Fwd: [MedicalConspiracies] Aspartame letter from EFSA Executive Director

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Grannie <granniefox@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Subject: [MedicalConspiracies] Aspartame letter from EFSA Executive Director
To: "1 MedicalConspiracies@googlegrou" <MedicalConspiracies@googlegroups.com>, "1 Paranormal_Research@yahoogroup" <Paranormal_Research@yahoogroups.com>

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	[Health_and_Healing] Aspartame letter from EFSA Executive Director ( Reply: Please forward to Catherine Geslain-Lancelle) [2 Attachments]
Date:	Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:05:44 -0400
From:	Dr. Betty Martini,D.Hum. <bettym19@mindspring.com>
Reply-To:	Health_and_Healing@yahoogroups.com

<*>[Attachment(s) from Dr. Betty Martini,D.Hum. included below]

Dear Catherine Geslain-Laneele:

I have just reviewed your letter to Mr. McDonald 
of the UK Aspartame Awareness Campaign.  First, I 
 would like to see your background.  I can't even 
imagine someone sending out such information on 
such a well established poison.  To disregard 
established evidence shows industry influence 
because no one except the manufacturers of such poisons have anything to gain.
 
First you say, "It was considered in the Opinion 
of the Scientific Committee on Food in 
2002".  You cannot even consider that review 
since OLAF established that the decision was made 
by one individual who works at the UK Food Safety 
 Agency and not by the entire Scientific Committee 
on Food.  http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/scf2002-postscript.htmwww.sunsentpress.com  I brought this 
 medical text with me, and I know they had no 
intention of giving a fair review since 
neither  Miguel-Angel.Granero-Rosell or 
Peter.wagstaffe was interested enough to even 
open the cover.  I was wired so there is tape of 
 the two hour meeting. Secondly, I brought reports 
from the Aspartame Toxicity Center which showed 
how industry does studies abusing science.  They 
were disregarded and those flawed studies 
used.  Dr. Monte's scientific peer reviewed 
 journal article on methanol was not used in the 
review even though I brought them a copy.  Here 
is a rebuttal of the entire 
review:   http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/scf2002.htmlhttp://www.mpwhi.com/formaldehyde_from_aspartame.pdf 
 This proved the formaldehyde converted from the 
free methyl alcohol embalms living tissue and 
damages DNA.  When you damage DNA you can destroy 
humanity.  How much more proof do you 
need?  Secondly, industry tried to use their 
 flack, Tephly to rebut it and finally Tephly had 
to admit he used the wrong test.  Then the 
aspartame industry tried to assassinate his 
character.  We're used to these tactics.  The 
aspartame industry calls names and does 
 everything it kind to stop the flow of true 
scientific information.  The reason is they can't 
debate the issue because you can't debate honest 
science.  Even a 11 year old child proved the 
breakdown to formaldehyde using Winston 
 Laboratories. 
http://www.nationalexpositor.com/index.php?news=690&vote=5&aid=690&Vote=Votehttp://www.wnho.net/mh_aspartame_letter.htm  Do 
 they and do you have no shame?  We are talking 
about methanol that has been established 
throughout the world as a severe metabolic 
poison, and EFSA is into risk assessment and is 
trying to say its just fine to put in food.  EFSA 
 has proved only one thing, you're still pressured 
by industry to hijack science.

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder
Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
 www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com, www.wnho.netwww.holisticmed.com/aspartamemailto:Maud.PAQUES@efsa.europa.eu]
 >Sent: 01 June 2010 10:55
>To: bigmac2@freenetname.co.ukandrew.wadge@foodstandards.gsi.gov.uk; ADEDAPO Sandra; LAHANIATIS Majlinda
 >Subject: Aspartame letter from EFSA Executive Director
>
>Dear Mr MacDonald,
>
>Please find enclosed a letter from our Executive 
>Director about the substance mentioned above.
>Kind regards,
 >Mrs Pâques
>EFSA
>ANS Unit


<*>Attachment(s) from Dr. Betty Martini,D.Hum.:


<*> 2 of 2 File(s) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Health_and_Healing/attachments/folder/1596211664/item/list 
   <*> letter to J MacDonald 010610.pdf
  <*> UKAAC CG-L  May 201.doc



