From: Steven Robinson <srobin21@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:57 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] Ilan Pappe on Egypt's revolution and Israel: "Bad for the Jews"
Egypt's revolution and Israel: "Bad for the Jews"
By Ilan Pappe
The Electronic Intifada,
14 February 2011
The view from Israel is that if they indeed succeed, the Tunisian and
Egyptian revolutions are bad, very bad. Educated Arabs -- not all of them
dressed as "Islamists," quite a few of them speaking perfect English whose
wish for democracy is articulated without resorting to "anti-Western"
rhetoric -- are bad for Israel.
Arab armies that do not shoot at these demonstrators are as bad as are many
other images that moved and enthused so many people around the world, even
in the West. This world reaction is also bad, very bad. It makes the Israeli
occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and its apartheid policies inside
the state look like the acts of a typical "Arab" regime.
For a while you could not tell what official Israel thought. In his first
ever commonsensical message to his colleagues, Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu asked his ministers, generals and politicians not to comment in
public on the events in Egypt. For a brief moment one thought that Israel
turned from the neighborhood's thug to what it always was: a visitor or
permanent resident.
It seems Netanyahu was particularly embarrassed by the unfortunate remarks
on the situation uttered publicly by General Aviv Kochavi, the head of
Israeli military intelligence. This top Israeli expert on Arab affairs
stated confidently two weeks ago in the Knesset that the Mubarak regime is
as solid and resilient as ever. But Netanyahu could not keep his mouth shut
for that long. And when the boss talked all the others followed. And when
they all responded, their commentary made Fox News' commentators look like a
bunch of peaceniks and free-loving hippies from the 1960s.
The gist of the Israeli narrative is simple: this is an Iranian-like
revolution helped by Al Jazeera and stupidly allowed by US President Barack
Obama, who is a new Jimmy Carter, and a stupefied world. Spearheading the
Israeli interpretation are the former Israeli ambassadors to Egypt. All
their frustration from being locked in an apartment in a Cairean high-rise
is now erupting like an unstoppable volcano. Their tirade can be summarized
in the words of one of them, Zvi Mazael who told Israeli television's
Channel One on 28 January, "this is bad for the Jews; very bad."
In Israel of course when you say "bad for the Jews," you mean the
Israelis -- but you also mean that whatever is bad for Israel is bad for the
Jews all around the world (despite the evidence to the contrary since the
foundation of the state).
But what is really bad for Israel is the comparison. Regardless of how all
this would end, it exposes the fallacies and pretense of Israel like never
before. Egypt is experiencing a peaceful Intifada with the deadly violence
coming from the side of the regime. The army did not shoot at the
demonstrators; and even before the departure of Mubarak, already seven days
into the protests, the minister of interior who directed his thugs to
violently crash the demonstrations had been sacked and will probably be
brought to justice.
Yes, this was done in order to win time and try to persuade the
demonstrators to go home. But even this scene, by now forgotten, can never
happen in Israel. Israel is a place where all the generals who ordered the
shootings of Palestinian and Jewish anti-occupation demonstrators now
compete for the highest post of Chief of the General Staff.
One of them is Yair Naveh, who gave orders in 2008 to kill Palestinian
suspects even if they could be peacefully arrested. He is not going to jail;
but the young woman, Anat Kamm, who exposed these orders is now facing nine
years in jail for leaking them to Israeli daily Haaretz. Not one Israeli
general or politician has or is going to spend one day in jail for ordering
the troops to shoot at unarmed demonstrators, innocent civilians, women, old
men and children. The light radiating from Egypt and Tunisia is so strong
that it also illuminates the darker spaces of the "only democracy in the
Middle East."
Nonviolent, democratic (be they religious or not) Arabs are bad for Israel.
But maybe these Arabs were there all along, not only in Egypt, but also in
Palestine. The insistence of Israeli commentators that the most important
issue at stake -- the Israeli peace treaty with Egypt -- is a diversion, and
has very little relevance to the powerful impulse that is shaking the Arab
world as a whole.
The peace treaties with Israel are the symptoms of moral corruption not the
disease itself -- this is why Syrian President Bashar Asad, undoubtedly an
anti-Israeli leader, is not immune from this wave of change. No, what is at
stake here is the pretense that Israel is a stable, civilized, western
island in a rough sea of Islamic barbarism and Arab fanaticism. The "danger"
for Israel is that the cartography would be the same but the geography would
change. It would still be an island but of barbarism and fanaticism in a sea
of newly formed egalitarian and democratic states.
In the eyes of large sections of Western civil society the democratic image
of Israel has long ago vanished; but it may now be dimmed and tarnished in
the eyes of others who are in power and politics. How important is the old,
positive image of Israel for maintaining its special relationship with the
United States? Only time will tell.
But one way or another the cry rising from Cairo's Tahrir Square is a
warning that fake mythologies of the "only democracy in the Middle East,"
hardcore Christian fundamentalism (far more sinister and corrupt than that
of the Muslim Brotherhood), cynical military-industrial corporate
profiteering, neo-conservatism and brutal lobbying will not guarantee the
sustainability of the special relationship between Israel and the United
States forever.
And even if the special relationship perseveres for a while, it is now based
on even shakier foundations. The diametrically-opposed case studies of the
so far resilient anti-American regional powers of Iran and Syria, and to
some extent Turkey, on the one hand, and the fallen ultimate pro-American
tyrants, on the other are indicative: even if it is sustained, American
support may not be enough in future to maintain an ethnic and racist "Jewish
state" in the heart of a changing Arab world.
This could be good news for the Jews, even for the Jews in Israel in the
long run. To be surrounded by peoples who cherish freedom, social justice
and spirituality and navigating sometimes safely and sometimes roughly
between tradition and modernity, nationalism and humanity, aggressive
capitalist globalization and daily survival, is not going to be easy.
Yet it has a horizon, and it carries hope of triggering similar changes in
Palestine. It can bring a closure to more than a century of Zionist
colonization and dispossession, to be replaced by more equitable
reconciliation between the Palestinian victims of these criminal policies
wherever they are and the Jewish community. This reconciliation would be
built on the basis of the Palestinian right of return and on all the other
rights the people of Egypt so bravely fought for in the last twenty days.
But trust the Israelis not to miss an opportunity to miss peace. They would
cry wolf. They would demand, and receive, more funds from the American
taxpayer due to the new "developments." They would interfere clandestinely
and destructively to undermine any transition to democracy (remember what
force and viciousness characterized their reaction to democratization in
Palestinian society?), and they would elevate the Islamophobic campaign to
new and unprecedented heights.
But who knows, maybe the American taxpayer would not budge this time. And
maybe the European politicians would follow the general sentiment of their
public and allow not only Egypt to be dramatically transformed, but also
welcome a similar change in Israel and Palestine. In such a scenario the
Jews of Israel have a chance to become part of the real Middle East and not
an alien and aggressive member of a Middle East which was the figment of the
hallucinatory Zionist imagination.
Ilan Pappe is Professor of History and Director of the European Centre for
Palestine Studies at the University of Exeter. His most recent book is Out
of the Frame: The Struggle for Academic Freedom in Israel (Pluto Press,
2010).
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article11803.shtml
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from
http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment