Indian Holocaust My Father`s Life and Time: Fwd: [bangla-vision] Islamic victories. RE: Thanks to Shabbir and Agha Khanis.... RE: MULLAH MAUDUDI WAS A CRIMINAL OF ISLAM. KOKI IS HIS MENTAL PROGENY.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: kaukab siddique <butshikan@msn.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:32 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] Islamic victories. RE: Thanks to Shabbir and Agha Khanis.... RE: MULLAH MAUDUDI WAS A CRIMINAL OF ISLAM. KOKI IS HIS MENTAL PROGENY.

Mr. Anizer

Try to go outside Zionist propaganda.

NATO has 150,000 troops in Afghanistan. Guess who is winning. The Taliban.

US has 135,000 troops in Iraq. Guess who has won? The Islamic forces. USA is desperately trying to withdraw.

Palestine is occupied by the Jews of Israel but today Israel has become a pariah.

In Pakistan, Jamaate Islami has become a major force and is making American policies futile.

Try to meet some real Muslims or real Christians.

Aga Khan is misleading you.

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:54:18 -0500
Subject: Re: Thanks to Shabbir and Agha Khanis.... RE: MULLAH MAUDUDI WAS A CRIMINAL OF ISLAM. KOKI IS HIS MENTAL PROGENY.
From: badshahanizer@gmail.com
To: butshikan@msn.com
CC: drshabbir@bellsouth.net; yas1rkhan@hotmail.com; zina.khan@yahoo.com; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca; drmaqazi@yahoo.com; hasniessa@yahoo.com; mohanofchenai@gmail.com; moderate53@yahoo.com; sharouq@gmail.com; bahramji@gmail.com; ank2000pk@yahoo.com; mukhtaralam2000@yahoo.com; mathews_kuruvilla06@yahoo.co.in; atif98@yahoo.com; iftekhar.hai@gmail.com; ummaabroadcasting@rollanet.org; premsadani@hotmail.com; saima29@gmail.com; sohailhashmi@gmail.com; sals420@gmail.com; mikeghouse@aol.com; drmookhi@hotmail.com; tarekfatah@rogers.com; mnaquvi@yahoo.com; azam.sikandar@gmail.com; tirmidhi@hotmail.com; alishaban952@yahoo.com; great72000@yahoo.com; hassan_javid@hotmail.com; aleem.faizee@gmail.com; faruquealamgir@yahoo.com; drshabbir@comcast.net; salsabeel65@yahoo.com; khasif235e@yahoo.com; zakhum@hotmail.com; firasat777@yahoo.com; anwerkhurshid@hotmail.com; yunussidira@yahoo.com; ssmeezan@hotmail.com; ahlam_albahr@yahoo.com; amino66@hotmail.com; k2411871@hotmail.com; pk4318@yahoo.com; april702@cox.net; auzyxkhan@yahoo.co.uk; gul_badshah@yahoo.com; shariq.hamid@yahoo.co.in; ahmadtotonji@yahoo.com; sarwar@muslim-ed-trust.org.uk; mirza.syed@gmail.com; khattak99@yahoo.com; bintwaleed@yahoo.com; gafoor111@yahoo.com; cssharif@yahoo.com; nomani_z@yahoo.com; asra@asranomani.com; yousuftabish@yahoo.com; rafiq786@cbn.net.id; rial982000@yahoo.com; sohail972002@yahoo.co.in; aeisha_786@yahoo.com; bushra_meraj@yahoo.com; cherylin_bas@yahoo.com; doctor_aliasghar@yahoo.com; engrbbkarube@yahoo.com; knowledge4all00@yahoo.com; kristonia7@yahoo.com; hussain@nifty.com; juan.suquillo@gmail.com; fayyaz@reading.org; znanwalla@gmail.com; ahumanb@yahoo.com; akbar@mostmerciful.com; mohanofchenai@googlemail.com; brilliant005@hotmail.com; umah.hai@hotmail.com; farzanaqazi@yahoo.com; tsidd96472@aol.com; africawalla@gmail.com; reform@dawoodi-bohras.com; ibramsha7@yahoo.com; doctorforu123@yahoo.com; minayet@yahoo.com; nssjobs@att.net; farrukhabidi@yahoo.com; webmaster9@mostmerciful.com; bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com; pakistanaffairs@yahoogroups.com; islam-n-muslims@yahoogroups.com

Kaukab, Unfortunately your opinion is not of any consequence to the Intelligent and discerning people generally speaking , them now knowing effectively about your mindset and flair for dishonesty and lack of jurisprudence....

The reality is that Islam today is in turbulence and it is NOT the " greatest force " as you seem to claim - rather people have begun to dislike us and over 60% of the population is in poverty and dependant on charity and loans....Many Intellectuals have left the fold....the day you can turn things around in such a manner that everyone wants to be like muslims, then muslims will become the force you dream of....if carrying a gun or strapping a bomb and blowing children and women is a great force then surely not of the Prophet's religion, if I may say so...

I am not sure what you are trying to say, unless what you mean is that all this rhetoric of your sect, helped create terrorism and perpetual conflicts....

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:29 PM, kaukab siddique <butshikan@msn.com> wrote:

Asalamu alaikum

Maulana Maudoodi is the intellectual leader of a vast Islanic movement. Jamaate islami is strong enough to make his enemies look ridiculous. However the joint Aga khani and pervezi attack gives me the opportunity to present an article I wrote to show how Maudoodi has helped Muslims to wake up. This book has taken modern Islamic movements to become the greatest force in the Muslim world.
----------------------------------------------------------------

KHILAFAT-o-MULUKIAT (Caliphate and Monarchy): Too Great a Book for small minds
by Kaukab Siddique, Ph.D

Maulana Maudoodi (r) had the rare genius of bringing into focus the original era of Islam, teaching the Qur'an as understood by the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself and the sahaba (the Prophet's blessed companions). Like the thought of Iqbal and Mohomed Ali Jinnah, Maudoodi's writings went through various stages of development. I consider his book KHILAFAT-o-MULUKIAT the pinnacle of his achievement as a thinker and leader of Islamic resurgence. The book, first published in October 1966, was too radical even for Jamaate Islami but over the years its ideas have percolated worldwide into the international Islamic movement's ideology.

Maudoodi was targeted by two groups of obscurantist forces. On the one hand, there were the petty mullahs who wrote tracts claiming that the learned Maulana had insulted hazrat Usman (r) and hence was to be seen as crypto-shia. On the other hand, the secularist groups saw his writing as a threat to their entire concept of Islam as a private religion. This unholy alliance of the petty mullah and the secularist, in a low level crude and school-boy style, can be seen in the hate bulletins Pervezis keep issuing against Maudoodi.
These persons are quite incapable of understanding Maudoodi's greatest book. Before I deal with their petty attacks, let us look at the book KHILAFAT-o-MULUKIAT as a whole. It has three important aspects which put it in a class by itself:

1. Maudoodi points out from the Qur'an and the Hadith what constituted the original concept of Islamic government as established by the Prophet (pbuh) himself and as understood by the sahaba. In this aspect, he lists Qur'anic verses and authentic hadith. Owing to these original teachings, MUSLIMS SEE THE RIGHTLY GUIDED CALIPHATE (khilafate rashida) as qualitatively different from the rule of the Ummayads, Abbasids and later dynasties. THIS DIFFERENTIATION IS KEY TO OUR UNDERSTANDING OF ISLAMIC HISTORY.

2. HOW and WHY did Caliphate lapse into monarchy and hereditary rule? This is a very sensitive issue because the kings have left a lasting impression on the history of Muslims and do not encourage a critical look at their illegitimacy.

3. Once KINGSHIP had consolidated itself, what methods could Muslim use to change it or overthrow it? The issue of ARMED UPRISING against kingship which claims to be Muslim and permits the practice of the basics of Islam is again a difficult issue. Maudoodi was brilliant in his analysis of this issue and took Imam Abu Hanifa's example to discuss the issue.

Now look at S.M.'s petty attack on the erudite Maulana. S.M. begins by abusing the man of God. This is not surprising because no enemy of Islam is expected to respect Maudoodi. Then S.M. tries to defend his father's attack on KHILAFAT-o-MULUKIAT. I had pointed out that S.M.'s father has probably not read the book because he claims that it is an account of the fighting between the Banoo Umayya and the Banoo Hashim. S.M. skips this point (that his father's thesis is incorrect) and then tries to claim that the book IS a graphic account of Kerbala and other tragedies. For this purpose, S.M. quotes SIX LINES from page 180 of the book. If S.M. had taken the trouble to read the footnote at the end of page 180, he would have seen that these six lines are Maudoodi's summary of the following:
Tabari's Tarikh, vol.4, p.309 to 356, Ibn Athir's vol.3, p. 282 to 299 and Al Bidaya vol.8, p.170 to 204.
Thus Maudoodi had the powerful understanding to summarize 98 pages of history in 6 lines. Thus the six lines were definitely not GRAPHIC because Kerbala, though central to Islamic thought, was not Maudoodi's topic in this book. [Perhaps S.M. does not know the meaning of "graphic." In this context, it means "lively description" and Maudoodi was definitely not being graphic in his references to various tragedies.]

As if S.M. was not dense enough in his basic surmise, he goes on to prove that the book is beyond his secular view of Islam (which simply means kufr). Maudoodi quoted Qur'anic verses to indicate that the SOVEREIGNTY of ALLAH mentioned in the Qur'an is not separate from Allah as sovereign and ruler in the establishment of Islamic community and government. Thus Maudoodi was uncovering the great fracture in Muslim thought, which is the inability to apply overarching concepts to practical matters of political formulation. S.M. thinks these verses are "irrelevant" to Islamic political teachings. I would suggest that S.M might learn a lot about Islam if he humbly looks at the words of the Qur'an again.

WHEN IT COMES TO HADITH NARRATIONS and HADITH LITERATURE used in early Islamic history, S.M., like any westernized, mentally colonized person, reveals his inability to study or to understand. Poor S.M. took the trouble to scan a part of page 318 of Khilafat-o-Mulukiat to make the claim that Maudoodi is admitting that hadith narrations are NOT reliable. Quite the contrary! Maudoodi's statement would be easily acceptable for anyone who knows hadith. Here I'll try to help S.M. to write better next time and not make such a fool of himself:

1. Maudoodi is saying that Hadith related to AHKAM, on which rules of haram and halal are based, are scrutinized with great care as to the authenticity of their narrators and the continuity of their chains of narration.
2. By contrast, the same severe tests of continuity are not applied to narrations about history and events in the early era of Islam.
[This clear contrast between rules for the acceptance of normative hadith and narrations about historic events is well known to anyone who has studied hadith literature.]

Maudoodi's point cannot be refuted. The same historians who wrote about the tragedy of Kerbala also wrote about the great achievements of Abu Bakr, Umar, Usman and Ali (Allah be pleased with them). They honestly presented the good things the Ummayads did (we know from them about Umar ibn Abdul Aziz) and also criticized the crimes of the Abbasids under whose rule they lived.

The silliest of S.M.'s claims is the idea that Maudoodi wrote this book "to please Shi'ites."
Nothing could be further from the truth. The book is NOT about Shi'a and Sunni. It deals with the much more important issue of Caliphate without which the Muslim ummah cannot emerge from its decline.

I would urge Pervezis not to join hands with Aga Khanisto create fitna between Shias and Sunnis. There are differences between the two which need to be kept within the limits of civil discourse. Both Shias and Sunnis follow Allah and His Prophet (pbuh). Both have the same qibla and the same Book. Both accept the Sunnah. Like Maudoodi, our scholars should look objectively at Islamic history and honestly condemn MONARCHY as alien to Islam. We want caliphate based on Shoora. We do not want a false god of MARKAZE MILLAT (as taught by G.A. Pervez) or an attempt to fob off dictatorship as the equivalent of Qur'an and the Prophet (pbuh)!

Maudoodi, like Iqbal, has been misunderstood by small minds. The resurgent Islamic movement must learn from Maudoodi, not uncritically or slavishly but wisely, just as an intelligent son looks at a wise father and tries to do better than him.

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:07:51 -0700
From: drshabbir@bellsouth.net
Subject: MULLAH MAUDUDI WAS A CRIMINAL OF ISLAM. KOKI IS HIS MENTAL PROGENY.

THE MULLAH-IN-CHIEF OF THE 20TH CENTURY: MAUDUDI (1903-1979)
CHECK OUT YOUR OWN TAFHIM.

We will have to be brief about Maududi since he has written volumes upon volumes of nonsense. But a few glimpses should sufficiently demonstrate how the Mullah is playing god to his fans even after his death.

His Name: Before presenting some glimpses of the famous Mullah Maududi's wisdom and knowledge, let us reflect on his full name and title, Maulana Syed Abul A'la Maududi. The name translates as: "Our Master, Owner, the Father of the Most Glorious, Maududi". It is strange that the man claiming to be a great Islamic scholar lived 76 odd years with this name. Does it need much insight to see that the very name is shrieking outright divinity and Shirk? According to the Quran, Maulana (our Master) is none but Allah (9:51). And, obviously, Al-A'la (the Most Glorious) can be none but God. Note: In this chapter, as an example, 1:31 will mean Vol 1 page 31.

His Impact: The treacherous, imbecile Maududi, through his long, confused, confusing and inconclusive writings, has frozen the minds of millions of simple Muslims for the last half century making sure that the Ummah remains stuck in the spider-web of the manmade, counterfeit, Hadithi, Number Two Islam (N2I). The forsakers of the Quran got exactly what they deserved. A significant factor behind his popularity has been the generous royal Saudi support as in the case of the Egyptian Mullah-in-Chief, Syed Qutb in the 1950s.

Maududi's 'Brilliance': Let us examine some brilliance of Maududi through his famous Six Volume Tafseer, Tafhimul Quran (Urdu), by Idara Tarjumanul Quran, Lahore, November, 1982. We will turn to his other writings from time to time, with due reference given.

The Captive Women: 1:340 means Vol 1 Pg 340. The summary and conclusion of his discussion on war captives, Vol 1 Pg 340: Even today, the government must distribute the women war captives among Muslim soldiers and the soldiers should "use" them. This rule will apply to women regardless of whether they belong to the People of the Book, or any other religion. How would the Mullahs feel if Muslims, getting thrashed all around the world today, had their women treated by the 'infidels' in this abominable fashion?

The Quran, verse 47:4 states that the captives of war must be freed either for ransom (e.g. exchange of POWs) or as an act of kindness as soon as the battle ends. There is no third option. When an eminent scholar differed with him and showed how the Quran has closed the door of slavery forever, Maududi responded, "The error of this man lies in that he relies on the Quran to form his opinion." (Tafhimat 2:292)

Slavery: Maududi further alleges that:

v     A slave owner can sell his slave whenever and to whomever he pleases.

v     The act of kindness means that the captives be made slaves and given into the ownership of (Muslim) individuals.

v     A bondwoman given to any man by the rulers is as legal and binding a process as Nikah (marriage).

v     A captive of war will remain a slave even if he or she embraces Islam.

v     If a slave tries to escape or create mischief, the master has the right to kill him/her.

v     While the Shari'ah (religious law made up by Mullahs) has limited the number of wives to four, it places NO LIMIT to the number of concubines a man can possess. He can have sexual relations with them freely. There is no reason for any man to feel bad about having sex with these (captured) concubines. (Tafhimul Quran 1:340 onwards, and 5:14 onwards)

Beware! Dear reader, whenever you encounter statements like "Islam says this," or "Shari'ah states that," know that it is almost invariably the Mullah's own wishful thinking rather than the Word of God.

The Prophet's Broken Teeth: In Tafhimul Quran 5:14 and Tarjaman-ul-Quran 1975 Pg 93, Maududi, on the spurious authority of Ibn Hisham, happily relates that the idolater Sohail bin 'Umro was captured at the Battle of Badr. Some companions wanted to break his teeth, for he was a fiery orator against Islam. The Prophet admonished, "No! If I break his teeth, Allah will break my teeth even though I am a Prophet." Sohail was left alone, but even then, after one year, at the Battle of Uhud, the exalted Prophet's teeth were broken. In the Quran, Allah promises to protect the Prophet (S) from people (5:67). What sinister point is Maududi trying to make? Did the Prophet (S) really lose his teeth in the Battle of Uhud? He lived nine more years after that battle. I have not come across a single narrative suggesting any missing teeth on the person of the exalted Prophet.

Child Molestation: It is not only permissible to give in marriage the girls who have not had their menstrual periods yet. Rather, it is also permissible for the husbands to have sexual intercourse with them. Now it is obvious that something that has been allowed by the Quran, no Muslim has the right to declare it forbidden. (Mullah Maududi, Tafhimul Quran 5:571). Did he marry 'off' his daughters or nieces at age 6 or 9?

The Mullahs are in the habit of opposing the Quran since the Glorious Book hurts their evil desires. The big question arises here, "Does the Quran permit this nonsense?" Here is the answer:

The Marriageable Age: According to the Mullahs, the beginning of the menstrual cycles in a girl and nocturnal emissions in a boy are firm indicators of their age of marriage. To the unfortunate Mullah, everything revolves around sex. A Hadith from Bukhari atrociously tells us that a girl can have Nikah (the marital contract) at 6 and the marriage can be consummated at age 9 since the exalted Prophet did that with Hazrat Ayesha! Is there any wonder that the West call him a child-molester? Why don't then the Sunnah-peddlers "marry off" their daughters at 6 and 9? Many countries set an arbitrary 16 years for the girl and 18 years for the boy. The Divine Wisdom enshrined in the Quran makes things so sensible. It sets up three rational criteria:

1 - Sufficient maturity to grant consent. (4:21)

2 - Ability to sign a legal contract. (4:19)

3 - Competence to take care of one's own finances. (4:21)

If Someone Dies of Hunger: If someone dies of hunger, he dies because Allah had written for him to die of hunger. (Tarjumanul Quran, Jan. 1966). Should the government and the community be so easily absolved of their fundamental duty? The Prophet (S) is reported to have said in a well-known Hadith, "If a single person sleeps hungry in a community, Allah removes His protection from that people." Also, Hazrat Umar is reported to have said, "If a dog were to die of hunger by the Euphrates, I am afraid Umar will be held responsible."

How to Establish a Solid Islamic State: Maududi shows a brilliant way to establish a solid Islamic state: Send notice to the population that they must announce within one year whether they should be considered Muslims or non-Muslims. After that one year, all children born to Muslims will be considered Muslims. All those who register as Muslims will be forced to observe the worships and rituals of Islam, five prayers a day, Friday prayers, 2.5 percent charity well-documented, fasting in the month of Ramadhan, Pilgrimage to Makkah for the affluent, sacrificing a sheep or goat at least once a year etc. Then whoever falls short of these obligations of Islam, will be beheaded. (Murtad Ki Saza, Punishment of the Apostate, August 1953, Pg 76). Please note that many Mullahs considered Maududi a heretic apostate. He might have been the first to be put to sword. If this brilliant concept of Maududi is implemented, all the Muslim population of that 'solid' Islamic state will walk around without heads on their shoulders.

The Prophet Was Forgetful: The Prophet came to lead prayers. People lined up. He then started to leave, realizing that he was "junbb" (he had not done the post-coital wash). He left the standing lines and went to take a bath. Then he came back with water trickling. (Tarjumanul Quran, Oct 1956). Maududi presents this insult on the authority of Bukhari reminding the reader that Bukhari also states that it is Satan who causes men to forget during Salaat.

The Noble Ones Lived In Glass Houses: Maududi and other "experts" seem anxious to prove that the Prophet (S) was a forgetful person and that he and his companions walked around junbb. Did the exalted Prophet and his companions live in glass houses and had no sense of privacy? Were they so obsessed with sex? Or is it our Mullahs who are so obsessed? There are ample traditions filled with references to sex, ways of making love, lust, post-coital bath, menstruation, divorce, suckling, slaves, concubines, houris, etc with shameless detail. The grand Vision and the Supreme Ideology of Islam remain elusive to these small minds. The Prophet (S) and his companions were busy creating the noblest revolution in human history and they had no time for this kind of nonsense.

Copies of the Quran Were Burned: Hazrat Uthman burned six copies of the Quran which were all in different tongues. Allah and Rasul had not ordered him to do this. (Syed Maududi, Tarjumanul Quran 1975 Pg 39). Did Maududi witness this? Does the Quran state that it has been revealed in different ways, tongues or dialects?

Is There Life In The Grave? The belief of life in the grave is dangerous and that of no life is also dangerous. (Maududi, Tarjumanul Quran, Dec. 1959). The all knowing Mullah should have checked with the Quran to find the answer. Dead means dead. It is the human nafs, or self that lives on, not the material body. And according to the Quran, the dead do not return to this world. (23:100, 32:12). Death is a prolonged state of sleep until the Day of Resurrection, according to the Quran as shown below.

36:51 And when the Trumpet is blown, out of their disintegrated states to their Lord they will run.

36:52 They will say, "Oh, woe to us! Who has awakened us from our beds of sleep? ---."

Doom of the Grave – Without Judgment: These two verses strongly dismiss the clergy-peddled false concept of punishment in the grave. Will God punish the dead before the Day of Resurrection and before Judgment? Many kinds of suffering ('Azaab) are named in the Quran but 'Azaabil Qabr (Doom of the Grave) is not mentioned even once. But Mullah Maududi writes in his Tarjaman-ul-Quran Dec. 1959: Most people will suffer the doom of the grave until the Day of Resurrection, some of them because they used to eat in bed.

Maududi's Religious Freedom: In an Islamic country, non-Muslims will have full rights to spread their belief, but we will not allow any Muslim to change his or her religion. (Tarjumanul Quran, Dec.1959 Pg 269). The Mullah would behead the 'apostate'. Can you see the blatant and silly contradiction here? According to the Quran, there is no compulsion in religion. (2:256)

Ah! The 'Infidel' Kids: Children of non-Muslims will go to Paradise and will be made slaves of the owners of Paradise. (Ref same, Pg 134). The Mullah probably lived under the wishful thinking that he would be the owner of Paradise! How about slavery, even in Paradise? Maududi never thought that his own children could be eternal slaves.
The daughters of non-Muslims who died young will be made hoors of Paradise. (Asia, Lahore, June 14, 1969). And how will they be treated? According to Maududi, the men of Paradise will have their young, full-breasted houris indoors in their palaces. And the little infidel 'houri girls', eternally staying little, will live in beautiful outdoor tents. Men of Paradise will have sex with them whenever they go about strolling in the evenings. Ah, the poor 'infidel' kids!

Telling Lies May Be Mandatory: Truth is one of the most important principles of Islam and lying is one of the greatest sins. But in real life, needs arise when telling lies is not only allowed, rather it becomes mandatory. (Tarjumanul Quran, May 1958 Pg 54)

Temporary Marriage (Mut'ah) is permissible under certain circumstances. (Tarjumanul Quran, August 1955). Maududi puts forward an example: If a man and woman get stranded on an island, as soon as they procure food, they should go ahead and indulge in sex regardless of their marital status.

Calling Upon The Dead Saints: In response to a question concerning praying at gravesites to the dead saints, Maududi maintains, "It is possible that you may be calling, but they may not be listening. It is also possible that they may be able to listen, but their soul might not be there and you may be calling nobody. Also, it may be that they might be having sex or praying to their Lord and you may tease them in your selfishness." (Ref same, Pg 261). It is possible that Maududi had lost his mind. It is also possible that he has no idea of what he is talking about. See Quran 36:51-52 above.

Imam Abu Hanifa's Fiqh has converted Islam into a frozen Hindu Shastra. (Tarjumanul Quran 1:136). [This one makes sense. SA]

About Allama Sir Muhammad Iqbal: In reply to a question regarding Sir Allama Iqbal's critical view of questionable traditions, Maududi sarcastically states, "In the presence of other scholars, there is no need to know his views." (Reference same, Pg 170). Allama Iqbal was a scholar par excellence and one of the greatest exponents of the Quran through his world-renowned poetry. Any scholarly work in Urdu ignoring the great Allama speaks of the mental destitution of the writer. Also, he was a benefactor of Maududi, providing the jobless Mullah with an opportunity to work at Pathankot. Yet, we do not find a single reference to his sublime thoughts or top class poetry in Maududi's voluminous writings.

v     The more ancient the Mullah, the more authoritative he becomes. A dead Mullah also becomes more revered and authoritative. The Quran warns against blind following of ancestors and equates it with disbelief. (5:104 and many other verses).

Pre-emptive Divorce: The Mullah-in-Chief of the 20th century blindly follows the ancient 'authorities', e.g. Hanafi jurists: If a man utters "divorce" three times even before marriage, the woman he weds will be instantly divorced. (Reference same, Pg 188). How's that?

Dear reader, these were just a few glimpses of the brilliance of Maududi. Only space limits us from presenting quite a few more gems. Let us finish with one more:

SUCKLING ON THE BREASTS OF A YOUNG WOMAN: This is a horrible Hadithi joke. Bukhari writes that Hazrat Ayesha's goat had eaten up the date-leaf upon which were written two Quranic verses. This is supposed to have happened when there was chaos at home because of the demise of the Prophet (S). One of those verses was about stoning the 'Sheikh and Sheikhah', a mature or married man and woman, committing adultery. The other verse was about the grown-up men suckling on a young woman.

The goat-eaten, non-existent, "Ten Sucklings Verse" (the so-called Ayah Ridha'at) is a horrible joke. The 'Imams' of Hadith report that Hazrat Ayesha and Hazrat Maimoon used to advise women of an 'easy' way to admit unrelated men into their privacy. Let any grown up unrelated man suckle on the woman's breasts on ten different occasions and lo and behold! He becomes a Mahram (one who is a family member and can intrude into their privacy from then on). (Hadith 1934 Ibn Majah, 30:12 Malik's Muwatta about the 'criminal' goat). About foster mothers, the Quran clearly states:

4:23 The following women are prohibited for you in marriage: Your … foster-mothers who have ever nursed you, foster-sisters …
The verse is obviously talking of babies and their foster mothers. Children become related to one another in a solemn bond of brotherhood or sisterhood by nursing from a common woman. The woman attains the honor of becoming their mother. According to Maududi, Imam Hanbal says that suckling on a woman on three occasions will confer the bond of suckling relationship on a child. But Imam Shafi'i differs saying that it has to be five times. However, to an aesthetically sound mind the principle is quite clear. But our jurists and Mullahs get entangled in silly disputes.

On Pg 338 Vol 1 of his Tafhim, Mullah Maududi writes that although the jurists differ on the age of suckling, even if a grown up man suckles on a woman, he will enter into the bond of suckling! But the foolishness does not end here. Maududi asserts in Tarjumanul Quran that the amount of milk actually swallowed is of terrible importance. How much milk? Maududi frantically seeks help from Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Malik and comes up with a solution. Well, the amount is that which will be enough to break the fast of a fasting person. However, the three Mullahs fail to elaborate how much milk will be sufficient to break a fast. The Mullahs have neither the sense, nor the courage to reject Ahadith that insult human intelligence, such as this one of a grown up man suckling on a strange woman! Would the Mullahs advise this nonsense to their wives, sisters and daughters? Who knows if Maududi did that?

Ayatullah As-Syed Murtaza Hussain Nasir Ferozabadi, the compiler of "Life Events of Seven Sahaba" happily accepts the great insult but shows his 'sensitivity' by expressing his dismay on the reported judgment of Hazrat Ayesha and Hanbal for neglecting an important issue: "The man would have to handle the female breasts." Maududi is least concerned about it.

Oh, another question. What if a woman has no milk? "Imam" Abu Yousuf said: Sucking at BOTH the dry breasts of a woman will fulfill the Shari'ah law, provided it is done on ten different occasions. (Gharaib fil Tahqiq-il-Mazahib Wa Tafhimul Masaail, Vol 2 Pg 137).

v     Dear reader, our Imams and Mullahs are in the habit of answering questions that were never asked! In fact, they invent hypothetical situations.

Here is news on 19 Sep 2007:

Al Azhar scholar favors adult breastfeeding
Daily Times Monitor

LAHORE: Al-Azhar University in Cairo, the world's leading Sunni university, reports: Sheikh Izzat Atiyaa has issued the fatwa as a way around the prohibition in Islamic religious law against a woman working in private premises with a man who was not her close relative, says the report. Breastfeeding, he argued, would create a familial relationship under Islamic law. Dr Atiyaa explained to the Egyptian newspaper al-Watani al-Yawm that: "A man and a woman who are alone together are not (necessarily) having sex but this possibility exists and breastfeeding provides a solution to this problem (by) transforming the bestial relationship between two people into a religious relationship based on (religious) duties."

In Islamic tradition, breastfeeding establishes a degree of familial relationship between the nurse and the nursed even if there is no biological relationship. Dr Atiyaa argued in his fatwa that if an adult male was nursed by a female co-worker it would likewise establish a familial bond that would permit them to work side by side without raising suspicion of illicit sex.
Dr Atiyaa headed al-Azhar University's department dealing with hadith. He said he had based his ruling on one such tradition according to which, at the Prophet's (peace be upon him) order, a man named Salem was breastfed by the wife of another disciple. "The fact that the hadith regarding the breastfeeding of an adult is inconceivable to the mind does not make it invalid," Dr Atiyaa said, in defending his ruling. "Rejecting it is tantamount to questioning the Prophet's (pbuh) tradition."

Shabbir Ahmed, M.D.
www.ourbeacon.com
Please visit our user-friendly forum:
http://www.ourbeacon.com/cgi-bin/bbs60x/webbbs_config.pl

6440 NW 53 ST
Lauderhill, FL 33319
954-746-2115

--- On Mon, 7/19/10, kaukab siddique <butshikan@msn.com> wrote:

From: kaukab siddique <butshikan@msn.com>
Subject: Aga Khan is much too inferior to compare with Maulana Maudoodi. RE: BREAKING NEWS! Mauadudi ki asliyar or Aukaat (For Koki alone :-)
To: yas1rkhan@hotmail.com, drshabbir@bellsouth.net, zina.khan@yahoo.com, jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca, drmaqazi@yahoo.com, hasniessa@yahoo.com, mohanofchenai@gmail.com, moderate53@yahoo.com, sharouq@gmail.com, bahramji@gmail.com, ank2000pk@yahoo.com, mukhtaralam2000@yahoo.com, mathews_kuruvilla06@yahoo.co.in, atif98@yahoo.com, iftekhar.hai@gmail.com, ummaabroadcasting@rollanet.org, premsadani@hotmail.com, saima29@gmail.com, sohailhashmi@gmail.com, sals420@gmail.com, mikeghouse@aol.com, drmookhi@hotmail.com, tarekfatah@rogers.com, mnaquvi@yahoo.com, azam.sikandar@gmail.com, tirmidhi@hotmail.com, alishaban952@yahoo.com, great72000@yahoo.com, hassan_javid@hotmail.com, aleem.faizee@gmail.com, faruquealamgir@yahoo.com, drshabbir@comcast.net, salsabeel65@yahoo.com, khasif235e@yahoo.com, zakhum@hotmail.com, firasat777@yahoo.com, anwerkhurshid@hotmail.com, yunussidira@yahoo.com, ssmeezan@hotmail.com, ahlam_albahr@yahoo.com, amino66@hotmail.com, k2411871@hotmail.com, pk4318@yahoo.com, april702@cox.net, auzyxkhan@yahoo.co.uk, gul_badshah@yahoo.com, shariq.hamid@yahoo.co.in, ahmadtotonji@yahoo.com, sarwar@muslim-ed-trust.org.uk, mirza.syed@gmail.com, khattak99@yahoo.com, bintwaleed@yahoo.com, gafoor111@yahoo.com, cssharif@yahoo.com, nomani_z@yahoo.com, asra@asranomani.com, yousuftabish@yahoo.com, rafiq786@cbn.net.id, rial982000@yahoo.com, sohail972002@yahoo.co.in, aeisha_786@yahoo.com, bushra_meraj@yahoo.com, cherylin_bas@yahoo.com, doctor_aliasghar@yahoo.com, engrbbkarube@yahoo.com, knowledge4all00@yahoo.com, kristonia7@yahoo.com, hussain@nifty.com, juan.suquillo@gmail.com, fayyaz@reading.org, znanwalla@gmail.com, ahumanb@yahoo.com, akbar@mostmerciful.com, mohanofchenai@googlemail.com, brilliant005@hotmail.com, umah.hai@hotmail.com, farzanaqazi@yahoo.com, tsidd96472@aol.com, africawalla@gmail.com, reform@dawoodi-bohras.com, badshahanizer@gmail.com, ibramsha7@yahoo.com, doctorforu123@yahoo.com, minayet@yahoo.com, nssjobs@att.net, farrukhabidi@yahoo.com, webmaster9@mostmerciful.com, bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com, pakistanaffairs@yahoogroups.com, islam-n-muslims@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 9:52 AM

Yes Sir Khan [fake name]
Your dishonesty is showing again.

If you like Dr. Shabbir's attacks on Maulana Maudoodi so much, why don't you ask him, where are the answers I sent him in response to his attempts to smear Maulana Maudoodi?

Does he have my answers on his site or did he post only his own attacks, torn out of context and pathetic?

The issue here is Aga Khan. Let's do a comparison:

1. Aga Khan is not a scholar and has no books worth reading. Maulana Maudoodi is the greatest Islamic scholar of modern times and his books on Islam have no equals in our times.

2. Aga Khan's group called Ismailis does not support ANY Islamic movement. Jamaate Islami organized by Maulana Maudoodi supports Islamic movements globally.

3. Aga Khan supports and is friends with dictators around the world. Maulana Maudoodi opposed all dictators and suffered prison for his honesty and courage but did not compromise.

4. Ismailis support Imperialism and Zionism. Kuffar and munafiqoon around the world are praising Aga Khan. By contrast Jamaate Islami is the opponent of Israel and condemns US-Israeli occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. All enemies of Islam attack Maulana Maudoodi.

