Palah Biswas On Unique Identity No1.mpg

Unique Identity No2

Please send the LINK to your Addresslist and send me every update, event, development,documents and FEEDBACK . just mail to palashbiswaskl@gmail.com

Website templates

Zia clarifies his timing of declaration of independence

what mujib said

Jyothi Basu Is Dead

Unflinching Left firm on nuke deal

Jyoti Basu's Address on the Lok Sabha Elections 2009

Basu expresses shock over poll debacle

Jyoti Basu: The Pragmatist

Dr.BR Ambedkar

Memories of Another day

Memories of Another day
While my Parents Pulin Babu and basanti Devi were living

"The Day India Burned"--A Documentary On Partition Part-1/9

Partition

Partition of India - refugees displaced by the partition

Friday, March 16, 2012

Fwd: [Marxistindia] On Union Budget



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: news from the cpi(m) <marxistindia@cpim.org>
Date: Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM
Subject: [Marxistindia] On Union Budget
To: marxistindia <marxistindia@cpim.org>, lalsalam <lalsalam@yahoogroups.com>, prfw@yahoogroups.com, com-news <com-news@yahoogroups.com>, Nammute Parassini <nammuteparassini@gmail.com>


marxistindia
news from the cpi(m)
March 16, 2012



Press Statement



The Polit Bureau of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) has issued the following statement:



The CPI(M) considers that the Union Budget 2012-2013 is a regressive budget which will result in pushing up prices and imposing greater burdens on the working people. The bias towards the corporates and the rich in this budget is seen from the fact that while the direct taxes being levied from the rich will result in a loss of 4500 crores rupees, that from indirect taxes, that is through the increase in across the board service and excise duties, is expected to yield a gain of 45,940 crores. While the CPI(M) welcomes taxes on luxury items, it strongly opposes the reliance on indirect taxes for revenue mobilization as this will lead to a cascading impact pushing up prices across the board.



The CPI(M) also opposes the cut in subsidies  fuel to as much as 25,000 crore rupees. This would inevitably lead to further hikes in fuel prices. The cut in subsidies to fertilizers by 6000 crore rupees will also lead to further price rise of fertilizers which have already imposed unbearable burdens on farmers.



The Governments concerns about cutting subsidies in the name of controlling the fiscal deficit are hypocritical to say the least. There is a huge amount of 5.3 lakh crores revenue foregone in 2011-2012, out of which over rupees fifty thousand crores were tax concessions to corporates. There has been a shortfall of Rs. 30,000 crore in gross tax revenue because vis a vis the budget estimates mainly on account of slack collection from corporates.



At the same time the budget gives a slew of concessions to investments in the stock markets. At a time when globally Governments are trying to control the volatility in stock markets by a tax regime against speculation, the budget cuts the STT (security transactions tax) by 25 per cent and a new tax exemption has been announced to encourage retail stock market investors. This has come at a time when the EPF interest rate has been slashed from 9.5% to 8.25%. The requirement for a capital gains tax to prevent speculation has again been ignored by the Government.



As far as the people are concerned, the claims of added allocations ring hollow because of the dismal record of actual expenditures. the Government may give any figure as the budget estimate but how much does it actually spend of that estimate. In the last year in most Ministries there has been a shameful shortfall in actual expenditures. Crucial programmes like MNREGA have seen a huge shortfall of over 9000 crores in the last year, the gap between the budget estimate and the revised estimate. Similarly the gender budget saw a shortfall of 1200 crores in actual expenditures. This is also an undeclared method of controlling the deficit.



Given the inflation factor the allocations for most programmes are in any case inadequate. For example the record as far as allocations for Scheduled caste Sub Component Plan and Scheduled tribe sub-plan though increased are still far below the required amount of 16.5 per cent and 8.2 per cent of the Plan expenditure and in fact is even lower last year. It is only 7 per cent and 4 per cent respectively.



This budget fails to adequately step up public expenditure to reverse the growth slow down. The sharp cuts in fuel and fertiliser subsidy and across the board hikes in indirect tax rates will also fuel inflation further.



The CPI(M) calls upon the people to oppose this regressive budget.






_______________________________________________
Marxistindia mailing list
Marxistindia@cpim.org
http://cpim.org/mailman/listinfo/marxistindia_cpim.org
http://www.cpim.org

No comments:

Post a Comment