partners | UAE 12.87%, US 12.59%, China 5.59% (2009) |
Imports | $327 billion (11th; 2010) |
Import goods | crude oil, precious stones, machinery, fertilizer, iron and steel, chemicals |
Main import partners | China 10.94%, US 7.16%, Saudi Arabia 5.36%, UAE 5.18%, Australia 5.02%, Germany 4.86%, Singapore 4.02% (2009) |
FDI stock | $35.6 billion (2009-10) |
Gross external debt | $237.1 billion (2010 est.) |
Public finances | |
Public debt | $758 billion (2010)[7] 55.9% of GDP |
Budget deficit | 5.1% of GDP (2010-11) |
Revenues | $170.7 billion (2010 est.) |
Expenses | $257.4 billion (2010 est.) |
Economic aid | $2.107 billion (2008)[8] |
Credit rating | $1.164 trillion (2010 est.) |
Foreign reserves | $308 billion (7th; April 2011) |
Main data source: CIA World Fact Book All values, unless otherwise stated, are in US dollars |
- "Dollar" and "$" refer throughout to the US dollar.
The Economy of India is the tenth largest in the world by nominal GDP[1] and the fourth largest by purchasing power parity (PPP).[1] The country's per capita GDP (PPP) is$3,339 (IMF, 129th) in 2010.[1] Following strong economic reforms from the post-independence socialist economy, the country's economic growth progressed at a rapid pace, as free market principles were initiated in 1991 for international competition and foreign investment.[9]
Contents[hide] |
[edit]Overview
Social democratic policies governed India's economy from 1947 to 1991. The economy was characterised by extensive regulation, protectionism, public ownership, pervasive corruption and slow growth.[10][11][12] Since 1991, continuing economic liberalisation has moved the country towards a market-based economy.[10][11] A revival of economic reforms and better economic policy in first decade of the 21st century accelerated India'seconomic growth rate. In recent years, Indian cities have continued to liberalise business regulations.[6] By 2008, India had established itself as the world's second-fastest growing major economy.[13]
However, as a result of the financial crisis of 2007–2010, coupled with a poor monsoon, India's gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate significantly slowed to 6.7% in 2008–09, but subsequently recovered to 7.2% in 2009–10, while the fiscal deficit rose from 5.9% to a high 6.5% during the same period.[14] India's current account deficit surged to 4.1% of GDP during Q2 FY11 against 3.2% the previous quarter. The unemployment rate for 2009–2010, according to the state Labour Bureau, was 9.4% nationwide, rising to 10.1% in rural areas, where two-thirds of the 1.2 billion population live.[5]
India's large service industry accounts for 57.2% of the country's GDP while the industrial and agricultural sectors contribute 28.6% and 14.6% respectively.[15]Agriculture is the predominant occupation in India, accounting for about 52% of employment. The service sector makes up a further 34%, and industrial sector around 14%.[16] However, statistics from a 2009-10 government survey, which used a smallersample size than earlier surveys, suggested that the share of agriculture in employment had dropped to 45.5%.[5]
Major industries include telecommunications, textiles, chemicals, food processing, steel, transportation equipment, cement, mining, petroleum, machinery, information technology-enabled services and pharmaceuticals.[17] The labour force totals 500 million workers. Major agricultural products include rice, wheat, oilseed, cotton, jute, tea, sugarcane, potatoes, cattle, water buffalo, sheep, goats, poultry and fish.[17] In 2009-2010, India's top five trading partners are United Arab Emirates, China, United States, Saudi Arabia and Germany.
Previously a closed economy, India's trade and business sector has grown fast.[10] India currently accounts for 1.5% of world trade as of 2007 according to the World Trade Statistics of the WTO in 2006, which valued India's total merchandise trade (counting exports and imports) at $294 billion and India's services trade at $143 billion. Thus, India's global economic engagement in 2006 covering both merchandise and services trade was of the order of $437 billion, up by a record 72% from a level of $253 billion in 2004. India's total trade in goods and services has reached a share of 43% of GDP in 2005–06, up from 16% in 1990–91.[18]
[edit]History
[edit]Pre-colonial period (up to 1773)
The citizens of the Indus Valley civilisation, a permanent settlement that flourished between 2800 BC and 1800 BC, practiced agriculture, domesticated animals, used uniform weights and measures, made tools and weapons, and traded with other cities. Evidence of well-planned streets, a drainage system and water supply reveals their knowledge of urban planning, which included the world's first urban sanitation systems and the existence of a form of municipal government.[20]
Maritime trade was carried out extensively between South India and southeast and West Asiafrom early times until around the fourteenth century AD. Both the Malabar and Coromandel Coastswere the sites of important trading centres from as early as the first century BC, used for import and export as well as transit points between the Mediterranean region and southeast Asia.[21] Over time, traders organised themselves into associations which received state patronage. However, state patronage for overseas trade came to an end by the thirteenth century AD, when it was largely taken over by the local Jewish and Muslim communities, initially on the Malabar and subsequently on the Coromandel coast.[22] Further north, the Saurashtra and Bengal coasts played an important role in maritime trade, and the Gangetic plains and the Indus valley housed several centres of river-borne commerce. Most overland trade was carried out via the Khyber Pass connecting the Punjab region with Afghanistan and onward to the Middle East and Central Asia.[23] Although many kingdoms and rulers issued coins, barter was prevalent. Villages paid a portion of their agricultural produce as revenue to the rulers, while their craftsmen received a part of the crops at harvest time for their services.[24]
Religion, especially Hinduism and the caste and the joint family systems, played an influential role in shaping economic activities.[25] The caste system functioned much like medieval Europeanguilds, ensuring the division of labour, providing for the training of apprentices and, in some cases, allowing manufacturers to achieve narrow specialisation. For instance, in certain regions, producing each variety of cloth was the specialty of a particular sub-caste. Textiles such asmuslin, Calicos, shawls, and agricultural products such as pepper, cinnamon, opium and indigowere exported to Europe, the Middle East and South East Asia in return for gold and silver.[26]
Assessment of India's pre-colonial economy is mostly qualitative, owing to the lack of quantitative information. The Mughal economy functioned on an elaborate system of coined currency, land revenue and trade. Gold, silver and copper coins were issued by the royal mints which functioned on the basis of free coinage.[27] The political stability and uniform revenue policy resulting from a centralised administration under the Mughals, coupled with a well-developed internal trade network, ensured that India, before the arrival of the British, was to a large extent economically unified, despite having a traditional agrarian economy characterised by a predominance of subsistence agriculture dependent on primitive technology.[28] After the decline of the Mughals, western, central and parts of south and north India were integrated and administered by the Maratha Empire. After the loss at the Third Battle of Panipat, the Maratha Empire disintegrated into several confederate states, and the resulting political instability and armed conflict severely affected economic life in several parts of the country, although this was compensated for to some extent by localised prosperity in the new provincial kingdoms.[29] By the end of the eighteenth century, the British East India Company entered the Indian political theatre and established its dominance over other European powers. This marked a determinative shift in India's trade, and a less powerful impact on the rest of the economy.[30]
[edit]Colonial period (1773–1947)
There is no doubt that our grievances against the British Empire had a sound basis. As the painstaking statistical work of the Cambridge historian Angus Maddison has shown, India's share of world income collapsed from 22.6% in 1700, almost equal to Europe's share of 23.3% at that time, to as low as 3.8% in 1952. Indeed, at the beginning of the 20th Century, "the brightest jewel in the British Crown" was the poorest country in the world in terms of per capita income.
Company rule in India brought a major change in the taxation and agricultural policies, which tended to promote commercialisation of agriculture with a focus on trade, resulting in decreased production of food crops, mass impoverishment and destitution of farmers, and in the short term, led to numerous famines.[32] The economic policies of the British Raj caused a severe decline in the handicrafts and handloom sectors, due to reduced demand and dipping employment.[33] After the removal of international restrictions by the Charter of 1813, Indian trade expanded substantially and over the long term showed an upward trend.[34] The result was a significant transfer of capital from India to England, which, due to the colonial policies of the British, led to a massive drain of revenue rather than any systematic effort at modernisation of the domestic economy.[35]
India's colonisation by the British created an institutional environment that, on paper, guaranteedproperty rights among the colonisers, encouraged free trade, and created a single currency withfixed exchange rates, standardised weights and measures and capital markets. It also established a well-developed system of railways and telegraphs, a civil service that aimed to be free from political interference, a common-law and an adversarial legal system.[37] This coincided with major changes in the world economy – industrialisation, and significant growth in production and trade. However, at the end of colonial rule, India inherited an economy that was one of the poorest in the developing world,[38] with industrial development stalled, agriculture unable to feed a rapidly growing population, a largely illiterate and unskilled labour force, and extremely inadequate infrastructure.[39]
The 1872 census revealed that 91.3% of the population of the region constituting present-day India resided in villages,[40] and urbanisation generally remained sluggish until the 1920s, due to the lack of industrialisation and absence of adequate transportation. Subsequently, the policy of discriminating protection (where certain important industries were given financial protection by the state), coupled with the Second World War, saw the development and dispersal of industries, encouraging rural-urban migration, and in particular the large port cities ofBombay, Calcutta and Madras grew rapidly. Despite this, only one-sixth of India's population lived in cities by 1951.[41]
The impact of the British rule on India's economy is a controversial topic. Leaders of the Indian independence movement and left-nationalisteconomic historians have blamed colonial rule for the dismal state of India's economy in its aftermath and argued that financial strength required for industrial development in Europe was derived from the wealth taken from colonies in Asia and Africa. At the same time, right-wing historians have countered that India's low economic performance was due to various sectors being in a state of growth and decline due to changes brought in by colonialism and a world that was moving towards industrialisation and economic integration.[42]
[edit]Pre-liberalisation period (1947–1991)
Indian economic policy after independence was influenced by the colonial experience, which was seen by Indian leaders as exploitative, and by those leaders' exposure to democratic socialism as well as the progress achieved by the economy of the Soviet Union.[39] Domestic policy tended towards protectionism, with a strong emphasis on import substitution industrialisation, economic interventionism, a large public sector, business regulation, and central planning,[43] while trade and foreign investment policies were relatively liberal.[44] Five-Year Plans of India resembled central planning in the Soviet Union. Steel, mining, machine tools, telecommunications, insurance, and power plants, among other industries, were effectively nationalised in the mid-1950s.[45]
Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of India, along with the statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis, formulated and oversaw economic policy during the initial years of the country's existence. They expected favorable outcomes from their strategy, involving the rapid development of heavy industry by both public and private sectors, and based on direct and indirect state intervention, rather than the more extreme Soviet-style central command system.[46][47] The policy of concentrating simultaneously on capital- and technology-intensive heavy industry and subsidising manual, low-skill cottage industries was criticised by economist Milton Friedman, who thought it would waste capital and labour, and retard the development of small manufacturers.[48] The rate of growth of the Indian economy in the first three decades after independence was derisively referred to as the Hindu rate of growth, because of the unfavourable comparison with growth rates in other Asian countries, especially the East Asian Tigers.[49][50]
Since 1965, the use of high-yielding varieties of seeds, increased fertilisers and improved irrigation facilities collectively contributed to theGreen Revolution in India, which improved the condition of agriculture by increasing crop productivity, improving crop patterns and strengthening forward and backward linkages between agriculture and industry.[51] However, it has also been criticised as an unsustainable effort, resulting in the growth of capitalistic farming, ignoring institutional reforms and widening income disparities.[52]
[edit]Post-liberalisation period (since 1991)
In the late 1970s, the government led by Morarji Desai eased restrictions on capacity expansion for incumbent companies, removed price controls, reduced corporate taxes and promoted the creation of small scale industries in large numbers. However, the subsequent government policy of Fabian socialism hampered the benefits of the economy, leading to high fiscal deficits and a worsening current account. The collapse of the Soviet Union, which was India's major trading partner, and the Gulf War, which caused a spike in oil prices, resulted in a major balance-of-payments crisis for India, which found itself facing the prospect of defaulting on its loans.[53] India asked for a $1.8 billion bailout loan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which in return demanded reforms.[54]
In response, Prime Minister Narasimha Rao, along with his finance minister Manmohan Singh, initiated the economic liberalisation of 1991. The reforms did away with the Licence Raj, reduced tariffs and interest rates and ended many public monopolies, allowing automatic approval of foreign direct investment in many sectors.[55] Since then, the overall thrust of liberalisation has remained the same, although no government has tried to take on powerful lobbies such as trade unions and farmers, on contentious issues such as reforming labour laws and reducing agricultural subsidies.[56] By the turn of the 20th century, India had progressed towards a free-market economy, with a substantial reduction in state control of the economy and increased financial liberalisation.[57] This has been accompanied by increases in life expectancy, literacy rates and food security, although the beneficiaries have largely been urban residents.[58]
While the credit rating of India was hit by its nuclear weapons tests in 1998, it has since been raised to investment level in 2003 by S&P and Moody's.[59] In 2003, Goldman Sachs predicted that India's GDP in current prices would overtake France and Italy by 2020, Germany, UK and Russia by 2025 and Japan by 2035, making it the third largest economy of the world, behind the US and China. India is often seen by most economists as a rising economic superpower and is believed to play a major role in the global economy in the 21st century.[60][61]
[edit]Sectors
[edit]Industry and services
Industry accounts for 28% of the GDP and employ 14% of the total workforce.[16] In absolute terms, India is 12th in the world in terms of nominal factory output.[64] The Indian industrial sector underwent significant changes as a result of the economic reforms of 1991, which removed import restrictions, brought in foreign competition, led to privatisation of certain public sector industries, liberalised the FDI regime, improved infrastructure and led to an expansion in the production of fast moving consumer goods.[65] Post-liberalisation, the Indian private sector was faced with increasing domestic as well as foreign competition, including the threat of cheaper Chinese imports. It has since handled the change by squeezing costs, revamping management, and relying on cheap labour and new technology. However, this has also reduced employment generation even by smaller manufacturers who earlier relied on relatively labour-intensive processes.[66]
Textile manufacturing is the second largest source of employment after agriculture and accounts for 20% of manufacturing output, providing employment to over 20 million people.[67] Ludhianaproduces 90% of woollens in India and is known as the Manchester of India. Tirupur has gained universal recognition as the leading source of hosiery, knitted garments, casual wear and sportswear.[68]
India is 13th in services output. The services sector provides employment to 23% of the work force and is growing quickly, with a growth rate of 7.5% in 1991–2000, up from 4.5% in 1951–80. It has the largest share in the GDP, accounting for 55% in 2007, up from 15% in 1950.[16]Information technology and business process outsourcing are among the fastest growing sectors, having a cumulative growth rate of revenue 33.6% between 1997–98 and 2002–03 and contributing to 25% of the country's total exports in 2007–08.[69] The growth in the IT sector is attributed to increased specialisation, and an availability of a large pool of low cost, highly skilled, educated and fluent English-speaking workers, on the supply side, matched on the demand side by increased demand from foreign consumers interested in India's service exports, or those looking to outsource their operations. The share of the Indian IT industry in the country's GDP increased from 4.8 % in 2005–06 to 7% in 2008.[70] In 2009, seven Indian firms were listed among the top 15 technology outsourcing companies in the world.[71]
Mining forms an important segment of the Indian economy, with the country producing 79 different minerals (excluding fuel and atomic resources) in 2009–10, including iron ore, manganese, mica, bauxite, chromite, limestone, asbestos, fluorite, gypsum, ochre, phosphoriteand silica sand.[72] Organised retail supermarkets accounts for 24% of the market as of 2008.[73] Regulations prevent most foreign investment in retailing. Moreover, over thirty regulations such as "signboard licences" and "anti-hoarding measures" may have to be complied before a store can open doors. There are taxes for moving goods from state to state, and even within states.[73] Tourism in India is relatively undeveloped, but growing at double digits. Some hospitals woo medical tourism.[74]
[edit]Agriculture
India ranks second worldwide in farm output. Agriculture and allied sectors like forestry, loggingand fishing accounted for 15.7% of the GDP in 2009–10, employed 52.1% of the total workforce, and despite a steady decline of its share in the GDP, is still the largest economic sector and a significant piece of the overall socio-economic development of India.[77] Yields per unit area of all crops have grown since 1950, due to the special emphasis placed on agriculture in the five-year plans and steady improvements in irrigation, technology, application of modern agricultural practices and provision of agricultural credit and subsidies since the Green Revolution in India. However, international comparisons reveal the average yield in India is generally 30% to 50% of the highest average yield in the world.[78]
India receives an average annual rainfall of 1,208 millimetres (47.6 in) and a total annualprecipitation of 4000 billion cubic metres, with the total utilisable water resources, including surface and groundwater, amounting to 1123 billion cubic metres.[79] 546,820 square kilometres (211,130 sq mi) of the land area, or about 39% of the total cultivated area, is irrigated.[80] India's inland water resources including rivers, canals, ponds and lakes and marine resources comprising the east and west coasts of the Indian ocean and other gulfs and bays provide employment to nearly six million people in the fisheries sector. In 2008, India had the world's third largest fishing industry.[81]
India is the largest producer in the world of milk, jute and pulses, and also has the world's second largest cattle population with 175 million animals in 2008.[75] It is the second largest producer of rice, wheat, sugarcane, cotton and groundnuts, as well as the second largest fruit and vegetable producer, accounting for 10.9% and 8.6% of the world fruit and vegetable production respectively.[75] India is also the second largest producer and the largest consumer of silk in the world, producing 77,000 million tons in 2005.[82]
[edit]Banking and finance
The Indian money market is classified into the organised sector, comprising private, public and foreign owned commercial banks andcooperative banks, together known as scheduled banks, and the unorganised sector, which includes individual or family owned indigenous bankers or money lenders and non-banking financial companies.[83] The unorganised sector and microcredit are still preferred over traditional banks in rural and sub-urban areas, especially for non-productive purposes, like ceremonies and short duration loans.[84]
Prime Minister Indira Gandhi nationalised 14 banks in 1969, followed by six others in 1980, and made it mandatory for banks to provide 40% of their net credit to priority sectors like agriculture, small-scale industry, retail trade, small businesses, etc. to ensure that the banks fulfill their social and developmental goals. Since then, the number of bank branches has increased from 8,260 in 1969 to 72,170 in 2007 and the population covered by a branch decreased from 63,800 to 15,000 during the same period. The total bank deposits increased from 5,910 crore (US$1.31 billion) in 1970–71 to 3,830,922 crore (US$850.46 billion) in 2008–09. Despite an increase of rural branches, from 1,860 or 22% of the total number of branches in 1969 to 30,590 or 42% in 2007, only 32,270 out of 500,000 villages are covered by a scheduled bank.[85][86]
India's gross domestic saving in 2006–07 as a percentage of GDP stood at a high 32.7%.[87] More than half of personal savings are invested in physical assets such as land, houses, cattle, and gold.[88] The public sector banks hold over 75% of total assets of the banking industry, with the private and foreign banks holding 18.2% and 6.5% respectively.[89] Since liberalisation, the government has approved significant banking reforms. While some of these relate to nationalised banks, like encouraging mergers, reducing government interference and increasing profitability and competitiveness, other reforms have opened up the banking and insurance sectors to private and foreign players.[16][90]
[edit]Energy and power
India's oil reserves meet 25% of the country's domestic oil demand.[16][92] As of 2009, India's total proven oil reserves stood at 775 million metric tonnes while gas reserves stood at 1074 billion cubic metres.[93] Oil and natural gas fields are located offshore at Mumbai High, Krishna Godavari Basin and the Cauvery Delta, and onshore mainly in the states of Assam, Gujarat andRajasthan.[93] India is the fourth largest consumer of oil in the world and imported $82.1 billion worth of oil in the first three quarters of 2010, which had an adverse effect on its current account deficit.[91] The petroleum industry in India mostly consists of public sector companies such as Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) and Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL). There are some major private Indian companies in the oil sector such as Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) which operates the world's largest oil refining complex.[94]
As of 2010, India had an installed power generation capacity of 164,835 megawatts (MW), of which thermal power contributed 64.6%, hydroelectricity 24.7%, other sources of renewable energy 7.7%, and nuclear power 2.9%.[95] India meets most of its domestic energy demand through its 106 billion tonnes of coal reserves.[96] India is also rich in certain renewable sources of energy with significant future potential such as solar, wind and biofuels (jatropha, sugarcane). India's huge thorium reserves – about 25% of world's reserves – are expected to fuel the country's ambitious nuclear energy program in the long-run. India's dwindling uranium reserves stagnated the growth of nuclear energy in the country for many years.[97] However, the Indo-US nuclear deal has paved the way for India to import uranium from other countries.[98]
[edit]External trade and investment
[edit]Global trade relations
Until the liberalisation of 1991, India was largely and intentionally isolated from the world markets, to protect its economy and to achieve self-reliance. Foreign trade was subject to import tariffs, export taxes and quantitative restrictions, while foreign direct investment (FDI) was restricted by upper-limit equity participation, restrictions on technology transfer, export obligations and government approvals; these approvals were needed for nearly 60% of new FDI in the industrial sector. The restrictions ensured that FDI averaged only around $200 million annually between 1985 and 1991; a large percentage of the capital flows consisted of foreign aid, commercial borrowing and deposits of non-resident Indians.[99] India's exports were stagnant for the first 15 years after independence, due to general neglect of trade policy by the government of that period. Imports in the same period, due to industrialisation being nascent, consisted predominantly of machinery, raw materials and consumer goods.[100]
Since liberalisation, the value of India's international trade has increased sharply,[101] with the contribution of total trade in goods and services to the GDP rising from 16% in 1990–91 to 43% in 2005–06.[18] India's major trading partners are the European Union, China, the United States and the United Arab Emirates.[102] In 2006–07, major export commodities included engineering goods, petroleum products, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, gems and jewellery, textiles and garments, agricultural products, iron ore and other minerals. Major import commodities included crude oil and related products, machinery, electronic goods, gold and silver.[103] In November 2010, exports increased 22.3% year-on-year to 85,063 crore (US$18.88 billion), while imports were up 7.5% at 125,133 crore (US$27.78 billion). Trade deficit for the same month dropped from 46,865 crore (US$10.4 billion) in 2009 to 40,070 crore (US$8.9 billion) in 2010.[104]
India is a founding-member of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) since 1947 and its successor, the WTO. While participating actively in its general council meetings, India has been crucial in voicing the concerns of the developing world. For instance, India has continued its opposition to the inclusion of such matters as labour and environment issues and other non-tariff barriers to trade into the WTO policies.[105]
[edit]Balance of payments
Since independence, India's balance of payments on its current account has been negative. Since economic liberalisation in the 1990s, precipitated by a balance of payment crisis, India's exports rose consistently, covering 80.3% of its imports in 2002–03, up from 66.2% in 1990–91.[106]However, the global economic slump followed by a general deceleration in world trade saw the exports as a percentage of imports drop to 61.4% in 2008–09.[107] India's growing oil import bill is seen as the main driver behind the large current account deficit,[91] which rose to $118.7 billion, or 9.7% of GDP, in 2008–09.[108] Between January and October 2010, India imported $82.1 billion worth of crude oil.[91]
Due to the global late-2000s recession, both Indian exports and imports declined by 29.2% and 39.2% respectively in June 2009.[109] The steep decline was because countries hit hardest by the global recession, such as United States and members of the European Union, account for more than 60% of Indian exports.[110] However, since the decline in imports was much sharper compared to the decline in exports, India's trade deficit reduced to 25,250 crore (US$5.61 billion).[109]
India's reliance on external assistance and concessional debt has decreased since liberalisation of the economy, and the debt service ratiodecreased from 35.3% in 1990–91 to 4.4% in 2008–09.[111] In India, External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs), or commercial loans from non-resident lenders, are being permitted by the Government for providing an additional source of funds to Indian corporates. The Ministry of Finance monitors and regulates them through ECB policy guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India under the Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999.[112] India's foreign exchange reserves have steadily risen from $5.8 billion in March 1991 to $283.5 billion in December 2009. [113]
[edit]Foreign direct investment
Share of top five investing countries in FDI inflows. (2000–2010)[114] | |||
Rank | Country | Inflows (million USD) | Inflows (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mauritius | 50,164 | 42.00 |
2 | Singapore | 11,275 | 9.00 |
3 | USA | 8,914 | 7.00 |
4 | UK | 6,158 | 5.00 |
5 | Netherlands | 4,968 | 4.00 |
As the fourth-largest economy in the world in PPP terms, India is a preferred destination for FDI;[115] India has strengths in telecommunication, information technology and other significant areas such as auto components, chemicals, apparels, pharmaceuticals, and jewellery. Despite a surge in foreign investments, rigid FDI policies were a significant hindrance. However, due to positive economic reforms aimed at deregulating the economy and stimulating foreign investment, India has positioned itself as one of the front-runners of the rapidly growing Asia-Pacific region.[115] India has a large pool of skilled managerial and technical expertise. The size of the middle-class population stands at 300 million and represents a growing consumer market.[116]
During 2000–10, the country attracted $178 billion as FDI.[117] The inordinately high investment from Mauritius is due to routing of international funds through the country given significant tax advantages; double taxation is avoided due to a tax treaty between India and Mauritius, and Mauritius is a capital gains tax haven, effectively creating a zero-taxation FDI channel.[118]
India's recently liberalised FDI policy (2005) allows up to a 100% FDI stake in ventures. Industrial policy reforms have substantially reduced industrial licensing requirements, removed restrictions on expansion and facilitated easy access to foreign technology and foreign direct investment FDI. The upward moving growth curve of the real-estate sector owes some credit to a booming economy and liberalised FDI regime. In March 2005, the government amended the rules to allow 100% FDI in the construction sector, including built-up infrastructure and construction development projects comprising housing, commercial premises, hospitals, educational institutions, recreational facilities, and city- and regional-level infrastructure.[119] Despite a number of changes in the FDI policy to remove caps in most sectors, there still remains an unfinished agenda of permitting greater FDI in politically sensitive areas such as insurance and retailing. The total FDI equity inflow into India in 2008–09 stood at 122,919 crore (US$27.29 billion), a growth of 25% in rupee terms over the previous period.[120].
[edit]Currency
The Indian rupee is the only legal tender in India, and is also accepted as legal tender in the neighbouring Nepal and Bhutan, both of which peg their currency to that of the Indian rupee. The rupee is divided into 100 paise. The highest-denomination banknote is the 1,000 rupee note; the lowest-denomination coin in circulation is the 10 paise coin.[121] However, with effect from 30 June 2011, 50 paise will be the minimum coin accepted in the markets as all denominations below it will cease to be legal currency.[122][123] India's monetary system is managed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the country's central bank.[124] Established on 1 April 1935 and nationalised in 1949, the RBI serves as the nation's monetary authority, regulator and supervisor of the monetary system, banker to the government, custodian of foreign exchange reserves, and as an issuer of currency. It is governed by a central board of directors, headed by a governor who is appointed by the Government of India.[125]
The rupee was linked to the British pound from 1927–1946 and then the U.S. dollar till 1975 through a fixed exchange rate. It was devalued in September 1975 and the system of fixed par rate was replaced with a basket of four major international currencies – the British pound, the U.S. dollar, the Japanese yen and the Deutsche mark.[126] Since 2003, the rupee has been steadily appreciating against the U.S. dollar.[127] In 2009, a rising rupee prompted the Government of India to purchase 200 tons of gold for $6.7 billion from the IMF.[128]
[edit]Income and consumption
India's gross national income per capita in 2008 was $1040.[129] Indian official estimates of the extent of poverty have been subject to debate, with concerns being raised about the methodology for the determination of the poverty line.[130][131] As of 2005, according to World Bank statistics, 75.6% of the population lived on less than $2 a day (PPP), while 41.6% of the population was living below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP) per day.[132][133][134] However, data released in 2009 by the Government of India estimated that 37% of the population lived below the poverty line.[4]
Housing is modest. According to The Times of India, a majority of Indians had a per capita space equivalent to or less than a 100 square feet (9.3 m2) room for their basic living needs, and one-third of urban Indians lived in "homes too cramped to exceed even the minimum requirements of a prison cell in the US."[135] The average is 103 sq ft (9.6 m2) per person in rural areas and 117 sq ft (10.9 m2) per person in urban areas.[135]
Around half of Indian children are malnourished. The proportion of underweight children is nearly double that of Sub-Saharan Africa.[136][137]However, India has not had any major famines since Independence.[138] A 2007 report by the state-run National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) found that 65% of Indians, or 750 million people, lived on less than 20 (US$0.44) per day,[139] with most working in "informal labour sector with no job or social security, living in abject poverty."[140]
Since the early 1950s, successive governments have implemented various schemes to alleviate poverty, under central planning, that have met with partial success. All these programmes have relied upon the strategies of the Food for work programme and National Rural Employment Programme of the 1980s, which attempted to use the unemployed to generate productive assets and build rural infrastructure.[141] In August 2005, the Parliament of India, in response to the perceived failure of economic growth to gene rate employment for the rural poor, passed theRural Employment Guarantee Bill into law, guaranteeing 100 days of minimum wage employment to every rural household in all the districts of India.[142] The question of whether economic reforms have reduced poverty has fuelled debates without generating clear-cut answers and has also increased political pressure against further economic reforms, especially those involving the downsizing of labour and cutting agricultural subsidies.[143] Recent statistics in 2010 point out that the number of high income households has crossed lower income households.[144]
[edit]Employment
India's labor regulations – among the most restrictive and complex in the world – have constrained the growth of the formal manufacturing sector where these laws have their widest application. Better designed labor regulations can attract more labor- intensive investment and create jobs for India's unemployed millions and those trapped in poor quality jobs. Given the country's momentum of growth, the window of opportunity must not be lost for improving the job prospects for the 80 million new entrants who are expected to join the work force over the next decade.
– World Bank: India Country Overview 2008.[145]
Agricultural and allied sectors accounted for about 52.1% of the total workforce in 2009–10.[77] While agriculture has faced stagnation in growth, services have seen a steady growth. Of the total workforce, 7% is in the organised sector, two-thirds of which are in the public sector.[146] The NSSO survey estimated that in 2004–05, 8.3% of the population was unemployed, an increase of 2.2% over 1993 levels, with unemployment uniformly higher in urban areas and among women.[147][148] Growth of labour stagnated at around 2% for the decade between 1994–2005, about the same as that for the preceding decade.[142] Avenues for employment generation have been identified in the IT and travel and tourism sectors, which have been experiencing high annual growth rates of above 9%.[149]
Unemployment in India is characterised by chronic (disguised) unemployment. Government schemes that target eradication of both poverty and unemployment (which in recent decades has sent millions of poor and unskilled people into urban areas in search of livelihoods) attempt to solve the problem, by providing financial assistance for setting up businesses, skill honing, setting up public sector enterprises, reservations in governments, etc. The decline in organised employment due to the decreased role of the public sector after liberalisation has further underlined the need for focusing on better education and has also put political pressure on further reforms.[150] [151] India's labour regulations are heavy even by developing country standards and analysts have urged the government to abolish or modify them in order to make the environment more conducive for employment generation.[152][153] The 11th five-year plan has also identified the need for a congenial environment to be created for employment generation, by reducing the number of permissions and other bureaucratic clearences required.[154] Further, inequalities and inadequacies in the education system have been identified as an obstacle preventing the benefits of increased employment opportunities from reaching all sectors of society.[155]
Child labour in India is a complex problem that is basically rooted in poverty, coupled with a failure of governmental policy, which has focused on subsidising higher rather than elementary education, as a result benefiting the privileged rather than the poorer sections of society.[156]The Indian government is implementing the world's largest child labour elimination program, with primary education targeted for ~250 million. Numerous non-governmental and voluntary organisations are also involved. Special investigation cells have been set up in states to enforce existing laws banning the employment of children under 14 in hazardous industries. The allocation of the Government of India for the eradication of child labour was $21 million in 2007.[157] Public campaigns, provision of meals in school and other incentives have proven successful in increasing attendance rates in schools in some states.[158]
In 2009–10, remittances from Indian migrants overseas stood at 250,000 crore (US$55.5 billion), the highest in the world, but their share in FDI remained low at around 1%.[159] India ranked 133th on the Ease of Doing Business Index 2010, behind countries such as China (89th), Pakistan (85th), and Nigeria (125th).[160]
[edit]Economic trends and issues
In the revised 2007 figures, based on increased and sustaining growth, more inflows into foreign direct investment, Goldman Sachs predicts that "from 2007 to 2020, India's GDP per capita in US$ terms will quadruple", and that the Indian economy will surpass the United States (in US$) by 2043.[12] In spite of the high growth rate, the report stated that India would continue to remain a low-income country for decades to come but could be a "motor for the world economy" if it fulfills its growth potential.[12]
[edit]Agriculture
Slow agricultural growth is a concern for policymakers as some two-thirds of India's people depend on rural employment for a living. Current agricultural practices are neither economically nor environmentally sustainable and India's yields for many agricultural commodities are low. Poorly maintained irrigation systems and almost universal lack of good extension services are among the factors responsible. Farmers' access to markets is hampered by poor roads, rudimentary market infrastructure, and excessive regulation.
– World Bank: "India Country Overview 2008"[145]
India's population is growing faster than its ability to produce rice and wheat.[161] The low productivity in India is a result of several factors. According to the World Bank, India's large agricultural subsidies are hampering productivity-enhancing investment. While overregulation of agriculture has increased costs, price risks and uncertainty, governmental intervention in labour, land, and credit markets are hurting the market. Infrastructure and services are inadequate.[162] Further, the average size of land holdings is very small, with 70% of holdings being less than one hectare in size.[163] The partial failure of land reforms in many states, exacerbated by poorly maintained or non-existent land records, has resulted in sharecropping with cultivators lacking ownership rights, and consequently low productivity of labour.[164] Adoption of modern agricultural practices and use of technology is inadequate, hampered by ignorance of such practices, high costs, illiteracy, slow progress in implementing land reforms, inadequate or inefficient finance and marketing services for farm produce and impracticality in the case of small land holdings. The allocation of water is inefficient, unsustainable and inequitable. The irrigation infrastructure is deteriorating.[162] Irrigation facilities are inadequate, as revealed by the fact that only 39% of the total cultivable land was irrigated as of 2010,[80] resulting in farmers still being dependent on rainfall, specifically the monsoon season, which is often inconsistent and unevenly distributed across the country.[165]
[edit]Corruption
Corruption has been one of the pervasive problems affecting India. The economic reforms of 1991 reduced the red tape, bureaucracy and the Licence Raj that were largely blamed for the institutionalised corruption and inefficiency.[166] Yet, a 2005 study by Transparency International(TI) found that more than half of those surveyed had firsthand experience of paying bribe or peddling influence to get a job done in a public office.[167]
The Right to Information Act (2005) which requires government officials to furnish information requested by citizens or face punitive action, computerisation of services, and various central and state government acts that established vigilance commissions, have considerably reduced corruption and opened up avenues to redress grievances.[167] The 2010 report by TI ranks India at 87th place and states that significant setbacks were made by India in reducing corruption.[168]
The current government has concluded that most spending fails to reach its intended recipients. A large, cumbersome and overworked bureaucracy also contributes to administrative inefficiency.[169] India's absence rates are one of the worst in the world; one study found that 25% of public sector teachers and 40% of public sector medical workers could not be found at the workplace.[170][171]
The Indian economy continues to face the problem of an underground economy with a 2006 estimate by the Swiss Banking Associationsuggesting that India topped the worldwide list for black money with almost $1,456 billion stashed in Swiss banks. This amounts to 13 times the country's total external debt.[172][173]
[edit]Education
India has made huge progress in terms of increasing primary educationattendance rate and expanding literacy to approximately two thirds of the population.[174] The right to education at elementary level has been made one of the fundamental rights under the eighty-sixth Amendment of 2002, and legislation has been enacted to further the objective of providing free education to all children.[175] However, the literacy rate of 74% is still lower than the worldwide average and the country suffers from a high dropout rate.[176] Further, there exist severe disparities in literacy rates and educational opportunities between males and females, urban and rural areas, and among different social groups.[177]
[edit]Infrastructure
In the past, development of infrastructure was completely in the hands of the public sector and was plagued by slow progress, poor quality and inefficiency.[178] India's low spending on power, construction, transportation, telecommunications and real estate, at $31 billion or 6% of GDP in 2002 had prevented India from sustaining higher growth rates. This has prompted the government to partially open up infrastructure to the private sector allowing foreign investment,[141][179] and most public infrastructure, barring railways, is today constructed and maintained by private contractors, in exchange for tax and other concessions from the government.[180]
Some 600 million Indians have no electricity at all.[181] While 80% of Indian villages have at least an electricity line, just 44% of rural households have access to electricity. Some half of the electricity is stolen, compared with 3% in China. The stolen electricity amounts to 1.5% of GDP.[182][183] Transmission and distribution losses amount to around 20%, as a result of an inefficient distribution system, handled mostly by cash-strapped state-run enterprises.[184] Almost all of the electricity in India is produced by the public sector. Power outages are common, and many buy their own power generators to ensure electricity supply.[181] As of 2006–07 the electricity production was at 652.2 billion kWh, with an installed capacity of 128400 MW.[185] In 2007, electricity demand exceeded supply by 15%.[181] However, reforms brought about by theElectricity Act of 2003 caused far-reaching policy changes, including mandating the separation of generation, transmission and distribution aspects of electricity, abolishing licencing requirements in generation and opening up the sector to private players, thereby paving the way for creating a competitive market-based electricity sector.[186] Substantial improvements in water supply infrastructure, both in urban and rural areas, have taken place over the past decade, with the proportion of the population having access to safe drinking water rising from 66% in 1991 to 92% in 2001 in rural areas, and from 82% to 98% in urban areas. however, quality and availability of water supply remains a major problem even in urban India, with most cities getting water for only a few hours during the day.[187]
India has the world's third largest road network,[188] covering about 3.3 million kilometers and carrying 65% of freight and 80% of passenger traffic.[189] Container traffic is growing at 15% a year.[190] India has a national teledensity rate of 67.67% with 806.1 million telephone subscribers, two-thirds of them in urban areas,[191] but Internet use is rare—there were only 10.29 million broadband lines in India in September 2010. However, this is growing and is expected to boom following the expansion of 3G and wimax services.[192]
[edit]Economic disparities
Lagging states need to bring more jobs to their people by creating an attractive investment destination. Reforming cumbersome regulatory procedures, improving rural connectivity, establishing law and order, creating a stable platform for natural resource investment that balances business interests with social concerns, and providing rural finance are important.
– World Bank: India Country Overview 2008[145]
A critical problem facing India's economy is the sharp and growing regional variations among India's different states and territories in terms of poverty, availability of infrastructure and socio-economic development.[194] Six low-income states – Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Uttar Pradesh – are home to more than one third of India's population.[195]Severe disparities exist among states in terms of income, literacy rates, life expectancy and living conditions.[196]
The five-year plans, especially in the pre-liberalisation era, attempted to reduce regional disparities by encouraging industrial development in the interior regions and distributing industries across states, but the results have not been very encouraging since these measures in fact increased inefficiency and hampered effective industrial growth.[197] After liberalisation, the more advanced states have been better placed to benefit from them, with well-developed infrastructure and an educated and skilled workforce, which attract the manufacturing and service sectors. The governments of backward regions are trying to reduce disparities by offering tax holidays and cheap land, and focusing more on sectors like tourism which, although being geographically and historically determined, can become a source of growth and develops faster than other sectors.[198][199]
[edit]See also
- Economic reforms in India
- Indian Construction Industry
- Indian states ranking by families owning house
- List of companies of India
- List of the largest trading partners of India
- Media of India
[edit]Notes
- ^ a b c d e f g "India". Report for Selected Countries and Subjects. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 2011-01-07.
- ^ "Indian economy grows by 8.2% in Q3". The Economic Times. 2010-08-31. Retrieved 2011-01-07.
- ^ "Index Numbers of Wholesale Prices in India". Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. Retrieved 2011-03-18.
- ^ a b "New math: 37% Indians live below poverty line". The Economic Times. 2009-12-11. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ a b c "Report on Employment & Unemployment Survey (2009–10)". Bureau of Labor Statistics, Indian Government. October 8, 2010. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ a b "Doing Business in India 2010". World Bank. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 917
- ^ "Net official development assistance received (current US$)". World Bank. Retrieved 2011-03-19.
- ^ "India's surprising economic miracle". The Economist. 2010-09-30. Retrieved 2010-09-30.
- ^ a b c "Economic survey of India 2007: Policy Brief" (PDF).OECD. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- ^ a b Edward A. Gargan (1992-08-15). "India Stumbles in Rush to a Free Market Economy". The New York Times. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ a b c "India's Rising Growth Potential" (PDF). Goldman Sachs. 2007. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- ^ Paromita Shastri (2008-05-31). "Economy cools as inflation fears rise". Mint. Retrieved 2011-01-08.
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, pp. 1–2.
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, pp. 4–5.
- ^ a b c d e "CIA – The World Factbook – India". CIA. 2007-09-20. Retrieved 2007-10-02.
- ^ a b "Country Profile: India" (PDF). Library of Congress –Federal Research Division. December 2004. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ a b Panagariya 2008, p. 109
- ^ Donkin, Robin A. (August 2003). Between East and West: The Moluccas and the Traffic in Spices Up to the Arrival of Europeans. Diane Publishing Company. ISBN 0-87169-248-1.
- ^ Nehru, Jawaharlal (1946). The Discovery of India. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-303103-1.
- ^ Raychaudhuri & Habib 2004, pp. 17–18
- ^ Raychaudhuri & Habib 2004, pp. 40–41
- ^ Raychaudhuri & Habib 2004, pp. 10–13
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 14
- ^ Sankaran, S (1994). "3". Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development. Margham Publications. p. 50. ISBN.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 15
- ^ Raychaudhuri & Habib 2004, pp. 360–361
- ^ Kumar 2005, p. 3
- ^ Kumar 2005, pp. 5–8
- ^ Kumar 2005, p. 26
- ^ "Of Oxford, economics, empire, and freedom". The Hindu(Chennai). 2005-10-02. Retrieved 2010-12-06.
- ^ Roy 2006, pp. 158–160
- ^ Kumar 2005, pp. 538–540
- ^ Kumar 2005, pp. 826–827
- ^ Kumar 2005, pp. 876–877
- ^ Kumar 2005, p. 422
- ^ Roy 2006, pp. 291–292
- ^ Roy 2006, p. 1
- ^ a b Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 179
- ^ Kumar 2005, p. 519
- ^ Kumar 2005, pp. 520–521
- ^ Roy 2006, pp. 22–24
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 31–32
- ^ Panagariya 2008, p. 24
- ^ Sam Staley (2006). "The Rise and Fall of Indian Socialism: Why India embraced economic reform". Reason. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 185–187
- ^ Cameron, John; Ndhlovu, P Tidings (September 2001). "Cultural Influences on Economic Thought in India: Resistance to diffusion of neo-classical economics and the principles of Hinduism"(PDF). Economic Issues 6 (2). Archived from the original on 2006-08-23. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Subroto Roy (1998-09-22). "Milton Friedman on the Nehru/Mahalanobis Plan". India Policy Institute. Retrieved 2005-07-16.
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 6–7
- ^ Salil Tripathi (2006-06-13). "Escaping the 'Hindu rate of growth'". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 2010-11-25.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 504–506
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 507
- ^ Ghosh, Arunabha (2004-06-01). "India's pathway through economic crisis(which makes failer of mixed economy)" (PDF).GEG Working Paper 2004/06. Global Economic Governance Programme. Retrieved 2009-12-12.
- ^ Task Force Report 2006, p. 7.
- ^ Task Force Report 2006, pp. 7–8.
- ^ "That old Gandhi magic". The Economist. 1997-11-27. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Kumar 2005, p. 1037
- ^ Task Force Report 2006, pp. 17–20.
- ^ S. Venkitaramanan (2003-02-10). "Moody's upgrade — Uplifts the mood but raises questions". Business Line. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Wilson, Dominic; Purushothaman, Roopa (2003-10-01)."DreamingWith BRICs: The Path to 2050" (PDF). Global economics paper No. 99. Goldman Sachs. Retrieved 2007-10-04.
- ^ Grammaticas, Damian (2007-01-24). "Indian economy 'to overtake UK'". BBC News. Retrieved 2007-01-26.
- ^ "The small car dream-merchants". The Economic Times. 2007-11-13. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- ^ Robyn Meredith (2007-04-16). "The Next People's Car". Forbes. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Please see the sources for the List of countries by GDP sector composition. The data is compiled through CIA World Factbookfigures.
- ^ Task Force Report 2006, pp. 9–10.
- ^ Kumar 2005, pp. 1040–1041
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 646
- ^ "Helping Tirupur emerge as a leader in knitwear exports in India". The Hindu (Chennai). 2007-06-11. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 668–669
- ^ Sramana Mitra (2008-02-29). "The Coming Death Of Indian Outsourcing". Forbes. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- ^ Niraj Sheth (2009-05-28). "Outlook for Outsourcing". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2010-04-05.
- ^ "National Mineral Scenario". Ministry of Mines, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-19.
- ^ a b "Retailing in India: Unshackling the chain stores". The Economist. 2008-05-29. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- ^ Mudur, Ganapati (June 2004). "Hospitals in India woo foreign patients". British Medical Journal 328 (7452): 1338.doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1338. PMC 420282.PMID 15178611.