5. Women by the thousands are joining Jamaate Islami. Women who want to be good Muslims are leaving Ismailism.

I am not going to abuse Dr. Shabbir for abusing Maulana Maudoodi. The world knows that Maudoodi served Allah and jamaate Islami is defending Pakistan. Dr. Shabbir cannot harm him. I have a much bigger audience, Check: www.newtrendmag.org

Aga Khanis need to be abused because they have been hurling obscenities at an Islamic woman and attacking the Sahaba, r.a., but I am not abusing them either. Zina Khan's words are sometimes returned to her.

From: yas1rkhan@hotmail.com
To: drshabbir@bellsouth.net; zina.khan@yahoo.com; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca; drmaqazi@yahoo.com; hasniessa@yahoo.com; mohanofchenai@gmail.com; moderate53@yahoo.com; sharouq@gmail.com; bahramji@gmail.com; ank2000pk@yahoo.com; mukhtaralam2000@yahoo.com; mathews_kuruvilla06@yahoo.co.in; atif98@yahoo.com; iftekhar.hai@gmail.com; ummaabroadcasting@rollanet.org; premsadani@hotmail.com; saima29@gmail.com; sohailhashmi@gmail.com; sals420@gmail.com; mikeghouse@aol.com; drmookhi@hotmail.com; tarekfatah@rogers.com; mnaquvi@yahoo.com; azam.sikandar@gmail.com; tirmidhi@hotmail.com; alishaban952@yahoo.com; great72000@yahoo.com; hassan_javid@hotmail.com; aleem.faizee@gmail.com; faruquealamgir@yahoo.com; drshabbir@comcast.net; salsabeel65@yahoo.com; khasif235e@yahoo.com; zakhum@hotmail.com; firasat777@yahoo.com; anwerkhurshid@hotmail.com; yunussidira@yahoo.com; ssmeezan@hotmail.com; ahlam_albahr@yahoo.com; amino66@hotmail.com; k2411871@hotmail.com; pk4318@yahoo.com; april702@cox.net; auzyxkhan@yahoo.co.uk; gul_badshah@yahoo.com; shariq.hamid@yahoo.co.in; ahmadtotonji@yahoo.com; sarwar@muslim-ed-trust.org.uk; mirza.syed@gmail.com; khattak99@yahoo.com; bintwaleed@yahoo.com; gafoor111@yahoo.com; cssharif@yahoo.com; nomani_z@yahoo.com; asra@asranomani.com; yousuftabish@yahoo.com; rafiq786@cbn.net.id; rial982000@yahoo.com; sohail972002@yahoo.co.in; aeisha_786@yahoo.com; bushra_meraj@yahoo.com; cherylin_bas@yahoo.com; doctor_aliasghar@yahoo.com; engrbbkarube@yahoo.com; knowledge4all00@yahoo.com; kristonia7@yahoo.com; hussain@nifty.com; juan.suquillo@gmail.com; fayyaz@reading.org; znanwalla@gmail.com; ahumanb@yahoo.com; akbar@mostmerciful.com; mohanofchenai@googlemail.com; brilliant005@hotmail.com; umah.hai@hotmail.com; farzanaqazi@yahoo.com; tsidd96472@aol.com; africawalla@gmail.com; reform@dawoodi-bohras.com; badshahanizer@gmail.com; ibramsha7@yahoo.com; doctorforu123@yahoo.com; minayet@yahoo.com; nssjobs@att.net; farrukhabidi@yahoo.com; webmaster9@mostmerciful.com; butshikan@msn.com
Subject: RE: BREAKING NEWS! Mauadudi ki asliyar or Aukaat (For Koki alone :-)
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:44:24 +0000

cockab :) tera maududi par sa parda uth gaya lol lol lol lol

Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:54:49 -0700
From: drshabbir@bellsouth.net
Subject: BREAKING NEWS! AGA KHAN IS THE MU'MIN OF THE CENTURY (For Koki alone :-)
To: zina.khan@yahoo.com; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca; drmaqazi@yahoo.com; hasniessa@yahoo.com; mohanofchenai@gmail.com; moderate53@yahoo.com; sharouq@gmail.com; bahramji@gmail.com; ank2000pk@yahoo.com; mukhtaralam2000@yahoo.com; mathews_kuruvilla06@yahoo.co.in; atif98@yahoo.com; iftekhar.hai@gmail.com; ummaabroadcasting@rollanet.org; premsadani@hotmail.com; saima29@gmail.com; sohailhashmi@gmail.com; sals420@gmail.com; mikeghouse@aol.com; drmookhi@hotmail.com; tarekfatah@rogers.com; mnaquvi@yahoo.com; azam.sikandar@gmail.com; tirmidhi@hotmail.com; alishaban952@yahoo.com; great72000@yahoo.com; hassan_javid@hotmail.com; aleem.faizee@gmail.com; faruquealamgir@yahoo.com; drshabbir@comcast.net; salsabeel65@yahoo.com; khasif235e@yahoo.com; zakhum@hotmail.com; firasat777@yahoo.com; anwerkhurshid@hotmail.com; yunussidira@yahoo.com; ssmeezan@hotmail.com; ahlam_albahr@yahoo.com; amino66@hotmail.com; k2411871@hotmail.com; pk4318@yahoo.com; april702@cox.net; auzyxkhan@yahoo.co.uk; gul_badshah@yahoo.com; shariq.hamid@yahoo.co.in; ahmadtotonji@yahoo.com; sarwar@muslim-ed-trust.org.uk; mirza.syed@gmail.com; khattak99@yahoo.com; bintwaleed@yahoo.com; gafoor111@yahoo.com; cssharif@yahoo.com; nomani_z@yahoo.com; asra@asranomani.com; yousuftabish@yahoo.com; rafiq786@cbn.net.id; rial982000@yahoo.com; sohail972002@yahoo.co.in; aeisha_786@yahoo.com; bushra_meraj@yahoo.com; cherylin_bas@yahoo.com; doctor_aliasghar@yahoo.com; engrbbkarube@yahoo.com; knowledge4all00@yahoo.com; kristonia7@yahoo.com; hussain@nifty.com; juan.suquillo@gmail.com; fayyaz@reading.org; znanwalla@gmail.com; ahumanb@yahoo.com; akbar@mostmerciful.com; mohanofchenai@googlemail.com; brilliant005@hotmail.com; umah.hai@hotmail.com; farzanaqazi@yahoo.com; yas1rkhan@hotmail.com; tsidd96472@aol.com; africawalla@gmail.com; reform@dawoodi-bohras.com; badshahanizer@gmail.com; ibramsha7@yahoo.com; doctorforu123@yahoo.com; minayet@yahoo.com; nssjobs@att.net; farrukhabidi@yahoo.com; webmaster9@mostmerciful.com; butshikan@msn.com

KNOW ABOUT: Ant Koki's (Kaukab's) step-father who divorced his third wife, Koki's mother in 1957.

Thanks for your post on our forum!

THE MULLAH-IN-CHIEF OF THE 20TH CENTURY: MAUDUDI (1903-1979)

We will have to be brief about Maududi since he has written volumes upon volumes of nonsense. But a few glimpses should sufficiently demonstrate how the Mullah is playing god to his fans even after his death.

His Name: Before presenting some glimpses of the famous Mullah Maududi's wisdom and knowledge, let us reflect on his full name and title, Maulana Syed Abul A'la Maududi. The name translates as: "Our Master, Owner, the Father of the Most Glorious, Maududi". It is strange that the man claiming to be a great Islamic scholar lived 76 odd years with this name. Does it need much insight to see that the very name is shrieking outright divinity and Shirk? According to the Quran, Maulana (our Master) is none but Allah (9:51). And, obviously, Al-A'la (the Most Glorious) can be none but God. Note: In this chapter, as an example, 1:31 will mean Vol 1 page 31.

His Impact: The treacherous, imbecile Maududi, through his long, confused, confusing and inconclusive writings, has frozen the minds of millions of simple Muslims for the last half century making sure that the Ummah remains stuck in the spider-web of the manmade, counterfeit, Hadithi, Number Two Islam (N2I). The forsakers of the Quran got exactly what they deserved. A significant factor behind his popularity has been the generous royal Saudi support as in the case of the Egyptian Mullah-in-Chief, Syed Qutb in the 1950s.

Maududi's 'Brilliance': Let us examine some brilliance of Maududi through his famous Six Volume Tafseer, Tafhimul Quran (Urdu), by Idara Tarjumanul Quran, Lahore , November, 1982. We will turn to his other writings from time to time, with due reference given.

The Captive Women: 1:340 means Vol 1 Pg 340. The summary and conclusion of his discussion on war captives, Vol 1 Pg 340: Even today, the government must distribute the women war captives among Muslim soldiers and the soldiers should "use" them. This rule will apply to women regardless of whether they belong to the People of the Book, or any other religion. How would the Mullahs feel if Muslims, getting thrashed all around the world today, had their women treated by the 'infidels' in this abominable fashion?