«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤  Secondly, the entire review was of no  validity.  I know because I addressed the EU in  Brussels and brought to them all the damning  information that they did not consider.  They  were given congressional records so they could  see how aspartame was approved through political  chicanery of Don Rumsfeld and not science.  They  did not even include any reports by Dr. H. J.  Roberts, world expert who testified before  Congress, took care of aspartame victims in the  trenches of medical practice, and wrote the  medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored  Epidemic,   So I ask you why did you even include this review  which only proves one thing, the review was dishonest.  What kind of statement is this:  "papers by Dr.  Monte relating to aspartame were reviewed,  although the overall conclusion was that the  opinions presented by Dr. Monte were  unsubstantiated and of insufficient scientific  robustness."  This is the kind of statement that  could only be made by someone who didn't know how  to rebut the scientific evidence that he  presented.  Dr. Monte uses scientific  references.  Just which ones did you not accept  and for what reason?  Dr. Monte has been  researching the issue for a quarter of a  century.  Please explain to me which of your  experts have that much experience on the issue of aspartame and methanol?  The most damning of the scientific peer reviewed  studies is the Trocho  Study    Industry influence has even been established when  the Ramazzini Studies were reported.  EFSA tried  to use some lunatic  excuse for the findings of  aspartame being a multipotential carcinogen  causing such things as lymphoma and  leukemia.  Using the fact that rats had  respiratory disease made a lot of scientists  laugh since respiratory disease is the dying  process and would have been expected.  Then Dr.  Koeter resigned and admitted in his words "they  were pressured by industry to hijack  science".  Are we to believe in this case  industry just backed off.  They have close  alliance with government agencies throughout the world.  Talking about the EPA draft, which you did not  enclose or tell us how to find, here is some  information.  The amount of methanol ingested by  heavy consumers of aspartame products could  readily exceed 250 mg. daily.  This is 32 times  the limit of consumption recommended by the  Environmental Protection Agency.  Abuse doses  (100 mg aspartame/kg body weight, or more) result  in significant elevations of blood methanol  concentrations in normal subjects (Stegink  1984).  Moreover the level remains detectable for  eight or more hours. The rate of methanol  elimination in humans is five times slower than  for a similar amount of ethyl alcohol (Forney  1968).  Accordingly, the daily ingestion of  "individually innocuous amounts of methyl  alcohol" could result in "eventual poisonous  effects."  This information comes from Dr. H. J.  Roberts books on the subject (Aspartame  (NutraSweet) Is It Safe? and Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic).  Surely "your experts" understand what methanol  causes like pancreatitis, catdiomyopathy,  metabolic acidosis, blindness, etc.  It appears  you're just disregarding this poison altogether  and think because the statement came from EFSA no proof has to be used.  If EFSA had been serious about a review they  would have invited the experts.  Mission Possible  Intl is a global volunteer force who bring the  world the true and honest research by the  experts  to rebut the propaganda released by  aspartame manufacturers and those they influence  and fund.  Do you think your so called experts  from industry could stand by to world experts on  the subjects like H. J. Roberts, M.D., Russell  Blaylock, M.D., the famed Dr. John Olney who  tried to prevent its approval, Ralph Walton,  M.D.,  Dr. Woodrow Monte, Dr. Morando Soffritti,  and Dr. Maria Alemany.   They have been battling  this issue for as long as three decades.  Now  tell me what kind of background EFSA's experts  have other than i8ndustry influence?  You say EFSA is limited to risk assessment.  You  are assessing a severe metabolic poison which is  known the world over and denying its true toxicity.  You will have to do better than this.  We have  sent you so much information on methanol toxicity  and you are denying it all and giving no proof to  the contrary except that you are still tried to  industry influence. Do you really care so little  for the health of the European people.  For  instance, fetal tissue does not tolerate methanol  in any amount, and there is no warning even for  birth defects.  Here is a letter Dr. Russell  Blaylock wrote to a newspaper when one of the  front groups was pushing aspartame even for  pregnant  women:   Aspartame Toxicity Center,   > >From: PAQUES Maud [ >Cc: KENIGSWALD Hugues; Risk Assessment Opinions;  >LIEM Djien; VANHOORDE Robert;  >»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»

§ Health_and_Healing - PULSE ON 21st CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE! §

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Health_and_HealingHealth_and_Healing-subscribe@yahoogroups.com 
  
DETOX WITH ALL NATURAL PURE GREEN CALCIUM BENTONITE CLAY USED INTERNAL/EXTERNAL   http://clayadvantage.com/http://WWW.THEOPENLINE.ORG  
 
ENERGY HEALING TECHNIQUE FOR CHRONIC PAIN, PTSD & OTHER ISSUES THAT TROUBLE YOU.  http://vibrantenergy.webs.com Subscribe send email to:   THE OPEN LINE NEWSPAPER, HEALTH NEWS, SPIRITUAL, ENVIRONMENT, ETC.    

--
To subscribe: MedicalConspiracies-subscribe@googlegroups.com
 
DETOX WITH All NATURAL PURE GREEN CALCIUM BENTONITE CLAY USED INTERNAL/EXTERNAL http://clayadvantage.com/
 
Information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related, purely
speculation or SOMEONE'S OPINION. Consult with a qualified MD before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
By becoming a member of this group you AGREE to hold this group its members, list owners, moderators and affiliates harmless of any liability for any direct, or indirect consequential, incidental, damage incurred.
 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
**COPYRIGHT NOTICE

--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/