- ^ a b c "India's Position in World Agriculture". Agricultural Statistics At a Glance 2010. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ "Three Largest Producing States of Important Crops During 2008–09". Agricultural Statistics At a Glance 2010. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ a b Economic Survey 2010, p. 180.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 499–501
- ^ "India – Land and Water Resources at a glance". Central Water Commission, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ a b "State-Wise Details Of Net Irrigated Area (NIA), Net Sown Area (NSA) And Percentage Of NIA To NSA". Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ "Diversify fishing methods, says Pawar". The Hindu (Chennai). 2008-01-05. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
- ^ "Major Food And Agricultural Commodities And Producers – Countries By Commodity". FAO. Retrieved 2009-12-12.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 858
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 838–839
- ^ Jayati Ghosh (2005-07-21). "Bank Nationalisation: The Record". Macroscan. Economic Research Foundation. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 839–842
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 334–335
- ^ "Reforming India's Financial System" (PDF). United Nations Public Administration Network. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ Jeetha D'Silva (2007-09-01). "India growth story is attracting talent from govt establishments". Mint. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 854–855
- ^ a b c d V. Ramakrishnan (2010-12-07). "Rupee Rally Falters as Oil Rises to Two-Year High". BusinessWeek. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 104
- ^ a b "Basic Statistics on Indian Petroleum & Natural Gas 2008–09". Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ "Reliance Net Beats Estimate After Boosting Natural Gas Sales". BusinessWeek. 2010-01-27. Retrieved 2010-04-05.
- ^ "Power Sector at a Glance". Ministry of Power, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-19.
- ^ "Inventory of Coal Resources of India". Ministry of Coal, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ "Uranium shortage holding back India's nuclear power drive".Mint. 2008-06-30. Retrieved 2010-04-05.
- ^ "Bush signs India-US nuclear deal into law". Mint. 2008-10-09. Retrieved 2010-04-05.
- ^ Srinivasan, T.N. (2002) (PDF). Economic Reforms and Global Integration. 17 January 2002. Economic Growth Center, Yale University. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 27–29
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 747–748
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 757
- ^ "Imports and Exports Databank". Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-04-05.
- ^ "India's Foreign Trade: November 2010". Press Release. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. 2011-01-03. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ "India & the World Trade Organization". Embassy of India. Archived from the original on 2005-06-13. Retrieved 2005-07-09.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 763–765
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, pp. 127–129.
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, p. 127.
- ^ a b "India's exports continue to fall". BBC News. 2009-07-01. Retrieved 2010-04-05.
- ^ Neelabh Chaturvedi (2009-08-27). "India Cuts Export Aim, Seeks Solace in New Markets". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2010-11-15.
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, pp. 142–144.
- ^ "Master Circular on External Commercial Borrowings and Trade Credits" (PDF). Reserve Bank of India. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, p. 132.
- ^ "FDI in India Statistics". Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. Retrieved 2010-11-22.
- ^ a b "India 2nd best country for biz investment: Survey". The Financial Express. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
- ^ "Next Big Spenders: India's Middle Class". Mckinsey.com. Retrieved 2010-04-05.
- ^ "India FDI Fact sheet – September 2010". Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Retrieved 2010-12-21.
- ^ Jaimini Bhagwati (2010-12-17). "Rationalising FDI taxes".Business Standard. Retrieved 2010-12-21.
- ^ Sushma Ramachandran (2005-02-25). "100 per cent FDI in construction industry through automatic route". The Hindu. Retrieved 2010-12-17.
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, p. 225.
- ^ "Your Guide to Money Matters". Reserve Bank of India. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ "25 paise and below coins not acceptable from June 30 - The Times of India". Times of India. Retrieved 2011-01-26.
- ^ "Govt to scrap 25 paise coins". NDTV. Retrieved 2011-01-26.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 812
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 887–888
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 822
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 823
- ^ "IMF Announces Sale of 200 metric tons of Gold to the Reserve Bank of India". International Monetary Fund. 2009-11-02. Retrieved 2010-04-18.
- ^ "Poverty at a Glance". World Bank. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ Jayati Ghosh (January 2010). "Poverty reduction in China and India: Policy implications of recent trends". DESA Working Paper No. 92. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 140–142
- ^ "Poverty data: A supplement to World Development Indicators 2008". World Bank. December 2008. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
- ^ "World Bank's new poverty norms find larger number of poor in India". The Hindu (Chennai). 2008-08-28. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
- ^ Steve Schifferes (2008-08-27). "World poverty 'more widespread'". BBC. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
- ^ a b Atul Thakur (2008-11-25). "33% of Indians live in less space than US prisoners". Times of India. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ "India: Undernourished Children: A Call for Reform and Action". World Bank. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ Drèze & Sen 1996, pp. 29–30
- ^ Drèze & Sen 1996, pp. 87–88
- ^ "Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihood in the Unorganised Sector" (PDF). Ministry of Small Scale Industries, Government of India. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- ^ "Nearly 80% of India Lives On Half Dollar A Day". Reuters. 2007-08-10. Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ a b c "Economic Survey 2004–2005". Retrieved 2006-07-15.
- ^ a b Panagariya 2008, p. 146
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 374–376
- ^ Prabhakar Sinha (2010-08-01). "'India has more rich people than poor now'". The Times of India. Retrieved 2010-11-15.
- ^ a b c "India Country Overview 2008". World Bank. 2008. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 423–424
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 432–433
- ^ Panagariya 2008, p. 147
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 429
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, pp. 275–277.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 434–436
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 431
- ^ Kaushik Basu (2005-06-27). "Why India needs labour law reform". BBC. Retrieved 2010-12-16.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 434
- ^ Drèze & Sen 1996, p. 39
- ^ Drèze & Sen 1996, pp. 119–120
- ^ "Child Labor and India — Embassy of India". Embassy of India. Archived from the original on 2007-10-23. Retrieved 2009-03-13.
- ^ Drèze & Sen 1996, pp. 130–131
- ^ Ajay Banerjee (2011-01-09). "NRIs don't invest as much as they remit, says Montek". The Tribune. Retrieved 2011-01-13.
- ^ Sapovadia, Vrajlal K; Mattioli, Maria C (June 2004). "Laws of Labor: Core Labor Standards and Global Trade". International Trade 26 (2).
- ^ Somini Sengupta (2008-06-22). "The Food Chain in Fertile India, Growth Outstrips Agriculture". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-03-29.
- ^ a b "India: Priorities for Agriculture and Rural Development". World Bank. Retrieved 2011-01-08.
- ^ Panagariya 2008, p. 318
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 320–321
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, p. 502
- ^ Drèze & Sen 1996, p. 180
- ^ a b Transparency International India. "India Corruption Study 2005" (PDF). Centre for Media Studies. Archived from the original on 2007-04-15. Retrieved 2008-03-14.
- ^ "2009 Corruption Perceptions Index reinforces link between poverty and corruption". Transparency International. Retrieved 2008-03-15.
- ^ "India's civil service: Battling the babu raj". The Economist. 2008-03-06. Retrieved 2011-01-08.
- ^ Karthik Muralidharan. "Teachers and Medical Worker Incentives in India" (PDF). University of California. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- ^ Kaushik Basu (2004-11-29). "Combating India's truant teachers". BBC. Retrieved 2011-01-09.
- ^ Kuldip Nayar (2011-02-04). "Laundering black money". Deccan Herald. Retrieved 2011-02-06.
- ^ V. Venkateswara Rao (2010-08-13). "Black, bold and bountiful". The Hindu Business Line. Retrieved 2011-02-06.
- ^ "Education in India". World Bank. Retrieved 2011-01-13.
- ^ Economic Survey 2010, pp. 280–281.
- ^ "A special report on India: An elephant, not a tiger". The Economist. 2008-12-11. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Drèze & Sen 1996, pp. 114–115
- ^ Panagariya 2008, p. 396
- ^ "Infrastructure the missing link". CNN. 2004-10-06. Retrieved 2005-08-14.
- ^ Panagariya 2008, p. 371
- ^ a b c "A special report on India: Creaking, groaning: Infrastructure is India's biggest handicap". The Economist. 2008-12-11. Retrieved 2011-01-09.
- ^ "Reforming the Power Sector: Controlling Electricity Theft and Improving Revenue" (PDF). The World Bank. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- ^ Mark Gregory (2006-03-15). "India struggles with power theft". BBC. Retrieved 2010-01-03.
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 386–387
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 384
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 388–390
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 427–428
- ^ "Infrastructure Rankings". CIA. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 403–404
- ^ "Ageing Indian infrastructure causes congestion". The Age(Melbourne). 2005-09-22.
- ^ "It's ringing mobiles throughout the country". The Tribune. 2011-03-05. Retrieved 2011-03-19.
- ^ Rajani Baburajan (2011-03-08). "Digital Revolution in India".Asia-Pacific Business and Technology Report. Retrieved 2011-03-19.
- ^ Karishma Vaswani (2007-05-21). "Winners and losers as India booms". BBC. Retrieved 2011-04-16.
- ^ Datt & Sundharam 2009, pp. 474–475
- ^ "Country Strategy for India (CAS) 2009–2012" (PDF). World Bank. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- ^ Drèze & Sen 1996, pp. 45–46
- ^ Panagariya 2008, pp. 164–165
- ^ Sachs, D. Jeffrey; Bajpai, Nirupam and Ramiah, Ananthi (2002)."Understanding Regional Economic Growth in India" (PDF).Working paper 88. Harvard University. Archived from the originalon 2007-07-01.