The Quran, verse 47:4 states that the captives of war must be freed either for ransom (e.g. exchange of POWs) or as an act of kindness as soon as the battle ends. There is no third option. When an eminent scholar differed with him and showed how the Quran has closed the door of slavery forever, Maududi responded, "The error of this man lies in that he relies on the Quran to form his opinion." (Tafhimat 2:292)

Slavery: Maududi further alleges that:

v     A slave owner can sell his slave whenever and to whomever he pleases.

v     The act of kindness means that the captives be made slaves and given into the ownership of (Muslim) individuals.

v     A bondwoman given to any man by the rulers is as legal and binding a process as Nikah (marriage).

v     A captive of war will remain a slave even if he or she embraces Islam.

v     If a slave tries to escape or create mischief, the master has the right to kill him/her.

v     While the Shari'ah (religious law made up by Mullahs) has limited the number of wives to four, it places NO LIMIT to the number of concubines a man can possess. He can have sexual relations with them freely. There is no reason for any man to feel bad about having sex with these (captured) concubines. (Tafhimul Quran 1:340 onwards, and 5:14 onwards)

Beware! Dear reader, whenever you encounter statements like "Islam says this," or "Shari'ah states that," know that it is almost invariably the Mullah's own wishful thinking rather than the Word of God.

The Prophet's Broken Teeth: In Tafhimul Quran 5:14 and Tarjaman-ul-Quran 1975 Pg 93, Maududi, on the spurious authority of Ibn Hisham, happily relates that the idolater Sohail bin 'Umro was captured at the Battle of Badr. Some companions wanted to break his teeth, for he was a fiery orator against Islam. The Prophet admonished, "No! If I break his teeth, Allah will break my teeth even though I am a Prophet." Sohail was left alone, but even then, after one year, at the Battle of Uhud, the exalted Prophet's teeth were broken. In the Quran, Allah promises to protect the Prophet (S) from people (5:67). What sinister point is Maududi trying to make? Did the Prophet (S) really lose his teeth in the Battle of Uhud? He lived nine more years after that battle. I have not come across a single narrative suggesting any missing teeth on the person of the exalted Prophet.

Child Molestation: It is not only permissible to give in marriage the girls who have not had their menstrual periods yet. Rather, it is also permissible for the husbands to have sexual intercourse with them. Now it is obvious that something that has been allowed by the Quran, no Muslim has the right to declare it forbidden. (Mullah Maududi, Tafhimul Quran 5:571). Did he marry 'off' his daughters or nieces at age 6 or 9?

The Mullahs are in the habit of opposing the Quran since the Glorious Book hurts their evil desires. The big question arises here, "Does the Quran permit this nonsense?" Here is the answer:

The Marriageable Age: According to the Mullahs, the beginning of the menstrual cycles in a girl and nocturnal emissions in a boy are firm indicators of their age of marriage. To the unfortunate Mullah, everything revolves around sex. A Hadith from Bukhari atrociously tells us that a girl can have Nikah (the marital contract) at 6 and the marriage can be consummated at age 9 since the exalted Prophet did that with Hazrat Ayesha! Is there any wonder that the West call him a child-molester? Why don't then the Sunnah-peddlers "marry off" their daughters at 6 and 9? Many countries set an arbitrary 16 years for the girl and 18 years for the boy. The Divine Wisdom enshrined in the Quran makes things so sensible. It sets up three rational criteria:

1 - Sufficient maturity to grant consent. (4:21)

2 - Ability to sign a legal contract. (4:19)

3 - Competence to take care of one's own finances. (4:21)

If Someone Dies of Hunger: If someone dies of hunger, he dies because Allah had written for him to die of hunger. (Tarjumanul Quran, Jan. 1966). Should the government and the community be so easily absolved of their fundamental duty? The Prophet (S) is reported to have said in a well-known Hadith, "If a single person sleeps hungry in a community, Allah removes His protection from that people." Also, Hazrat Umar is reported to have said, "If a dog were to die of hunger by the Euphrates , I am afraid Umar will be held responsible."

How to Establish a Solid Islamic State: Maududi shows a brilliant way to establish a solid Islamic state: Send notice to the population that they must announce within one year whether they should be considered Muslims or non-Muslims. After that one year, all children born to Muslims will be considered Muslims. All those who register as Muslims will be forced to observe the worships and rituals of Islam, five prayers a day, Friday prayers, 2.5 percent charity well-documented, fasting in the month of Ramadhan, Pilgrimage to Makkah for the affluent, sacrificing a sheep or goat at least once a year etc. Then whoever falls short of these obligations of Islam, will be beheaded. (Murtad Ki Saza, Punishment of the Apostate, August 1953, Pg 76). Please note that many Mullahs considered Maududi a heretic apostate. He might have been the first to be put to sword. If this brilliant concept of Maududi is implemented, all the Muslim population of that 'solid' Islamic state will walk around without heads on their shoulders.

The Prophet Was Forgetful: The Prophet came to lead prayers. People lined up. He then started to leave, realizing that he was "junbb" (he had not done the post-coital wash). He left the standing lines and went to take a bath. Then he came back with water trickling. (Tarjumanul Quran, Oct 1956). Maududi presents this insult on the authority of Bukhari reminding the reader that Bukhari also states that it is Satan who causes men to forget during Salaat.

The Noble Ones Lived In Glass Houses: Maududi and other "experts" seem anxious to prove that the Prophet (S) was a forgetful person and that he and his companions walked around junbb. Did the exalted Prophet and his companions live in glass houses and had no sense of privacy? Were they so obsessed with sex? Or is it our Mullahs who are so obsessed? There are ample traditions filled with references to sex, ways of making love, lust, post-coital bath, menstruation, divorce, suckling, slaves, concubines, houris, etc with shameless detail. The grand Vision and the Supreme Ideology of Islam remain elusive to these small minds. The Prophet (S) and his companions were busy creating the noblest revolution in human history and they had no time for this kind of nonsense.

Copies of the Quran Were Burned: Hazrat Uthman burned six copies of the Quran which were all in different tongues. Allah and Rasul had not ordered him to do this. (Syed Maududi, Tarjumanul Quran 1975 Pg 39). Did Maududi witness this? Does the Quran state that it has been revealed in different ways, tongues or dialects?

Is There Life In The Grave? The belief of life in the grave is dangerous and that of no life is also dangerous. (Maududi, Tarjumanul Quran, Dec. 1959). The all knowing Mullah should have checked with the Quran to find the answer. Dead means dead. It is the human nafs, or self that lives on, not the material body. And according to the Quran, the dead do not return to this world. (23:100, 32:12). Death is a prolonged state of sleep until the Day of Resurrection, according to the Quran as shown below.

36:51 And when the Trumpet is blown, out of their disintegrated states to their Lord they will run.

36:52 They will say, "Oh, woe to us! Who has awakened us from our beds of sleep? ---."

Doom of the Grave – Without Judgment: These two verses strongly dismiss the clergy-peddled false concept of punishment in the grave. Will God punish the dead before the Day of Resurrection and before Judgment? Many kinds of suffering ('Azaab) are named in the Quran but 'Azaabil Qabr (Doom of the Grave) is not mentioned even once. But Mullah Maududi writes in his Tarjaman-ul-Quran Dec. 1959: Most people will suffer the doom of the grave until the Day of Resurrection, some of them because they used to eat in bed.

Maududi's Religious Freedom: In an Islamic country, non-Muslims will have full rights to spread their belief, but we will not allow any Muslim to change his or her religion. (Tarjumanul Quran, Dec.1959 Pg 269). The Mullah would behead the 'apostate'. Can you see the blatant and silly contradiction here? According to the Quran, there is no compulsion in religion. (2:256)

Ah! The 'Infidel' Kids: Children of non-Muslims will go to Paradise and will be made slaves of the owners of Paradise . (Ref same, Pg 134). The Mullah probably lived under the wishful thinking that he would be the owner of Paradise ! How about slavery, even in Paradise ? Maududi never thought that his own children could be eternal slaves.
The daughters of non-Muslims who died young will be made hoors of Paradise . (Asia, Lahore, June 14, 1969). And how will they be treated? According to Maududi, the men of Paradise will have their young, full-breasted houris indoors in their palaces. And the little infidel 'houri girls', eternally staying little, will live in beautiful outdoor tents. Men of Paradise will have sex with them whenever they go about strolling in the evenings. Ah, the poor 'infidel' kids!

Telling Lies May Be Mandatory: Truth is one of the most important principles of Islam and lying is one of the greatest sins. But in real life, needs arise when telling lies is not only allowed, rather it becomes mandatory. (Tarjumanul Quran, May 1958 Pg 54)

Temporary Marriage (Mut'ah) is permissible under certain circumstances. (Tarjumanul Quran, August 1955). Maududi puts forward an example: If a man and woman get stranded on an island, as soon as they procure food, they should go ahead and indulge in sex regardless of their marital status.