- ^ Kurian, N.J.. "Regional disparities in india". Planning Commission of India. Retrieved 2005-08-06.
[edit]References
- Books
- Datt, Ruddar; Sundharam, K.P.M. (2009). Indian Economy. New Delhi: S. Chand Group. p. 976. ISBN 978-81-219-0298-4.
- Drèze, John; Sen, Amartya (1996). India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford University Press. p. 292. ISBN 978-0-19-564082-3.
- Kumar, Dharma (2005). The Cambridge Economic History of India, Volume II : c. 1757 — 2003. New Delhi: Orient Longman. p. 1115. ISBN 978-81-250-2710-2.
- Nehru, Jawaharlal (1946). The Discovery of India. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-303103-1.
- Panagariya, Arvind (2008). India: The Emerging Giant. Oxford University Press. p. 514. ISBN 978-0-19-531503-5.
- Raychaudhuri, Tapan; Habib, Irfan (2004). The Cambridge Economic History of India, Volume I : c. 1200 — c. 1750. New Delhi: Orient Longman. p. 543. ISBN 978-81-250-2709-6.
- Roy, Tirthankar (2006). The Economic History of India 1857–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 385. ISBN 978-0-19-568430-8.
- Papers and reports
- "Economic reforms in India: Task force report" (PDF). University of Chicago. pp. 32. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- "Economic Survey 2009–10". Ministry of Finance, Government of India. pp. 294. Retrieved 2010-11-22.
[edit]Further reading
- Books
- Alamgir, Jalal (2008). India's Open-Economy Policy. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-77684-4.
- Bharadwaj, Krishna (1991). "Regional differentiation in India". In Sathyamurthy, T.V.. Industry & agriculture in India since independence. Oxford University Press. pp. 189–199. ISBN 0-19-564394-1.
- Articles
- "Milton Friedman on the Nehru/Mahalanobis Plan". Retrieved 2005-07-16.
- "Infrastructure in India: Requirements and favorable climate for foreign investment". Retrieved 2005-08-14.
- Bernardi, Luigi and Fraschini, Angela (2005). Tax System And Tax Reforms In India. Working paper n. 51.
- Centre for Media Studies (2005) (PDF). India Corruption Study 2005: To Improve Governance Volume – I: Key Highlights. Transparency International India. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- Ghosh, Jayati. "Bank Nationalisation: The Record". Macroscan. Retrieved 2005-08-05.
- Gordon, Jim and Gupta, Poonam (2003) (PDF). Understanding India's Services Revolution. 12 November 2003. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- Panagariya, Arvind (2004). India in the 1980s and 1990s: A Triumph of Reforms.
- Sachs, D. Jeffrey; Bajpai, Nirupam and Ramiah, Ananthi (2002) (PDF). Understanding Regional Economic Growth in India. Working paper 88. Archived from the original on 2007-07-01.
- Srinivasan, T.N. (2002) (PDF). Economic Reforms and Global Integration. 17 January 2002. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- Kurian, N.J.. "Regional disparities in india". Retrieved 2005-08-06.
- News
- "India says 21 of 29 states to launch new tax". Daily Times. 25 March 2005.
- "Economic structure". The Economist. 6 October 2003.
- "Regional stock exchanges – Bulldozed by the Big Two". Retrieved 2005-08-10.
[edit]External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Economy of India |
Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Economy of India |
- Government of India websites
- Finance Ministry of India
- India in Business- Official website for Investment and Trade in India
- Reserve Bank of India's database on the Indian economy
- Publications and statistics
- World Bank – India Country Overview
- Ernst & Young 2006 report on doing Business in India
- CIA – The World Factbook – India
|
|
|
|
|
Economic liberalisation in India
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(April 2011) |
The economic liberalisation in India refers to ongoing economic reforms in India that started in 1991. After Independence in 1947, India adhered to socialist policies. In the 1980s, Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi initiated some reforms. In 1991, after India sold 67 tons of gold to theInternational Monetary Fund (IMF), the government of P. V. Narasimha Rao and his finance minister Manmohan Singh started breakthrough reforms.[1] The new neo-liberal policies included opening for international trade and investment, deregulation, initiation of privatization, tax reforms, and inflation-controlling measures. The overall direction of liberalisation has since remained the same, irrespective of the ruling party, although no party has yet tried to take on powerful lobbies such as the trade unions and farmers, or contentious issues such as reforming labour laws and reducing agricultural subsidies.[2] The main objective of the government was to transform the economic system fromsocialism to capitalism so as to achieve high economic growth and industrialize the nation for the well-being of Indian citizens.[3][4] Today India is mainly characterized as a market economy.[5]
As of 2009, about 300 million people—equivalent to the entire population of the United States—have escaped extreme poverty.[6] The fruits of liberalisation reached their peak in 2007, when India recorded its highest GDP growth rate of 9%.[7] With this, India became the second fastest growing major economy in the world, next only to China.[8] An Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report states that the average growth rate 7.5% will double the average income in a decade, and more reforms would speed up the pace.[9]
Indian government coalitions have been advised to continue liberalisation. India grows at slower pace than China, which has been liberalising its economy since 1978.[10] McKinsey states that removing main obstacles "would free India's economy to grow as fast as China's, at 10 percent a year".[11]
For 2010, India was ranked 124th among 179th countries in Index of Economic Freedom World Rankings, which is an improvement from the preceding year.
Contents[hide] |
[edit]Pre-liberalisation policies
Part of a series on the | |
History of Modern India | |
Pre-Independence | |
British Raj (1858–1947) | |
Indian independence movement (1857–1947) | |
Partition of India (1947) | |
Post-Independence | |
Political integration of India (1947–49) | |
Indo-Pakistani War of 1947 | |
States Reorganisation Act (1956) | |
Non-Aligned Movement (1956– ) | |
Sino-Indian War (1962) | |
Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 | |
Green Revolution (1970s) | |
Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 | |
Emergency (1975–77) | |
Siachen conflict (1984) | |
1990s in India | |
Economic liberalisation in India | |
Kargil War (1999) | |
2000s in India | |
See also | |
History of India | |
History of South Asia | |
Indian economic policy after independence was influenced by the colonial experience (which was seen by Indian leaders as exploitative in nature) and by those leaders' exposure toFabian socialism. Policy tended towards protectionism, with a strong emphasis on import substitution, industrialization, state intervention in labour and financial markets, a large public sector, business regulation, and central planning.[12] Five-Year Plans of India resembled central planning in the Soviet Union. Steel, mining, machine tools, water,telecommunications, insurance, and electrical plants, among other industries, were effectivelynationalized in the mid-1950s.[13] Elaborate licences, regulations and the accompanying red tape, commonly referred to as Licence Raj, were required to set up business in India between 1947 and 1990.[14]
Before the process of reform began in 1991, the government attempted to close the Indian economy to the outside world. The Indian currency, the rupee, was inconvertible and high tariffs and import licensing prevented foreign goods reaching the market. India also operated a system of central planningfor the economy, in which firms required licenses to invest and develop. The labyrinthine bureaucracy often led to absurd restrictions—up to 80 agencies had to be satisfied before a firm could be granted a licence to produce and the state would decide what was produced, how much, at what price and what sources of capital were used. The government also prevented firms from laying off workers or closing factories. The central pillar of the policy wasimport substitution, the belief that India needed to rely on internal markets for development, not international trade—a belief generated by a mixture ofsocialism and the experience of colonial exploitation. Planning and the state, rather than markets, would determine how much investment was needed in which sectors.
In the 80s, the government led by Rajiv Gandhi started light reforms. The government slightly reduced License Raj and also promoted the growth of the telecommunications and softwareindustries.[citation needed]
The Vishwanath Pratap Singh government (1989–1990) and Chandra Shekhar Singhgovernment (1990–1991) did not add any significant reforms.
[edit]Impact
- The low annual growth rate of the economy of India before 1980, which stagnated around 3.5% from 1950s to 1980s, while per capita income averaged 1.3%.[16] At the same time,Pakistan grew by 5%, Indonesia by 9%, Thailand by 9%, South Korea by 10% and in Taiwan by 12%.[17]
- Only four or five licences would be given for steel, power and communications. License owners built up huge powerful empires.[15]
- A huge public sector emerged. State-owned enterprises made large losses.[15]
- Infrastructure investment was poor because of the public sector monopoly.[15]
- License Raj established the "irresponsible, self-perpetuating bureaucracy that still exists throughout much of the country"[18] andcorruption flourished under this system.[8]
[edit]Narasimha Rao government (1991–1996)
[edit]Crisis
The assassination of prime minister Indira Gandhi in 1984, and later of her son Rajiv Gandhi in 1991, crushed international investor confidence on the economy that was eventually pushed to the brink by the early 1990s.
As of 1991, India still had a fixed exchange rate system, where the rupee was pegged to the value of a basket of currencies of major trading partners. India started having balance of paymentsproblems since 1985, and by the end of 1990, it was in a serious economic crisis. The government was close to default,[19] its central bank had refused new credit and foreign exchange reserves had reduced to the point that India could barely finance three weeks' worth of imports.
A Balance of Payments crisis in 1991 pushed the country to near bankruptcy. In return for an IMF bailout, gold was transferred to London as collateral, the Rupeedevalued and economic reforms were forced upon India. That low point was the catalyst required to transform the economy through badly needed reforms to unshackle the economy. Controls started to be dismantled, tariffs, duties and taxesprogressively lowered, state monopolies broken, the economy was opened to trade and investment, private sector enterprise and competition were encouraged andglobalisation was slowly embraced. The reforms process continues today and is accepted by all political parties, but the speed is often held hostage by coalition politics and vested interests.
– India Report, Astaire Research[8]
[edit]Later reforms
- Atal Bihari Vajpayee's administration surprised many by continuing reforms, when it was at the helm of affairs of India for five years.[20]
- The Vajpayee administration continued with privatization, reduction of taxes, a sound fiscal policy aimed at reducing deficits and debts and increased initiatives for public works.
- The UF government attempted a progressive budget that encouraged reforms, but the 1997 Asian financial crisis and political instabilitycreated economic stagnation.
- Economic and technology-related sanctions have repeatedly not proved to be very effective in compelling nations to change their sovereign decisions made in enlightened self-interest. India faced severe sanctions after Pokhran-I (five nuclear tests on May 11 and 13, 1998 at the Pokhran range in Rajasthan Desert),and sanctions that were more comprehensive were imposed following Pokhran-II. There were dire predictions of the collapse of the economy, double-digit inflation etc.
- After five years, most of the sanctions have been lifted and the Indian economy is continuing to grow at an acceptably satisfactory rate. The anticipated growth rate for 2003-04 is 6.0%. Though India's Gross National Income is only $477.4 billion by conventional calculations, it translates into $2,913 billion purchasing power parity (PPP), according to the latest world development indicators. In PPP terms, it is the world's fourth largest economy, behind only the US, China and Japan.
- This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
[edit]Impact of reforms
The impact of these reforms may be gauged from the fact that total foreign investment (includingforeign direct investment, portfolio investment, and investment raised on international capital markets) in India grew from a minuscule US$132 million in 1991–92 to $5.3 billion in 1995–96.[22]
Cities like Gurgaon, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune, Chennai and Ahmedabad have risen in prominence and economic importance, become centres of rising industries and destination forforeign investment and firms.
Annual growth in GDP per capita has accelerated from just 1¼ per cent in the three decades after Independence to 7½ per cent currently, a rate of growth that will double average income in a decade. [...] In service sectors where government regulation has been eased significantly or is less burdensome—such ascommunications, insurance, asset management and information technology—output has grown rapidly, with exports of information technology enabled servicesparticularly strong. In those infrastructure sectors which have been opened to competition, such as telecoms and civil aviation, the private sector has proven to be extremely effective and growth has been phenomenal.
Election of AB Vajpayee as Prime Minister of India in 1998 and his agenda was a welcome change. His prescription to speed up economic progress included solution of all outstanding problems with the West (Cold War related) and then opening gates for FDI investment. In three years, the West was developing a bit of a fascination to India's brainpower, powered by IT and BPO. By 2004, the West would consider investment in India, should the conditions permit. By the end of Vajpayee's term as Prime Minister, a framework for the foreign investment had been established. The new incoming government of Professor Manmohan Singh in 2004 is further strengthening the required infrastructure to welcome the FDI.
Today, fascination with India is translating into active consideration of India as a destination for FDI. The A T Kearney study is putting India second most likely destination for FDI in 2005 behind China. It has displaced US to the third position. This is a great leap forward. India was at the 15th position, only a few years back. Thanks to the hard work of the politicians in control in Delhi for the last five years. To quote the A T Kearney Study "India's strong performance among manufacturing and telecom & utility firms was driven largely by their desire to make productivity-enhancing investments in IT, business process outsourcing, research and development, and knowledge management activities".
Still, India has not made into the grade where manufacturing investment will be targeted to it. That status belongs to China. But, progressively positive noises are being heard in the world financial circles to consider India at par with China. A few of the remaining antiquated labor laws in India need to be repealed and neglected infrastructure are upgraded to put an investor at ease. The irony is that all plans to redress the labor laws or upgrading of the infrastructure are shot down by left leaning politicians at the federal level. Only recently a proposal to use a part of India's huge foreign reserves to rebuild infrastructure was shot down by these politicians. To the contrary, they have nothing-worthwhile alternative to offer.
[edit]Ongoing economic challenges
- Problems in the agricultural sector.
- Highly restrictive and complex labour laws.[9][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]
- Inadequate infrastructure, which is often government monopoly.
- Failing education.
- Inefficient public sector.
- Inflation in basic consumable goods.
- Corruption
- High fiscal deficit
- This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
OECD summarized the key reforms that are needed:
In labour markets, employment growth has been concentrated in firms that operate in sectors not covered by India's highly restrictive labour laws. In the formal sector, where these labour laws apply, employment has been falling and firms are becoming more capital intensive despite abundant low-cost labour. Labour market reform is essential to achieve a broader-based development and provide sufficient and higher productivity jobs for the growing labour force. In product markets, inefficient government procedures, particularly in some of the states, acts as a barrier to entrepreneurship and need to be improved. Public companies are generally less productive than private firms and the privatisation programme should be revitalised. A number of barriers to competition in financial markets and some of the infrastructure sectors, which are other constraints on growth, also need to be addressed. The indirect tax system needs to be simplified to create a true national market, while for direct taxes, the taxable base should be broadened and rates lowered. Public expenditure should be re-oriented towards infrastructure investment by reducing subsidies. Furthermore, social policies should be improved to better reach the poor and—given the importance of human capital—the education system also needs to be made more efficient.
– OECD[9]
[edit]Reforms at the state level
The Economic Survey of India 2007 by OECD concluded:
At the state level, economic performance is much better in states with a relatively liberal regulatory environment than in the relatively more restrictive states".[9]
The analysis of this report suggests that the differences in economic performance across states are associated with the extent to which states have introduced market-oriented reforms. Thus, further reforms on these lines, complemented with measures to improve infrastructure, education and basic services, would increase the potential for growth outside of agriculture and thus boost better-paid employment, which is a key to sharing the fruits of growth and lowering poverty.[9]
[edit]See also
[edit]References
- ^ Timeline:India -BBC 1991
- ^ "That old Gandhi magic". The Economist. 27 November 1997.[dead link]
- ^ "India's surprising economic miracle". The Economist. 30 September 2010. Retrieved Sep 30th 2010.
- ^ Chakrabarti, Anjan; Cullenberg, Stephen (2003). Transition from socialism to capitalism in india. ISBN 9780415934855.
- ^ "India's great journey to market economy". Rediff.com. Retrieved 2010-03-29.
- ^ Nick Gillespie (2008). "What Slumdog Millionaire can teach Americans about economic stimulus". Reason.
- ^ https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html#Econ
- ^ a b c "The India Report". Astaire Research.
- ^ a b c d e f "Economic survey of India 2007: Policy Brief". OECD.
- ^ "India's economy: What's holding India back?". The Economist. 6 March 2008.
- ^ "The McKinsey Quarterly: India—From emerging to surging". The McKinsey Quarterly.
- ^ Kelegama, Saman and Parikh, Kirit (2000). Political Economy of Growth and Reforms in South Asia. Second Draft.
- ^ Sam Staley (2006). "The Rise and Fall of Indian Socialism: Why India embraced economic reform".
- ^ Street Hawking Promise Jobs in Future, The Times of India, 2001-11-25
- ^ a b c d "India: the economy". BBC. 12 February 1998.
- ^ "Redefining The Hindu Rate Of Growth". The Financial Express.
- ^ "Industry passing through phase of transition". The Tribune India.
- ^ Eugene M. Makar (2007). An American's Guide to Doing Business in India.
- ^ India's Pathway through Financial Crisis. Arunabha Ghosh. Global Economic Governance Programme. Retrieved on 2 March 2007.
- ^ J. Bradford DeLong (2001). "India Since Independence: An Analytic Growth Narrative".
- ^ "HSBC GLT frontpage". Retrieved 2008-08-22.
- ^ Local industrialists against multinationals. Ajay Singh and Arjuna Ranawana. Asiaweek. Retrieved on 2 March 2007.
- ^ "IMF calls for urgent reform in Indian labour laws".
- ^ Kaushik Basu, Gary S. Fields, and Shub Debgupta."Retrenchment, Labor Laws and Government Policy: An Analysis with Special Reference to India". The World Bank.
- ^ R. C. Datta / Milly Sil (2007). "Contemporary Issues on Labour Law Reform in India".
- ^ Aditya Gupta (2006). "How wrong has the Indian Left been about economic reforms?".
- ^ Basu, Kaushik (27 June 2005). "Why India needs labour law reform". BBC.
- ^ "A special report on India: An elephant, not a tiger". The Economist. 11 December 2008.
- ^ "India Country Overview 2008". The World Bank. 2008.
- ^ Gurcharan Das (July/August 2006). "The India Model". The Foreign Affairs.
[edit]External links
- For a short educational video of the "economic history of India".
- Nick Gillespie (2009). "What Slumdog Millionaire can teach Americans about economic stimulus". Reason.
- Gurcharan Das (2006). "The India Model". The Foreign Affairs.
- Aditya Gupta (2006). "How wrong has the Indian Left been about economic reforms?". Centre for Civil Society.
- "The India Report". Astaire Research. 2007.
No comments:
Post a Comment