Calling Upon The Dead Saints: In response to a question concerning praying at gravesites to the dead saints, Maududi maintains, "It is possible that you may be calling, but they may not be listening. It is also possible that they may be able to listen, but their soul might not be there and you may be calling nobody. Also, it may be that they might be having sex or praying to their Lord and you may tease them in your selfishness." (Ref same, Pg 261). It is possible that Maududi had lost his mind. It is also possible that he has no idea of what he is talking about. See Quran 36:51-52 above.

Imam Abu Hanifa's Fiqh has converted Islam into a frozen Hindu Shastra. (Tarjumanul Quran 1:136). [This one makes sense. SA]

About Allama Sir Muhammad Iqbal: In reply to a question regarding Sir Allama Iqbal's critical view of questionable traditions, Maududi sarcastically states, "In the presence of other scholars, there is no need to know his views." (Reference same, Pg 170). Allama Iqbal was a scholar par excellence and one of the greatest exponents of the Quran through his world-renowned poetry. Any scholarly work in Urdu ignoring the great Allama speaks of the mental destitution of the writer. Also, he was a benefactor of Maududi, providing the jobless Mullah with an opportunity to work at Pathankot. Yet, we do not find a single reference to his sublime thoughts or top class poetry in Maududi's voluminous writings.

v     The more ancient the Mullah, the more authoritative he becomes. A dead Mullah also becomes more revered and authoritative. The Quran warns against blind following of ancestors and equates it with disbelief. (5:104 and many other verses).

Pre-emptive Divorce: The Mullah-in-Chief of the 20th century blindly follows the ancient 'authorities', e.g. Hanafi jurists: If a man utters "divorce" three times even before marriage, the woman he weds will be instantly divorced. (Reference same, Pg 188). How's that?

Dear reader, these were just a few glimpses of the brilliance of Maududi. Only space limits us from presenting quite a few more gems. Let us finish with one more:

SUCKLING ON THE BREASTS OF A YOUNG WOMAN: This is a horrible Hadithi joke. Bukhari writes that Hazrat Ayesha's goat had eaten up the date-leaf upon which were written two Quranic verses. This is supposed to have happened when there was chaos at home because of the demise of the Prophet (S). One of those verses was about stoning the 'Sheikh and Sheikhah', a mature or married man and woman, committing adultery. The other verse was about the grown-up men suckling on a young woman.

The goat-eaten, non-existent, "Ten Sucklings Verse" (the so-called Ayah Ridha'at) is a horrible joke. The 'Imams' of Hadith report that Hazrat Ayesha and Hazrat Maimoon used to advise women of an 'easy' way to admit unrelated men into their privacy. Let any grown up unrelated man suckle on the woman's breasts on ten different occasions and lo and behold! He becomes a Mahram (one who is a family member and can intrude into their privacy from then on). (Hadith 1934 Ibn Majah, 30:12 Malik's Muwatta about the 'criminal' goat). About foster mothers, the Quran clearly states:

4:23 The following women are prohibited for you in marriage: Your … foster-mothers who have ever nursed you, foster-sisters …
The verse is obviously talking of babies and their foster mothers. Children become related to one another in a solemn bond of brotherhood or sisterhood by nursing from a common woman. The woman attains the honor of becoming their mother. According to Maududi, Imam Hanbal says that suckling on a woman on three occasions will confer the bond of suckling relationship on a child. But Imam Shafi'i differs saying that it has to be five times. However, to an aesthetically sound mind the principle is quite clear. But our jurists and Mullahs get entangled in silly disputes.

On Pg 338 Vol 1 of his Tafhim, Mullah Maududi writes that although the jurists differ on the age of suckling, even if a grown up man suckles on a woman, he will enter into the bond of suckling! But the foolishness does not end here. Maududi asserts in Tarjumanul Quran that the amount of milk actually swallowed is of terrible importance. How much milk? Maududi frantically seeks help from Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Malik and comes up with a solution. Well, the amount is that which will be enough to break the fast of a fasting person. However, the three Mullahs fail to elaborate how much milk will be sufficient to break a fast. The Mullahs have neither the sense, nor the courage to reject Ahadith that insult human intelligence, such as this one of a grown up man suckling on a strange woman! Would the Mullahs advise this nonsense to their wives, sisters and daughters? Who knows if Maududi did that?

Ayatullah As-Syed Murtaza Hussain Nasir Ferozabadi, the compiler of "Life Events of Seven Sahaba" happily accepts the great insult but shows his 'sensitivity' by expressing his dismay on the reported judgment of Hazrat Ayesha and Hanbal for neglecting an important issue: "The man would have to handle the female breasts." Maududi is least concerned about it.

Oh, another question. What if a woman has no milk? "Imam" Abu Yousuf said: Sucking at BOTH the dry breasts of a woman will fulfill the Shari'ah law, provided it is done on ten different occasions. (Gharaib fil Tahqiq-il- Mazahib Wa Tafhimul Masaail, Vol 2 Pg 137).

v     Dear reader, our Imams and Mullahs are in the habit of answering questions that were never asked! In fact, they invent hypothetical situations.

Here is news on 19 Sep 2007:

Al Azhar scholar favors adult breastfeeding
Daily Times Monitor

LAHORE : Al-Azhar University in Cairo , the world's leading Sunni university, reports: Sheikh Izzat Atiyaa has issued the fatwa as a way around the prohibition in Islamic religious law against a woman working in private premises with a man who was not her close relative, says the report. Breastfeeding, he argued, would create a familial relationship under Islamic law. Dr Atiyaa explained to the Egyptian newspaper al-Watani al-Yawm that: "A man and a woman who are alone together are not (necessarily) having sex but this possibility exists and breastfeeding provides a solution to this problem (by) transforming the bestial relationship between two people into a religious relationship based on (religious) duties."

In Islamic tradition, breastfeeding establishes a degree of familial relationship between the nurse and the nursed even if there is no biological relationship. Dr Atiyaa argued in his fatwa that if an adult male was nursed by a female co-worker it would likewise establish a familial bond that would permit them to work side by side without raising suspicion of illicit sex.
Dr Atiyaa headed al-Azhar University 's department dealing with hadith. He said he had based his ruling on one such tradition according to which, at the Prophet's (peace be upon him) order, a man named Salem was breastfed by the wife of another disciple. "The fact that the hadith regarding the breastfeeding of an adult is inconceivable to the mind does not make it invalid," Dr Atiyaa said, in defending his ruling. "Rejecting it is tantamount to questioning the Prophet's (pbuh) tradition."

Shabbir Ahmed, M.D.
www.ourbeacon.com
Please visit our user-friendly forum:
http://www.ourbeacon.com/cgi-bin/bbs60x/webbbs_config.pl

6440 NW 53 ST
Lauderhill, FL 33319
954-746-2115

--- On Sat, 7/17/10, kaukab siddique <butshikan@msn.com> wrote:

From: kaukab siddique <butshikan@msn.com>
Subject: Mike Ghouse too has been exposed. Agha Khan's attempt to silence Sis. Gulshan exposed him. RE: PHd slums shits - they fart and the smell pollutes the civilized world
To: zina.khan@yahoo.com, jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca, drmaqazi@yahoo.com, hasniessa@yahoo.com, mohanofchenai@gmail.com, drshabbir@bellsouth.net, moderate53@yahoo.com, sharouq@gmail.com, bahramji@gmail.com, ank2000pk@yahoo.com, mukhtaralam2000@yahoo.com, mathews_kuruvilla06@yahoo.co.in, atif98@yahoo.com, iftekhar.hai@gmail.com, ummaabroadcasting@rollanet.org, premsadani@hotmail.com, saima29@gmail.com, sohailhashmi@gmail.com, sals420@gmail.com, mikeghouse@aol.com, drmookhi@hotmail.com, tarekfatah@rogers.com, mnaquvi@yahoo.com, azam.sikandar@gmail.com, tirmidhi@hotmail.com, alishaban952@yahoo.com, great72000@yahoo.com, hassan_javid@hotmail.com, aleem.faizee@gmail.com, faruquealamgir@yahoo.com, drshabbir@comcast.net, salsabeel65@yahoo.com, khasif235e@yahoo.com, zakhum@hotmail.com, firasat777@yahoo.com, anwerkhurshid@hotmail.com, yunussidira@yahoo.com, ssmeezan@hotmail.com, ahlam_albahr@yahoo.com, amino66@hotmail.com, k2411871@hotmail.com, pk4318@yahoo.com, april702@cox.net, auzyxkhan@yahoo.co.uk, gul_badshah@yahoo.com, shariq.hamid@yahoo.co.in, ahmadtotonji@yahoo.com, sarwar@muslim-ed-trust.org.uk, mirza.syed@gmail.com, khattak99@yahoo.com, bintwaleed@yahoo.com, gafoor111@yahoo.com, cssharif@yahoo.com, nomani_z@yahoo.com, asra@asranomani.com, yousuftabish@yahoo.com, rafiq786@cbn.net.id, rial982000@yahoo.com, sohail972002@yahoo.co.in, aeisha_786@yahoo.com, bushra_meraj@yahoo.com, cherylin_bas@yahoo.com, doctor_aliasghar@yahoo.com, engrbbkarube@yahoo.com, knowledge4all00@yahoo.com, kristonia7@yahoo.com, hussain@nifty.com, juan.suquillo@gmail.com, fayyaz@reading.org, znanwalla@gmail.com, ahumanb@yahoo.com, akbar@mostmerciful.com, mohanofchenai@googlemail.com, brilliant005@hotmail.com, umah.hai@hotmail.com, farzanaqazi@yahoo.com, yas1rkhan@hotmail.com, tsidd96472@aol.com, africawalla@gmail.com, reform@dawoodi-bohras.com, badshahanizer@gmail.com, ibramsha7@yahoo.com, doctorforu123@yahoo.com, minayet@yahoo.com, nssjobs@att.net, farrukhabidi@yahoo.com, webmaster9@mostmerciful.com
Date: Saturday, July 17, 2010, 10:36 AM

We should again thank Zina Khan [fake name] for helping us to see her connection with New Age and Shahin the Hindu lover.

Even if the two Islam haters are not one, their hatred for Islam is almost identical.
Dr. Shabbir may be on to a Hindu-Aga Khani connection here. Thanks to Dr. Shabbir.

Notice the brothel-type language of Zina Khan fake name. This is what Aga Khan is all about. This is how they silence dissent. They silenced Br. Meherally like this but Sis. Gulshan fought back. Then Zina Khan was sent to attack Sis. Gulshan and all the pig mud in which the Ismailis live came out.

Without Zina Khan fake name we wouldn't know the dirt hidden in the Ismaili community. They had Mike Ghouse to hide their filth under "pluralism" but Zina Khan went naked and Mike Ghouse dare not contradict the Aga Khan's slutty rep.

Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:06:34 -0700
From: zina.khan@yahoo.com
Subject: PHd slums shits - they fart and the smell pollutes the civilized world
To: jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca; drmaqazi@yahoo.com; hasniessa@yahoo.com; mohanofchenai@gmail.com; drshabbir@bellsouth.net; moderate53@yahoo.com; sharouq@gmail.com; bahramji@gmail.com; ank2000pk@yahoo.com; mukhtaralam2000@yahoo.com; mathews_kuruvilla06@yahoo.co.in; atif98@yahoo.com; iftekhar.hai@gmail.com; ummaabroadcasting@rollanet.org; premsadani@hotmail.com; saima29@gmail.com; sohailhashmi@gmail.com; sals420@gmail.com; mikeghouse@aol.com; drmookhi@hotmail.com; tarekfatah@rogers.com; mnaquvi@yahoo.com; azam.sikandar@gmail.com; tirmidhi@hotmail.com; alishaban952@yahoo.com; great72000@yahoo.com; hassan_javid@hotmail.com; aleem.faizee@gmail.com; faruquealamgir@yahoo.com; drshabbir@comcast.net; salsabeel65@yahoo.com; khasif235e@yahoo.com; zakhum@hotmail.com; firasat777@yahoo.com; anwerkhurshid@hotmail.com; yunussidira@yahoo.com; ssmeezan@hotmail.com; ahlam_albahr@yahoo.com; amino66@hotmail.com; k2411871@hotmail.com; pk4318@yahoo.com; april702@cox.net; auzyxkhan@yahoo.co.uk; gul_badshah@yahoo.com; shariq.hamid@yahoo.co.in; ahmadtotonji@yahoo.com; sarwar@muslim-ed-trust.org.uk; mirza.syed@gmail.com; khattak99@yahoo.com; bintwaleed@yahoo.com; gafoor111@yahoo.com; cssharif@yahoo.com; nomani_z@yahoo.com; asra@asranomani.com; yousuftabish@yahoo.com; rafiq786@cbn.net.id; rial982000@yahoo.com; sohail972002@yahoo.co.in; aeisha_786@yahoo.com; bushra_meraj@yahoo.com; cherylin_bas@yahoo.com; doctor_aliasghar@yahoo.com; engrbbkarube@yahoo.com; knowledge4all00@yahoo.com; kristonia7@yahoo.com; hussain@nifty.com; juan.suquillo@gmail.com; fayyaz@reading.org; znanwalla@gmail.com; ahumanb@yahoo.com; akbar@mostmerciful.com; mohanofchenai@googlemail.com; brilliant005@hotmail.com; umah.hai@hotmail.com; farzanaqazi@yahoo.com; yas1rkhan@hotmail.com; tsidd96472@aol.com; africawalla@gmail.com; reform@dawoodi-bohras.com; badshahanizer@gmail.com; ibramsha7@yahoo.com; doctorforu123@yahoo.com; butshikan@msn.com; minayet@yahoo.com; nssjobs@att.net; farrukhabidi@yahoo.com; webmaster9@mostmerciful.com
CC: ummaabroadcasting@rollanet.org

"..If you do not respect sahaba and the wives of the Prophet, pbuh, no one will respect you..."

" It is you who should first learn to respect others and be mindful of the sentiments and beliefs of others in society and around you in this civilized world...practice what you preach...don't live like two legged animals - don't give us labels and don't make wild and derogatory accusations ..respect begets respect "

"..Abdullah ibn zubair, r.a., was the first child born in Madinah and sacrificed himself like Hussain, r.a, yet you don't know who he is..."

Tell us more about him so that we too can learn...family background...was he from the Quraysh tribe? who were his parents? how did he sacrifice himself and for what cause? etc etc...we can then talk more..."

"..Shabbir and Mukhtar Alam another PHd slum shit says..."Zina Khan , your text appears with the signature of Sultan Shahin"

Put on your bi focul glasses assholes and you will observe that when I pick an article from his lengthy articles I make sure that I reflect his name so that I am not accused of trying to use any of his own articles as mine....simply stated I acknowledge the contributor...in this case Shahin...whoever the guys is for all I care .

Okay "bahenchod Shabbir and Alam " ?

I have said it again...now keep on guessing and stop placing labels on people like your retarded friend osama bin Siddiqui bin Fart ! ...

Kaukab cleans American toilets and moves around with welfare thugs...what about you Sir ? do you bastards clean asses?

"..Muslims have been much too tolerant and you sectarians keep hurling your abuse..."

Really? rather they have cowered in the shadows against bullies like you junkie and they should kick your balls first as you are a shame and a disgrace to the Umma....who gave you this idea that you are superior in any manner ?...you are just a piece of trash begging everyone to come to your aid !....Shabbir thinks "bahenchod" is too much...then how about me calling you "MOTHER Fuckers" henceforth...Happy? Now get lost both of you ! Go and sleep in your dirty piggish holes...with your domestic animals

--- On Sat, 7/17/10, SHABBIR AHMED <drshabbir@bellsouth.net> wrote:

From: SHABBIR AHMED drshabbir@bellsouth.net

Date: Saturday, July 17, 2010, 10:53 AM

Sultan Shahin aka Zina Khan

By:Dr. Mukhtar Alam

Date: Saturday, 17 July 2010, 4:40 am

NewAgeIslam of India

Zina Khan , your text appears with the signature of Sultan Shahin. So, Sultan Shahin and Zina Khan are one. Is this so? Sultan Shahin saheb, how is this happening? Are you writing with the address of Zina Khan? I was wondering how a woman can use masculine abuse and it looked so much Delhi like abusive language. How a woman would say 'behen*****' All this happening because you refuse to identify but here in the cited mail Zina Khan is identifies at Sultan Shahin, the editor of New Age Islam based in New Delhi. Sultan saheb, I keep on reading from your site and Zina Khan keeps on sharing from this site. Sultan saheb/ Zina Khan, I can meet you any day and share some of my bits personally.Sultan saheb, I know Barelwis and there are many of them close friends and many of them have so much hatred for the work of Tableegi Jamaat.

Shabbir Ahmed, M.D.
www.ourbeacon.com
Please visit our user-friendly forum:
http://www.ourbeacon.com/cgi-bin/bbs60x/webbbs_config.pl

6440 NW 53 ST
Lauderhill, FL 33319
954-746-2115

Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. See how.